BCS Exam TM12 Topic 5 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TM12 exam

Question #: 110
Topic #: 5

[All TM12 Questions]

You are not confident with the assessment of the risk level and you suspect that it will be possible to find high-priority bugs in low-risk areas.

Furthermore the period for test execution is very short. Your goal is to test all the product risks in a risk-based way, while assuring that each product risk gets at least some amount of testing.

Which of the following answers describes the best test execution schedule in this scenario?

Number of correct responses: 1

AT1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10

BT1, T3, T5, T7, T9, T2, T4, T6, T8, T10

CT10, T9, T8, T7, T6, T5, T4, T3, T2, T1

DT10, T8, T6, T4, T2, T9, T7, T5, T3, T1

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Veronika at Apr 09, 2025, 10:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM12 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Fausto

1 months ago

I believe option B is the best choice. It focuses on testing the high-risk areas first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

1 months ago

So, which test execution schedule do you think is the best?

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

1 months ago

I agree with you, Gail. We need to focus on the critical areas first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

2 months ago

Ha! Choosing the tests in reverse order, like in option C? That's a bold move, but I don't think it's the best approach in this scenario. Maybe the test team is feeling a bit mischievous today.

upvoted 0 times

Lenna

1 days ago

Maybe the test team thought they could catch more bugs by testing in reverse order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vi

16 days ago

I think we should prioritize testing the high-risk areas first, regardless of the order in the schedule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

1 months ago

I agree, choosing tests in reverse order might not be the best approach for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dawne

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't it be better to alternate between high and low-risk tests to cover a wider range of risks? Option D seems more balanced to me.

upvoted 0 times

Goldie

16 days ago

I agree, alternating between high and low-risk tests could help cover a wider range of risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shad

26 days ago

I think you're right. Option D does seem more balanced.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

2 months ago

I think we should prioritize testing the high-priority bugs first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lilli

2 months ago

I think option B is the best choice here. It ensures that each product risk gets at least some testing, while prioritizing the tests based on the risk level.

upvoted 0 times

...