Why does overfilting occur in ML models?
Overfitting occurs when an ML model learns the training data too well, including noise and patterns that do not generalize to new data. A key cause of overfitting is when the training dataset does not represent all possible input values, leading the model to over-specialize on the limited data it was trained on, failing to generalize to unseen data.
Exact Extract from AWS AI Documents:
From the Amazon SageMaker Developer Guide:
'Overfitting often occurs when the training dataset is not representative of the broader population of possible inputs, causing the model to memorize specific patterns, including noise, rather than learning generalizable features.'
(Source: Amazon SageMaker Developer Guide, Model Evaluation and Overfitting)
Detailed
Option A: The training dataset does not represent all possible input values.This is the correct answer. If the training dataset lacks diversity and does not cover the range of possible inputs, the model overfits by learning patterns specific to the training data, failing to generalize.
Option B: The model contains a regularization method.Regularization methods (e.g., L2 regularization) are used to prevent overfitting, not cause it. This option is incorrect.
Option C: The model training stops early because of an early stopping criterion.Early stopping is a technique to prevent overfitting by halting training when performance on a validation set degrades. It does not cause overfitting.
Option D: The training dataset contains too many features.While too many features can contribute to overfitting (e.g., by increasing model complexity), this is less directly tied to overfitting than a non-representative dataset. The dataset's representativeness is the primary cause.
Amazon SageMaker Developer Guide: Model Evaluation and Overfitting (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/latest/dg/model-evaluation.html)
AWS AI Practitioner Learning Path: Module on Model Performance and Evaluation
AWS Documentation: Understanding Overfitting (https://aws.amazon.com/machine-learning/)
A company makes forecasts each quarter to decide how to optimize operations to meet expected demand. The company uses ML models to make these forecasts.
An AI practitioner is writing a report about the trained ML models to provide transparency and explainability to company stakeholders.
What should the AI practitioner include in the report to meet the transparency and explainability requirements?
Partial dependence plots (PDPs) are visual tools used to show the relationship between a feature (or a set of features) in the data and the predicted outcome of a machine learning model. They are highly effective for providing transparency and explainability of the model's behavior to stakeholders by illustrating how different input variables impact the model's predictions.
Option B (Correct): 'Partial dependence plots (PDPs)': This is the correct answer because PDPs help to interpret how the model's predictions change with varying values of input features, providing stakeholders with a clearer understanding of the model's decision-making process.
Option A: 'Code for model training' is incorrect because providing the raw code for model training may not offer transparency or explainability to non-technical stakeholders.
Option C: 'Sample data for training' is incorrect as sample data alone does not explain how the model works or its decision-making process.
Option D: 'Model convergence tables' is incorrect. While convergence tables can show the training process, they do not provide insights into how input features affect the model's predictions.
AWS AI Practitioner Reference:
Explainability in AWS Machine Learning: AWS provides various tools for model explainability, such as Amazon SageMaker Clarify, which includes PDPs to help explain the impact of different features on the model's predictions.
[AI and ML Concepts]
Which option is a benefit of using Amazon SageMaker Model Cards to document AI models?
Amazon SageMaker Model Cards provide a standardized way to document important details about an AI model, such as its purpose, performance, intended usage, and known limitations. This enables transparency and compliance while fostering better communication between stakeholders. It does not store models physically or optimize computational requirements. Reference: AWS SageMaker Model Cards Documentation.
A company has developed an ML model for image classification. The company wants to deploy the model to production so that a web application can use the model.
The company needs to implement a solution to host the model and serve predictions without managing any of the underlying infrastructure.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Amazon SageMaker Serverless Inference is the correct solution for deploying an ML model to production in a way that allows a web application to use the model without the need to manage the underlying infrastructure.
Amazon SageMaker Serverless Inference provides a fully managed environment for deploying machine learning models. It automatically provisions, scales, and manages the infrastructure required to host the model, removing the need for the company to manage servers or other underlying infrastructure.
Why Option A is Correct:
No Infrastructure Management: SageMaker Serverless Inference handles the infrastructure management for deploying and serving ML models. The company can simply provide the model and specify the required compute capacity, and SageMaker will handle the rest.
Cost-Effectiveness: The serverless inference option is ideal for applications with intermittent or unpredictable traffic, as the company only pays for the compute time consumed while handling requests.
Integration with Web Applications: This solution allows the model to be easily accessed by web applications via RESTful APIs, making it an ideal choice for hosting the model and serving predictions.
Why Other Options are Incorrect:
B . Use Amazon CloudFront to deploy the model: CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) service for distributing content, not for deploying ML models or serving predictions.
C . Use Amazon API Gateway to host the model and serve predictions: API Gateway is used for creating, deploying, and managing APIs, but it does not provide the infrastructure or the required environment to host and run ML models.
D . Use AWS Batch to host the model and serve predictions: AWS Batch is designed for running batch computing workloads and is not optimized for real-time inference or hosting machine learning models.
Thus, A is the correct answer, as it aligns with the requirement of deploying an ML model without managing any underlying infrastructure.
An AI company periodically evaluates its systems and processes with the help of independent software vendors (ISVs). The company needs to receive email message notifications when an ISV's compliance reports become available.
Which AWS service can the company use to meet this requirement?
AWS Data Exchange is a service that allows companies to securely exchange data with third parties, such as independent software vendors (ISVs). AWS Data Exchange can be configured to provide notifications, including email notifications, when new datasets or compliance reports become available.
Option D (Correct): 'AWS Data Exchange': This is the correct answer because it enables the company to receive notifications, including email messages, when ISVs' compliance reports are available.
Option A: 'AWS Audit Manager' is incorrect because it focuses on assessing an organization's own compliance, not receiving third-party compliance reports.
Option B: 'AWS Artifact' is incorrect as it provides access to AWS's compliance reports, not ISVs'.
Option C: 'AWS Trusted Advisor' is incorrect as it offers optimization and best practices guidance, not compliance report notifications.
AWS AI Practitioner Reference:
AWS Data Exchange Documentation: AWS explains how Data Exchange allows organizations to subscribe to third-party data and receive notifications when updates are available.
Sylvia
5 days agoLonna
19 days agoCristal
21 days agoMargarita
1 months agoZachary
2 months agoJoanna
2 months agoHarley
3 months agoHassie
3 months agoClay
3 months agoAvery
4 months agoMerri
4 months agoShelia
4 months agoGene
5 months agoCletus
5 months agoAmmie
5 months agoEthan
5 months agoJosefa
6 months agoTiera
6 months agoGarry
6 months agoEdmond
6 months agoBernardo
6 months agoAlyce
7 months agoNatalie
7 months agoLenna
7 months agoLuisa
7 months agoAgustin
7 months agoVerlene
8 months agoGlory
8 months agoThaddeus
8 months agoBrendan
9 months agoIluminada
9 months agoGlory
9 months agoSharee
9 months agoAlonzo
9 months agoDoug
10 months agoFletcher
10 months agoRolland
10 months agoFanny
10 months agoSalome
10 months agoVannessa
11 months ago