New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASQ CSSBB Exam - Topic 11 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CSSBB exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 11
[All CSSBB Questions]

There have been some instances in which 1.5 inch sheet metal screws are used where 1.25 inch should have been used. This produces a critical defect. The decision is made to have all 1.25 inch screws have a square reduced head and all 1.5 inch screws be Phillips. This is an example of:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Xuan
3 months ago
Are we sure this is the best solution? Seems a bit overcomplicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
3 months ago
Agree, the square head vs. Phillips is a good way to prevent mistakes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
4 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize screw size could lead to such critical defects!
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
4 months ago
I don't think that's right, it sounds more like standard work to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
4 months ago
This is definitely an example of poka-yoke.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
4 months ago
I feel like this could also relate to standard work, but I’m leaning more towards poka-yoke since it’s about error-proofing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
4 months ago
This seems like a classic example of poka-yoke to me, especially since it’s about avoiding defects with the screw heads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
5 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about visual factory concepts. Could it be that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
5 months ago
I think this might be related to poka-yoke since it’s about preventing mistakes with the screw types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I know we can access the Process Timeline, but I'm not sure if it's through a specific button or link. I'll have to review my notes to see if I can recall the exact terminology used in Falcon.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
5 months ago
I really can't remember the exact purpose; I feel like it might help with detecting shifts, but the theories part is also really relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
5 months ago
I've got a strategy - I'll start by analyzing the code line by line, and then try to predict the possible outputs based on my understanding of Java syntax and semantics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
9 months ago
I'm going with C) poka-yoke. Differentiating the screw heads is a great way to visually cue the workers and prevent the critical defect. This is like the 'square peg, round hole' of the manufacturing world. *grins*
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
10 months ago
C) poka-yoke, no doubt about it. This is textbook mistake-proofing to eliminate the possibility of the critical defect. Gotta love those clever engineers and their screw head solutions. *laughs*
upvoted 0 times
Clay
8 months ago
C) poka-yoke, no doubt about it. This is textbook mistake-proofing to eliminate the possibility of the critical defect. Gotta love those clever engineers and their screw head solutions. *laughs*
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
8 months ago
E) set up time reduction (SMED)
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
8 months ago
D) standard work
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
8 months ago
C) poka-yoke
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
8 months ago
B) kanban
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
8 months ago
A) visual factory
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Britt
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with C) poka-yoke. Changing the screw heads is a clever way to physically prevent the wrong screws from being used. It's like the engineering equivalent of a 'baby-proof' cabinet. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Yuonne
8 months ago
User 3: Definitely a smart move to avoid critical defects. Poka-yoke for the win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
8 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's like a foolproof system. Making it impossible to use the wrong screws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
8 months ago
User 1: I think it's C) poka-yoke too. It's all about preventing mistakes before they happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebecka
10 months ago
I was torn between C) poka-yoke and D) standard work, but the fact that they're changing the screw head designs to make them visually distinct makes poka-yoke the clear answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think poka-yoke makes sense in this scenario to prevent critical defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
11 months ago
Definitely C) poka-yoke. Differentiating the screw heads is a classic example of a mistake-proofing technique to prevent the critical defect.
upvoted 0 times
Amie
9 months ago
It's important to implement mistake-proofing techniques in manufacturing processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
10 months ago
Poka-yoke is all about making it impossible to make mistakes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
10 months ago
It's definitely a poka-yoke technique to avoid critical defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
10 months ago
I agree, using different screw heads is a great way to prevent mistakes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
11 months ago
I agree with Theola. Poka-yoke is about mistake-proofing processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) poka-yoke.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel