New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 3 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPP exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 3
[All CPP Questions]

Which method added to class B at the marked spot will allow the code below to compile? Choose

all possible solutions.

#include

#include

#include

using namespace std;

class B { int val;

public:

B(int v):val(v){}

int getV() const {return val;}

/* Insert Code Here */

};

ostream & operator <<(ostream & out, const B & v) { out<

templatestruct Out {

ostream & out;

Out(ostream & o): out(o){}

void operator() (const T & val ) { out<

int main() {

int t[]={8, 10, 5, 1, 4, 6, 2, 7, 9, 3};

vector v1(t, t+10);

sort(v1.begin(), v1.end(), greater());

for_each(v1.begin(), v1.end(), Out(cout));cout<

return 0;

}

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Antione at Mar 23, 2023, 11:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Daisy
4 months ago
Totally agree, C is the only one that fits!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
Wait, does E even make sense in this context?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
4 months ago
D won't work for sorting, just equality check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
4 months ago
I think C is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
4 months ago
A needs to return a bool for comparison!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
5 months ago
I feel like the equality operator isn't really useful for sorting, so I think options A, C, and E are the most likely candidates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the sorting function. Wouldn't we need both < and > operators to sort correctly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
5 months ago
I think we practiced a question where we had to implement comparison operators. I feel like option C could work since it defines greater-than.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
5 months ago
I remember we discussed operator overloading in class, but I'm not sure if we need a less-than operator for sorting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through each option and think about which ones accurately describe the features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure on this one. The options all seem relevant, but I'm leaning towards the tool capabilities that allow setup and teardown of the test suites and SUT. That flexibility could be key for dealing with the unreliable environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
5 months ago
I remember practicing with a question like this, and I think W3C was mentioned as an option. Could it be the correct one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure I get the reasoning behind this. I'll need to think it through step-by-step to make sure I have the right understanding before responding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
9 months ago
I'm with Corinne and Roselle on this one. Option C is the obvious choice, unless you want your code to compile but sort your vector in the wrong order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
9 months ago
Come on, folks, this is a no-brainer. Option C is the way to go. How else would you expect the sort function to work with your custom class?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Maybe we should also consider option E, as that could potentially work by allowing the class B to be implicitly converted to an integer for the sort function.
upvoted 0 times
Myrtie
8 months ago
Let's go with both options A and E to cover all possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
8 months ago
Option A makes sense too, it defines the comparison needed for sorting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
9 months ago
But what about option A? It defines the less than operator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
9 months ago
I think option E could work, it allows implicit conversion to int.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roselle
10 months ago
I agree with Corinne. Option C is the way to go, as it will provide the necessary comparison function for the sort operation.
upvoted 0 times
Omega
8 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
8 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
10 months ago
Option C seems like the correct answer. We need to define a greater-than operator for the class B to allow the sort function to work as expected.
upvoted 0 times
William
9 months ago
Yes, that will allow the sort function to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
9 months ago
I agree, we need to define a greater-than operator for the class B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
10 months ago
I think option C is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
11 months ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the best choice because it compares the values correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
11 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...