A company has its production VPC (VPC-A) in the eu-west-1 Region in Account 1. VPC-A is attached to a transit gateway (TGW-A) that is connected to an on-premises data center in Dublin, Ireland, by an AWS Direct Connect transit VIF that is configured for an AWS Direct Connect gateway. The company also has a staging VPC (VPC-B) that is attached to another transit gateway (TGW-B) in the eu-west-2 Region in Account 2.
A network engineer must implement connectivity between VPC-B and the on-premises data center in Dublin.
Which solutions will meet these requirements? (Choose two.)
B . Associate TGW-B with the Direct Connect gateway. Advertise the VPC-B CIDR block under the allowed prefixes. This will allow traffic from VPC-B to be sent over the Direct Connect connection to the on-premises data center via TGW-B. C. Configure another transit VIF on the Direct Connect connection and associate TGW-B. Advertise the VPC-B CIDR block under the allowed prefixes. This will enable the use of the Direct Connect connection for VPC-B's traffic by connecting TGW-B to the Direct Connect gateway.
A company runs applications in two VPCs that are in separate AWS Regions. One VPC is in the us-east-1 Region. The second VPC is in the us-west-1 Region. The company needs to establish connectivity between the two VPCs. The company also needs to connect the VPCs to applications that run in an on-premises data center.
The current traffic requirement between the VPCs is 50 per month. The company expects traffic volume between the VPCs to increase. The traffic requirement from the VPCs to the on-premises data center is 10 per month. The company expects the traffic between the VPCs and the data center to remain constant.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Traffic Volume Consideration: The traffic volume between the VPCs (50 TB per month and increasing) justifies the use of transit gateways, which are designed for scalable, high-throughput interconnectivity. A VPC peering connection would not scale as efficiently for this traffic volume.
On-Premises Connectivity: Establishing VPN connections from the on-premises firewall to the transit gateways ensures secure connectivity between the on-premises data center and both VPCs.
Transit Gateway Peering: Creating a peering connection between the transit gateways allows for efficient inter-Region communication between the VPCs without routing through the on-premises data center, reducing latency and costs.
Cost Efficiency: Transit gateway peering provides a cost-effective solution for large inter-Region traffic volumes compared to alternatives like routing all traffic through the on-premises data center, which would incur higher egress costs and potentially create a bottleneck.
A company has an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection between AWS and its branch office. A network engineer is troubleshooting connectivity issues that the connection is experiencing. The VPN connection terminates at a transit gateway and is statically routed. In the transit gateway route table, there are several static route entries that target specific subnets at the branch office.
The network engineer determines that the root cause of the issues was the expansion of underlying subnet ranges in the branch office during routine maintenance.
Which solution will solve this problem with the LEAST administrative overhead for future expansion efforts?
An online retail company is running a web application in the us-west-2 Region and serves consumers in the United States. The company plans to expand across several countries in Europe and wants to provide low latency for all its users.
The application needs to identify the users' IP addresses and provide localized content based on the users' geographic location. The application uses HTTP GET and POST methods for its functionality. The company also needs to develop a failover mechanism that works for GET and POST methods and is based on health checks. The failover must occur in less than 1 minute for all clients.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
A company is using Amazon Route 53 Resolver DNS Firewall in a VPC to block all domains except domains that are on an approved list. The company is concerned that if DNS Firewall is unresponsive, resources in the VPC might be affected if the network cannot resolve any DNS queries. To maintain application service level agreements, the company needs DNS queries to continue to resolve even if Route 53 Resolver does not receive a response from DNS Firewall.
Which change should a network engineer implement to meet these requirements?
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!
Daron
19 days agoAllene
26 days agoFabiola
1 month agoAliza
1 month agoDorian
2 months agoBuddy
2 months agoTalia
2 months agoDeja
2 months agoChaya
3 months agoShelba
3 months agoViki
3 months agoVirgie
3 months agoLaurel
4 months agoCurt
4 months agoElsa
4 months agoChauncey
4 months agoVirgie
5 months agoOliva
5 months agoRenay
5 months agoValentin
5 months agoTricia
6 months agoYuriko
6 months agoJamika
6 months agoJustine
6 months agoDana
7 months agoCelestina
7 months agoGearldine
7 months agoZena
7 months agoBelen
8 months agoYvonne
8 months agoShaun
10 months agoTheodora
10 months agoTambra
11 months agoElliott
12 months agoStephen
1 year agoEveline
1 year agoYoko
1 year agoRolf
1 year agoMireya
1 year agoLaura
1 year agoFairy
1 year agoAnnmarie
1 year agoKirby
1 year agoGlynda
1 year agoChana
1 year agoLenna
1 year agoFelicia
1 year agoKathrine
1 year agoHobert
1 year agoTheola
1 year agoAnnita
1 year agoGilberto
1 year agoJeffrey
1 year agoMohammad
1 year agoSuzi
1 year agoMaynard
1 year agoCristina
2 years agoDona
2 years agoWilson
2 years agoMyra
2 years agoLeonie
2 years agoDino
2 years agoKris
2 years agoQuinn
2 years agoCheryl
2 years agoClay
2 years agoDorothea
2 years agoBecky
2 years agoMa
2 years agoReuben
2 years agoLinsey
2 years ago