Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS TM12 Exam - Topic 8 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TM12 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 8
[All TM12 Questions]

You are following a risk-based testing strategy. The test execution time is very limited. Assume that all the product risk items require more or less the same level of test effort.

Which of the following answers describes the best execution schedule in this scenario?

Number of correct responses: 1

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lavera at Aug 23, 2024, 05:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM12 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Eun
4 months ago
A looks good for prioritizing transaction testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
4 months ago
Not sure about this. Are all risks really equal here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
4 months ago
Wait, why is pre-activation first? Shouldn't activation come before that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
4 months ago
I disagree, C seems more logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
5 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the order here; I thought we should focus on the most critical functions first, but I can't recall which option that was.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
5 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to order test cases based on dependencies. I think pre-activation should come before activation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think testing the acceptance of transactions first could be crucial since it's the end goal for users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
5 months ago
I remember we discussed prioritizing tests based on the user journey, so maybe starting with the activation makes sense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
5 months ago
This is a good example of balancing multiple priorities. I'll need to consider the risk levels and test effort required for each step to determine the best execution schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
5 months ago
Okay, I think I understand the key factors here - risk-based testing and limited time. I'll need to weigh the importance of each test and choose the most efficient sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
Hmm, the question mentions limited test execution time, so I'll need to prioritize the most critical tests. Let me analyze the options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the risk-based approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the namespace declaration. Does that mean the 'Book' element is part of the XML Schema namespace? I'll have to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
10 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. Gotta test that smart card functionality first before worrying about the IVR. Can't have the customer's card not working, am I right? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
10 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. But I'd go with option B. It seems to flow logically from the core smart card tests to the less critical IVR channel. Can't go wrong with that, right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
10 months ago
Option D makes the most sense to me. It prioritizes the smart card activation and pre-activation tests, which are the most crucial, and then covers the other test cases.
upvoted 0 times
Leanna
9 months ago
Francoise: Definitely, it ensures we cover the most crucial areas first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
9 months ago
Yes, that way we can address the high-risk items first and then move on to the other test cases within the limited test execution time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
9 months ago
User 3: It makes sense to prioritize those tests before moving on to the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
9 months ago
I agree, focusing on the activation and pre-activation first is a good strategy to ensure the core functionalities are working properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
9 months ago
Option D makes the most sense to me. It prioritizes the smart card activation and pre-activation tests, which are the most crucial, and then covers the other test cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, focusing on smart card activation and pre-activation first is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
10 months ago
User 1: I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgie
10 months ago
I think option B is the best choice here. It focuses on testing the critical smart card functionality first, which is the core of the system, and then tests the IVR channel which is likely less risky.
upvoted 0 times
Tiffiny
9 months ago
User 3: Yes, focusing on the core of the system is important in a risk-based testing strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, testing the critical smart card functionality first makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
10 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mollie
11 months ago
Why do you think option D is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
12 months ago
I think the best execution schedule is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel