New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon MLS-C01 Exam - Topic 3 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLS-C01 exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 3
[All MLS-C01 Questions]

A manufacturing company needs to identify returned smartphones that have been damaged by moisture. The company has an automated process that produces 2.000 diagnostic values for each phone. The database contains more than five million phone evaluations. The evaluation process is consistent, and there are no missing values in the dat

a. A machine learning (ML) specialist has trained an Amazon SageMaker linear learner ML model to classify phones as moisture damaged or not moisture damaged by using all available features. The model's F1 score is 0.6.

What changes in model training would MOST likely improve the model's F1 score? (Select TWO.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

Option A is correct because reducing the number of features with the SageMaker PCA algorithm can help remove noise and redundancy from the data, and improve the model's performance. PCA is a dimensionality reduction technique that transforms the original features into a smaller set of linearly uncorrelated features called principal components. The SageMaker linear learner algorithm supports PCA as a built-in feature transformation option.

Option E is correct because using the SageMaker k-NN algorithm with a dimension reduction target of less than 1,000 can help the model learn from the similarity of the data points, and improve the model's performance. k-NN is a non-parametric algorithm that classifies an input based on the majority vote of its k nearest neighbors in the feature space. The SageMaker k-NN algorithm supports dimension reduction as a built-in feature transformation option.

Option B is incorrect because using the scikit-learn MDS algorithm to reduce the number of features is not a feasible option, as MDS is a computationally expensive technique that does not scale well to large datasets. MDS is a dimensionality reduction technique that tries to preserve the pairwise distances between the original data points in a lower-dimensional space.

Option C is incorrect because setting the predictor type to regressor would change the model's objective from classification to regression, which is not suitable for the given problem. A regressor model would output a continuous value instead of a binary label for each phone.

Option D is incorrect because using the SageMaker k-means algorithm with k of less than 1,000 would not help the model classify the phones, as k-means is a clustering algorithm that groups the data points into k clusters based on their similarity, without using any labels. A clustering model would not output a binary label for each phone.

References:

Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner Algorithm

Amazon SageMaker K-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) Algorithm

[Principal Component Analysis - Scikit-learn]

[Multidimensional Scaling - Scikit-learn]


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Charolette
3 months ago
Totally agree, dimensionality reduction is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
3 months ago
Wait, can you really use k-means for this? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
3 months ago
I think k-NN might work better than linear learner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
4 months ago
PCA is a solid choice for reducing features!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
4 months ago
F1 score of 0.6 isn't great, needs improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
4 months ago
Setting the predictor type to regressor seems off for a classification problem, but I wonder if there are scenarios where that might help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where feature reduction improved the F1 score, but I can't recall if PCA or MDS was the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
4 months ago
I think using k-NN could be a good option since it considers the distance between points, but I’m unsure about the dimension reduction target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
5 months ago
I remember that reducing features can help with model performance, but I'm not sure if PCA or MDS is better for this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
5 months ago
The question is a bit tricky, but I think I have a good plan. I'll try both the PCA and MDS approaches to see which one works better. I might also experiment with different hyperparameters for the linear learner model to see if that helps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about using k-means or k-NN here. Those seem more like clustering algorithms, and the question is asking about improving a classification model. I think I'll focus on the feature reduction techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Reducing the number of features is definitely the way to go, and PCA or MDS seem like the best options. I'd probably start with PCA since it's a bit more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I'm a bit confused about the different feature reduction techniques mentioned. I'll need to think carefully about which ones would be most appropriate for improving the model's F1 score.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. The key is to reduce the number of features, since the model is currently using all 2,000 diagnostic values. I'd try either the PCA or MDS approach to see which one works better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
5 months ago
I remember learning about interaction volume templates in class, so I think the 1 week duration is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
1 year ago
Hey, I've got a crazy idea – what if we just throw a bunch of random numbers at the model and see what sticks? I mean, it worked for that guy who won the lottery, right? Just kidding, but seriously, PCA is probably the way to go. Gotta streamline those features!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
1 year ago
This is a tough one, but I'm thinking the PCA route is the way to go. Reduce those features, baby! And who knows, maybe we'll stumble upon some hidden gems in the data. It's like a treasure hunt, but with smartphones instead of gold!
upvoted 0 times
Victor
1 year ago
A: Good point! Combining PCA with k-nearest neighbors could really boost our model's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 year ago
B: I think we should also consider using k-nearest neighbors for dimension reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
1 year ago
A: Yeah, I agree. PCA could help simplify things and maybe uncover some valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
1 year ago
Hold up, are we sure we can't just set the predictor type to regressor and call it a day? That sounds like the easy way out, but hey, sometimes the simplest solutions are the best, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
1 year ago
I reckon the k-NN algorithm is the way to go. Gotta love those nearest neighbors, they always have your back! Plus, with dimension reduction, we can really streamline the model and get it humming along nicely.
upvoted 0 times
Shalon
1 year ago
A: Definitely, it's all about streamlining the process and getting the model to work smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
1 year ago
B: I agree, nearest neighbors are always reliable. Plus, reducing the dimensions can make the model more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
1 year ago
A: I think option E is the best choice. Using the k-nearest neighbors algorithm with dimension reduction can really help improve the model's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronika
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe trying option E with k-nearest neighbors could also be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
1 year ago
I agree with Paulina. Reducing the number of features with PCA can make the model more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say reducing the number of features with PCA is the way to go. That should help the model focus on the most important variables and improve the F1 score. And who knows, maybe we'll uncover some hidden insights in the process!
upvoted 0 times
Susy
1 year ago
B: Definitely worth a try. It could lead to a more efficient and effective model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
1 year ago
A: Maybe we'll discover some interesting patterns by reducing the number of features with PCA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 year ago
B: Yeah, I agree. It's important to focus on the most relevant features for better accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
1 year ago
A: A sounds like a good idea. It could help simplify the model and improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paulina
1 year ago
I think option A could help improve the F1 score.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel