Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
Amazon MLS-C01 Exam Questions
- Amazon Specialty Certifications
- Amazon AWS Certified Machine Learning Certifications
- Topic 1: Data Engineering: It discusses creating data repositories for ML, identifying and implementing a data ingestion solution. Lastly, the topic delves into identifying and implementing a data transformation solution.
- Topic 2: Exploratory Data Analysis: This topic covers sanitizing and preparing data for modeling and performing feature engineering. Additionally, it discusses analyzing and visualizing data for ML.
- Topic 3: Modeling: The topic of modeling deals with framing business problems as ML problems, choosing the suitable model(s) for a given ML problem, training ML models. It also discusses hyperparameter optimization and evaluation of ML models.
- Topic 4: Machine Learning Implementation and Operations: Building ML solutions for performance, availability, scalability, resiliency, and fault tolerance is discussed in this topic. It also focuses on suitable ML services and features for a given problem. Lastly, the topic delves into applying basic AWS security practices to ML solutions and deploying and operationalizing ML solutions.
Free Amazon MLS-C01 Exam Actual Questions
Note: Premium Questions for MLS-C01 were last updated On Sep. 02, 2024 (see below)
A data scientist is building a forecasting model for a retail company by using the most recent 5 years of sales records that are stored in a data warehouse. The dataset contains sales records for each of the company's stores across five commercial regions The data scientist creates a working dataset with StorelD. Region. Date, and Sales Amount as columns. The data scientist wants to analyze yearly average sales for each region. The scientist also wants to compare how each region performed compared to average sales across all commercial regions.
Which visualization will help the data scientist better understand the data trend?
The best visualization for this task is to create a bar plot, faceted by year, of average sales for each region and add a horizontal line in each facet to represent average sales. This way, the data scientist can easily compare the yearly average sales for each region with the overall average sales and see the trends over time. The bar plot also allows the data scientist to see the relative performance of each region within each year and across years. The other options are less effective because they either do not show the yearly trends, do not show the overall average sales, or do not group the data by region.
References:
pandas.DataFrame.groupby --- pandas 2.1.4 documentation
pandas.DataFrame.plot.bar --- pandas 2.1.4 documentation
Matplotlib - Bar Plot - Online Tutorials Library
A data scientist uses Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler to define and perform transformations and feature engineering on historical dat
a. The data scientist saves the transformations to SageMaker Feature Store.
The historical data is periodically uploaded to an Amazon S3 bucket. The data scientist needs to transform the new historic data and add it to the online feature store The data scientist needs to prepare the .....historic data for training and inference by using native integrations.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST development effort?
The best solution is to configure Amazon EventBridge to run a predefined SageMaker pipeline to perform the transformations when a new data is detected in the S3 bucket. This solution requires the least development effort because it leverages the native integration between EventBridge and SageMaker Pipelines, which allows you to trigger a pipeline execution based on an event rule. EventBridge can monitor the S3 bucket for new data uploads and invoke the pipeline that contains the same transformations and feature engineering steps that were defined in SageMaker Data Wrangler. The pipeline can then ingest the transformed data into the online feature store for training and inference.
The other solutions are less optimal because they require more development effort and additional services. Using AWS Lambda or AWS Step Functions would require writing custom code to invoke the SageMaker pipeline and handle any errors or retries. Using Apache Airflow would require setting up and maintaining an Airflow server and DAGs, as well as integrating with the SageMaker API.
References:
Amazon EventBridge and Amazon SageMaker Pipelines integration
Create a pipeline using a JSON specification
Ingest data into a feature group
A law firm handles thousands of contracts every day. Every contract must be signed. Currently, a lawyer manually checks all contracts for signatures.
The law firm is developing a machine learning (ML) solution to automate signature detection for each contract. The ML solution must also provide a confidence score for each contract page.
Which Amazon Textract API action can the law firm use to generate a confidence score for each page of each contract?
The AnalyzeDocument API action is the best option to generate a confidence score for each page of each contract. This API action analyzes an input document for relationships between detected items. The input document can be an image file in JPEG or PNG format, or a PDF file. The output is a JSON structure that contains the extracted data from the document. The FeatureTypes parameter specifies the types of analysis to perform on the document. The available feature types are TABLES, FORMS, and SIGNATURES. By setting the FeatureTypes parameter to SIGNATURES, the API action will detect and extract information about signatures from the document. The output will include a list of SignatureDetection objects, each containing information about a detected signature, such as its location and confidence score. The confidence score is a value between 0 and 100 that indicates the probability that the detected signature is correct. The output will also include a list of Block objects, each representing a document page. Each Block object will have a Page attribute that contains the page number and a Confidence attribute that contains the confidence score for the page. The confidence score for the page is the average of the confidence scores of the blocks that are detected on the page. The law firm can use the AnalyzeDocument API action to generate a confidence score for each page of each contract by using the SIGNATURES feature type and returning the confidence scores from the SignatureDetection and Block objects.
The other options are not suitable for generating a confidence score for each page of each contract. The Prediction API call is not an Amazon Textract API action, but a generic term for making inference requests to a machine learning model. The StartDocumentAnalysis API action is used to start an asynchronous job to analyze a document. The output is a job identifier (JobId) that is used to get the results of the analysis with the GetDocumentAnalysis API action. The GetDocumentAnalysis API action is used to get the results of a document analysis started by the StartDocumentAnalysis API action. The output is a JSON structure that contains the extracted data from the document. However, both the StartDocumentAnalysis and the GetDocumentAnalysis API actions do not support the SIGNATURES feature type, and therefore cannot detect signatures or provide confidence scores for them.
References:
* AnalyzeDocument
* SignatureDetection
* Block
* Amazon Textract launches the ability to detect signatures on any document
A machine learning engineer is building a bird classification model. The engineer randomly separates a dataset into a training dataset and a validation dataset. During the training phase, the model achieves very high accuracy. However, the model did not generalize well during validation of the validation dataset. The engineer realizes that the original dataset was imbalanced.
What should the engineer do to improve the validation accuracy of the model?
Stratified sampling is a technique that preserves the class distribution of the original dataset when creating a smaller or split dataset. This means that the proportion of examples from each class in the original dataset is maintained in the smaller or split dataset. Stratified sampling can help improve the validation accuracy of the model by ensuring that the validation dataset is representative of the original dataset and not biased towards any class. This can reduce the variance and overfitting of the model and increase its generalization ability. Stratified sampling can be applied to both oversampling and undersampling methods, depending on whether the goal is to increase or decrease the size of the dataset.
The other options are not effective ways to improve the validation accuracy of the model. Acquiring additional data about the majority classes in the original dataset will only increase the imbalance and make the model more biased towards the majority classes. Using a smaller, randomly sampled version of the training dataset will not guarantee that the class distribution is preserved and may result in losing important information from the minority classes. Performing systematic sampling on the original dataset will also not ensure that the class distribution is preserved and may introduce sampling bias if the original dataset is ordered or grouped by class.
References:
* Stratified Sampling for Imbalanced Datasets
* Imbalanced Data
* Tour of Data Sampling Methods for Imbalanced Classification
A machine learning (ML) developer for an online retailer recently uploaded a sales dataset into Amazon SageMaker Studio. The ML developer wants to obtain importance scores for each feature of the dataset. The ML developer will use the importance scores to feature engineer the dataset.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST development effort?
SageMaker Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Quick Model visualization, which can be used to quickly evaluate the data and produce importance scores for each feature. A feature importance score indicates how useful a feature is at predicting a target label. The feature importance score is between [0, 1] and a higher number indicates that the feature is more important to the whole dataset. The Quick Model visualization uses a random forest model to calculate the feature importance for each feature using the Gini importance method. This method measures the total reduction in node impurity (a measure of how well a node separates the classes) that is attributed to splitting on a particular feature. The ML developer can use the Quick Model visualization to obtain the importance scores for each feature of the dataset and use them to feature engineer the dataset. This solution requires the least development effort compared to the other options.
References:
* Analyze and Visualize
* Detect multicollinearity, target leakage, and feature correlation with Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler
- Select Question Types you want
- Set your Desired Pass Percentage
- Allocate Time (Hours : Minutes)
- Create Multiple Practice tests with Limited Questions
- Customer Support
Dalene
4 days agoKayleigh
19 days agoRoyal
2 months agoElza
2 months agoHerman
2 months agoGlory
3 months agoTherese
3 months ago