Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon ANS-C01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 62 Discussion

A company runs applications in two VPCs that are in separate AWS Regions. One VPC is in the us-east-1 Region. The second VPC is in the us-west-1 Region. The company needs to establish connectivity between the two VPCs. The company also needs to connect the VPCs to applications that run in an on-premises data center.The current traffic requirement between the VPCs is 50 per month. The company expects traffic volume between the VPCs to increase. The traffic requirement from the VPCs to the on-premises data center is 10 per month. The company expects the traffic between the VPCs and the data center to remain constant.Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
A) Create a transit gateway in each Region. Create VPN connections from the transit gateways to the on-premises firewall. Create a peering connection between the transit gateways.
B) Create a virtual private gateway in each Region. Create VPN connections from the on-premises firewall to the virtual private gateways. Configure the on-premises firewall to route the traffic between the two VPCs.
C) Create a virtual private gateway in each Region. Create VPN connections from the on-premises firewall to the virtual private gateways. Create a VPC peering connection between the two VPCs.
D) Create a virtual private gateway in each Region. Create VPN connections from the on-premises firewall to the virtual private gateways. Create a VPN connection between the virtual private gateways.

Amazon ANS-C01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 4
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company runs applications in two VPCs that are in separate AWS Regions. One VPC is in the us-east-1 Region. The second VPC is in the us-west-1 Region. The company needs to establish connectivity between the two VPCs. The company also needs to connect the VPCs to applications that run in an on-premises data center.

The current traffic requirement between the VPCs is 50 per month. The company expects traffic volume between the VPCs to increase. The traffic requirement from the VPCs to the on-premises data center is 10 per month. The company expects the traffic between the VPCs and the data center to remain constant.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Traffic Volume Consideration: The traffic volume between the VPCs (50 TB per month and increasing) justifies the use of transit gateways, which are designed for scalable, high-throughput interconnectivity. A VPC peering connection would not scale as efficiently for this traffic volume.

On-Premises Connectivity: Establishing VPN connections from the on-premises firewall to the transit gateways ensures secure connectivity between the on-premises data center and both VPCs.

Transit Gateway Peering: Creating a peering connection between the transit gateways allows for efficient inter-Region communication between the VPCs without routing through the on-premises data center, reducing latency and costs.

Cost Efficiency: Transit gateway peering provides a cost-effective solution for large inter-Region traffic volumes compared to alternatives like routing all traffic through the on-premises data center, which would incur higher egress costs and potentially create a bottleneck.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Aaron
26 days ago
I think B is more straightforward for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
1 month ago
Option A seems like the best choice for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
2 months ago
I vaguely remember that using a transit gateway might be more scalable for future traffic increases, but I’m not confident if it’s the best fit for this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
2 months ago
I feel like VPC peering could be a good choice, but I can't recall if it supports the traffic requirements we have. I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because it mentions virtual private gateways and VPNs, which we practiced in a similar question. But I'm not entirely sure about the routing part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
I remember studying about transit gateways and how they can simplify connectivity between multiple VPCs, but I'm not sure if they're the most cost-effective option here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel