Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon AIF-C01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

A company has built an image classification model to predict plant diseases from photos of plant leaves. The company wants to evaluate how many images the model classified correctly.Which evaluation metric should the company use to measure the model's performance?
B) Accuracy
A) R-squared score
C) Root mean squared error (RMSE)
D) Learning rate

Amazon AIF-C01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's AIF-C01 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 4
[All AIF-C01 Questions]

A company has built an image classification model to predict plant diseases from photos of plant leaves. The company wants to evaluate how many images the model classified correctly.

Which evaluation metric should the company use to measure the model's performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Sherly at Oct 24, 2024, 06:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AIF-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rosendo
9 months ago
Learning rate? That doesn't even measure performance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
9 months ago
RMSE is for regression, not classification!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
10 months ago
Wait, why not use R-squared? Isn't that useful too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
10 months ago
Definitely, accuracy makes sense for classification tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
10 months ago
I think accuracy is the way to go for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
10 months ago
Learning rate doesn't seem like an evaluation metric at all; it's more about how the model learns during training, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
11 months ago
I feel like RMSE is also not suitable here, but I can't recall why exactly. It seems more for continuous values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember we discussed R-squared being more relevant for regression tasks, not classification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
11 months ago
I think the accuracy metric might be the right choice since we're looking at how many images were classified correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know accuracy is a common metric for classification models, but I'm wondering if there might be some nuance I'm missing. Maybe I should review the definitions of the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Accuracy seems like the most logical choice since we're evaluating a classification model. R-squared is more for regression problems, and RMSE is also for regression. Learning rate is a hyperparameter, not an evaluation metric. I'm pretty confident accuracy is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
11 months ago
Accuracy makes sense, but I'm not sure if that's the only option. I might need to think through the other choices to see if any of them could also work for this type of model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems pretty straightforward. I think accuracy would be the best metric to use here since the goal is to measure how many images the model classified correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
2 years ago
D) Learning rate? Haha, that's clearly not the right metric for evaluating image classification. Might as well go with a random number generator for that one.
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
2 years ago
C) Root mean squared error (RMSE)
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 years ago
B) Accuracy
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
2 years ago
A) R-squared score
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jennifer
2 years ago
I'm torn between B) Accuracy and C) RMSE. Guess I'll have to do some more research to decide.
upvoted 0 times
Tamala
2 years ago
RMSE is more suitable for regression tasks, so I would stick with Accuracy for this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
2 years ago
Accuracy is definitely the way to go for evaluating the performance of your image classification model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
2 years ago
I agree, Accuracy is a good choice for evaluating image classification models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
2 years ago
I think you should go with B) Accuracy. It's a common metric for classification models.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nilsa
2 years ago
I'd say C) Root mean squared error (RMSE) is the way to go. It gives a more nuanced view of the model's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
2 years ago
Definitely going with B) Accuracy. It's the most straightforward way to measure how many images the model correctly classified.
upvoted 0 times
Nathan
2 years ago
User 4: Accuracy it is then, let's see how well the model performed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
2 years ago
User 3: I agree, it's the most straightforward metric to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, accuracy is the best way to measure performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 years ago
User 1: I think we should go with B) Accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Destiny
2 years ago
I agree with Dulce. Accuracy would be the best metric to measure how many images the model classified correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
2 years ago
I think the company should use Accuracy as the evaluation metric.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel