Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASQ CSSBB Exam - Topic 5 Question 92 Discussion

Posted by Pamella on Jul 08, 2024 at 01:58 PM

For a line in an FMEA form a team has established the following:

Cost: $82

Severity: 7

Occurrence: 9

Detection: 4

Target date: 7 days

What should the risk priority number (RPN) be for this line:

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CSSBB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
DA
Dan 10 months ago
I’m going with none of the above.
WE
Wenona 11 months ago
Wait, how did they get 144,648? That seems way off.
KA
Kasandra 11 months ago
No way, it’s definitely 1764.
LI
Linsey 11 months ago
I think the RPN should be 252. Seems right!
JA
Jade 11 months ago
RPN is calculated by multiplying Severity, Occurrence, and Detection.
DE
Dexter 12 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen an answer like 252 before in practice, but I’m not confident if I did the math right this time.
JA
Janessa 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the detection part. Does it really affect the RPN that much? I thought it was mainly about severity and occurrence.
AD
Adelaide 12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the formula is Severity x Occurrence x Detection. So, it should be 7 x 9 x 4.
AL
Alishia 1 year ago
I think the RPN is calculated by multiplying severity, occurrence, and detection, but I’m not completely sure about the numbers.
CH
Christene 1 year ago
Okay, I've got it. The RPN is Severity x Occurrence x Detection, so the correct answer is 7 x 9 x 4 = 252. Easy peasy!
CE
Ceola 1 year ago
Wait, I think there's something I'm missing here. The numbers seem high, so I want to make sure I'm not overlooking anything before I commit to an answer.
RE
Renea 1 year ago
This looks straightforward. Severity is 7, Occurrence is 9, and Detection is 4. Plugging those into the formula, the RPN should be 7 x 9 x 4 = 252.
JO
Joaquin 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused. The question mentions a "target date" of 7 days, but I'm not sure how that factors into the RPN calculation. I'll need to double-check the FMEA process.
RO
Rosalind 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The RPN formula is Severity x Occurrence x Detection, so we just need to plug in the values given.
GE
Georgene 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the opening balances for receivables and inventory. I'll need to think through those carefully. And the mark-up information is important, so I'll make sure I understand how that relates to the profit.
EM
Emerson 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Digital signatures are all about ensuring the message hasn't been tampered with and came from the right source. So the attack that would get around that is probably a replay attack, where you just reuse a valid signed message.
DO
Dottie 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Is the goal to monitor just the egress costs for the Apache server, or the overall egress costs for the entire project? The difference between options A/B and C/D is not entirely clear to me. I might need to re-read the question a few times to make sure I understand the requirements properly.
NA
Na 1 year ago
Seriously, who came up with these answer choices? It's like they pulled them out of a hat. I'm just gonna go with D) 63 and hope for the best.
HE
Helene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Na
I'm sticking with D) 63, it seems like the best option.
CA
Casie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Na
I'm not so sure, maybe we should reconsider.
TA
Tamekia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Na
I agree, let's go with that.
TI
Timothy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Na
I think D) 63 is a good choice.
SH
Shelia 1 year ago
Hah, 144,648? That's more like a lottery jackpot than an RPN. I'm going with C) 1764 on this one.
LY
Lyda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shelia
I'm also going with C) 1764. It seems like the most appropriate RPN for this line.
LE
Leigha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shelia
Yeah, I think C) 1764 is the best choice based on the values provided.
HO
Hoa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shelia
I agree, 144,648 seems way too high. C) 1764 seems more reasonable.
AR
Arletta 1 year ago
Okay, let's see... Severity of 7, Occurrence of 9, and Detection of 4. I'm pretty sure the RPN should be 252. This test is trying to trip us up!
KA
Karan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arletta
That makes sense. Good job on catching that!
AM
Amber 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arletta
So, 7 x 9 x 4 equals 252.
JU
Justine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arletta
Yeah, I agree. The formula for RPN is Severity x Occurrence x Detection.
SH
Sherill 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arletta
I think you're right, the RPN should be 252.
BU
Bulah 1 year ago
I'm not sure about the calculation, but I think it's important to consider the cost and target date as well. Maybe the answer is C) 1764.
TA
Tammara 1 year ago
Wait, did they really just calculate the RPN wrong? This is like something out of a bad comedy sketch.
YO
Yoko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tammara
I agree, that seems more reasonable based on the numbers given.
SH
Sharita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tammara
D) 63
RE
Rebecka 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tammara
Wait, that seems way too high. Let's double check the calculations.
ST
Stefany 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tammara
A) 144,648
HE
Helene 2 years ago
I agree with Deandrea, the RPN calculation makes sense. So, the answer should be B) 252.
DE
Deandrea 2 years ago
I think the RPN should be calculated as Severity x Occurrence x Detection, so it should be 252.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel