New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CSSBB Exam - Topic 9 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CSSBB exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 9
[All CSSBB Questions]

A project activity not on the critical path has required 20% longer than the time originally allocated. The project team should:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: F

by Gail at Mar 09, 2024, 06:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSSBB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brittni
3 months ago
Non-critical path delays don't always mean a full project delay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
3 months ago
I think option B is misleading, it could still delay the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
3 months ago
Wait, how can we be sure it won't affect the schedule?
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
4 months ago
Definitely agree, option C makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
4 months ago
This is a classic case of non-critical path delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought any delay meant the project would be delayed by the same amount, but I guess it depends on the dependencies?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
4 months ago
I feel like the right answer might be to study the effects on other activities. Just because it's not on the critical path doesn't mean it won't affect the timeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
4 months ago
I think I saw a practice question where we had to analyze the effects of delays on critical vs. non-critical tasks. Maybe it’s less than 20%?
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
5 months ago
I remember something about how non-critical path activities can still impact the overall schedule, but I'm not sure how much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C. The key is to analyze the impact on the critical path and other dependencies, rather than assuming a 20% delay for the entire project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
5 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. If an activity not on the critical path is delayed, the project team should study the effect on other activities to determine the actual impact on the overall project schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Does the question mean that the activity is 20% longer than planned, or that the entire project will be delayed by 20%? I need to make sure I understand the scenario correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If the activity is not on the critical path, then the 20% delay may not necessarily impact the entire project. I should analyze the dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the impact on the critical path and the overall project timeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
5 months ago
Okay, let me take a closer look at the exhibit. I think I can figure this out if I break it down step-by-step and make sure I understand the BGP configuration on both routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the purpose of getting senior managers to buy into a P3O. I think the answer is C - using their influence to champion the change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
5 months ago
I've got a good strategy for this. I'll use the NVL function to check if the credit limit is null, and if so, display "Not Available". Then I'll multiply the credit limit by 1.15 to get the 15% increase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
10 months ago
Wait, so we're supposed to just tell everyone the project is delayed without actually knowing the extent of the delay? That's a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Carman
9 months ago
C) study the effect this will have on other activities because the project may still be on schedule
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
9 months ago
B) inform all concerned that the entire project will be delayed but by less than 20%
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
9 months ago
A) inform all concerned that the entire project will be delayed by 20%
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keneth
10 months ago
Option B sounds like the safe bet. It's better to err on the side of caution when it comes to project delays.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
9 months ago
Then we would have to reassess and communicate the new timeline to everyone involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
9 months ago
But what if the delay ends up being more than 20% in the end?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
10 months ago
I agree, it's always better to underpromise and overdeliver.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brianne
10 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Studying the effect on other activities is crucial to understanding the overall impact on the project schedule.
upvoted 0 times
Tomoko
9 months ago
We should definitely take a closer look at the impact on other activities before making any announcements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
9 months ago
Let's analyze the situation before jumping to conclusions. Option C seems like the most logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
10 months ago
I agree, we can't just assume the whole project will be delayed by 20%. It might still be on track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
10 months ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. We need to see how this delay will affect everything else.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carolynn
10 months ago
I agree with Alana, we need to assess the impact on other activities before jumping to conclusions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
10 months ago
I disagree, we should study the effect this will have on other activities first before informing everyone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
10 months ago
I think we should inform everyone that the entire project will be delayed by 20%.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel