Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APMG-International Exam AgilePM-Practitioner Topic 1 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's AgilePM-Practitioner exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 1
[All AgilePM-Practitioner Questions]

Answer the following questions about the acceptance criteria within the project.

Decide whether the approach to setting and using acceptance criteria has been applied appropriately and select the response that supports your decision.

During Solution Development Timebox A, a new Health and Safety requirement arises: the front door is required to have wheelchair access. This is a legal requirement and is a Must Have before any staff or general public access can be allowed. The Solution Development Team will work with the Local Planning Authority Officer, the specialist who identified the requirement, to identify further acceptance criteria for Solution Development Timebox A.

Is this an appropriate action related to acceptance criteria?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A . Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.

Rationale:

Agile Project Management is adaptable to changes, even late in the development process. The introduction of a new Health and Safety requirement, such as wheelchair access, which is a legal and must-have requirement, needs to be incorporated into the project as soon as it is identified. Working with the Local Planning Authority Officer to define acceptance criteria ensures that the requirement is clearly understood and that the solution developed meets the necessary legal standards. This approach ensures that the team can immediately address the new requirement and integrate it into the current work cycle, aligning with Agile's principle of welcoming changing requirements, even late in development, for the customer's competitive advantage.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Nelida
3 days ago
Haha, imagine if the Business Visionary tried to define acceptance criteria for a legal wheelchair access requirement. That would be a real 'must not' situation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
10 days ago
B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
13 days ago
Option B makes the most sense to me. The Local Planning Authority Officer is the expert, so they should be the one guiding the acceptance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
19 days ago
A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
24 days ago
I'm with Charisse on this one. We can't just ignore a legal requirement, even if it wasn't on the original list. Gotta stay agile, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
5 days ago
User 3: Definitely, staying agile means adapting to new requirements as they arise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
11 days ago
User 2: I agree with Victor. We have to address the legal requirement in a timely manner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
16 days ago
User 1: A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charisse
29 days ago
Option A seems like the way to go. The new requirement is a legal must-have, so it needs to be addressed in this timebox.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
22 days ago
User 1: A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel