Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 4 Question 70 Discussion

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?#include #include #include using namespace std;templatestruct Out {ostream & out;Out(ostream & o): out(o){}void operator() (const T & val ) { out
E) 1 2 3 4
A) 8 10 5 1 4 6 2 7 9 3
B) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
D) compilation error

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 4 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPP exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 4
[All CPP Questions]

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?

#include

#include

#include

using namespace std;

templatestruct Out {

ostream & out;

Out(ostream & o): out(o){}

void operator() (const T & val ) { out<

int main() {

int t[]={8, 10, 5, 1, 4, 6, 2, 7, 9, 3};

deque d1(t, t+10);

deque::iterator it = lower_bound(d1.begin(), d1.end(), 4);

for_each(it, d1.end(), Out(cout));cout<

return 0;

}

Program outputs:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

by Daniela at Aug 05, 2023, 08:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Casie
8 months ago
I thought it would print all the numbers in order, but I guess not!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
8 months ago
It's definitely not a compilation error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
8 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it would be something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
9 months ago
Totally agree, that's what I got too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
9 months ago
The program outputs 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
9 months ago
I have a feeling there might be a compilation error, but I can't pinpoint why. I should have paid more attention to the iterator usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the output could be the elements starting from 4, but I can't recall if it includes 4 itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
9 months ago
I remember something about `lower_bound` returning an iterator to the first element not less than the given value, so it might start from 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
9 months ago
I think the code should compile fine since all the includes seem correct, but I'm not sure what the output will be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
10 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think option B about emails consuming Super Messages is the most likely explanation. I'll make sure to double-check the details around that in my preparation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
10 months ago
Okay, I remember discussing this in class. The capitalization rate should be a blend of the debt and equity components, so I'll select option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward vocabulary question. I'll carefully read through the options and choose the one that best fits the context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
1 year ago
The code looks pretty straightforward, but I can't help but wonder if the programmer had a bad day when they wrote this. Anyway, I'm going with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
1 year ago
Wait, is the lower_bound function supposed to return the element itself or the first element greater than the value? I'm not sure about the answer.
upvoted 0 times
Carmelina
1 year ago
Exactly, that's why the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 year ago
So the output will start from 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 year ago
It returns the first element greater than or equal to the value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 year ago
B) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chuck
1 year ago
Haha, looks like we're sorting a deque in reverse order. The correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
Raymon
1 year ago
Definitely C, it's sorting in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
1 year ago
Yeah, it's sorting in reverse. C is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
1 year ago
I agree, the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ty
1 year ago
I think the code will compile without any errors, so the answer is not E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
1 year ago
The output should be 4 5 6 7 8 9 10, so the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
Maddie
1 year ago
Great job! You understood the code correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
1 year ago
That's correct! The output is indeed 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
1 year ago
That's correct! The output should be 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
1 year ago
A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
1 year ago
A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shalon
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 because lower_bound returns an iterator to the first element that is not less than the value passed, which is 4 in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
1 year ago
I agree with Viola, the lower_bound function returns an iterator to the first element that is not less than the value passed, so the output should be A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 because lower_bound finds the first element that is not less than 4 in the deque.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel