Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Worldatwork GR1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 64 Discussion

If the beginning wage needed to recruit quality candidates for given job is higher than that of incumbents who have been with a company for some time, what type of pay adjustment should be used to correct this discrepancy?
D) Market
A) Cost-of-living
B) Tenure
C) Automatic

Worldatwork GR1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Worldatwork's GR1 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 2
[All GR1 Questions]

If the beginning wage needed to recruit quality candidates for given job is higher than that of incumbents who have been with a company for some time, what type of pay adjustment should be used to correct this discrepancy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Dalene at Nov 22, 2023, 07:36 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GR1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Judy
8 months ago
Not sure if market adjustments will fix the morale issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
8 months ago
Wait, are we really paying new hires more than veterans?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
9 months ago
Market adjustments are the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
9 months ago
I think tenure pay adjustments make more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
9 months ago
Definitely a market adjustment needed here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused. Wouldn't a cost-of-living adjustment be more about inflation rather than recruiting new talent?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I believe the answer was market adjustment too. It makes sense to align wages with the current market rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about tenure adjustments being used for long-term employees. Could that apply here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
10 months ago
I think this might be a market adjustment since it relates to the competitive pay for new hires compared to current employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
10 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The question is asking about a discrepancy between new hires and incumbents, so the obvious solution is a "Tenure" adjustment to reward the longer-serving employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. If new hires are being paid more than current employees, we need to adjust the pay for the incumbents. I'm thinking the "Market" adjustment might be the way to go here, to bring their pay in line with the current market rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know it has to do with pay adjustments, but I'm not sure which one would be the best fit for this scenario. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about pay adjustments. I think the key is to identify the type of pay adjustment that would correct the discrepancy between new hires and incumbent employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
10 months ago
Fluid dynamics? That's definitely not an influence of service-orientation. I'm pretty confident that's the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
10 months ago
I remember from my cardiac rehab lecture that sensitivity tells us how many true positives we'll detect. Probably around 70% sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
10 months ago
Wait, is this a with or without replacement problem? I'm not sure if the digits are independent or if the 0 and 7 have to be the last two digits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. If the user can't find the Contact record, then the Note record is probably the best way to track down the information we need. Searching for "running" should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 year ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I feel like I'm being asked to play 'Guess the Compensation Strategy.'
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
1 year ago
Wow, this is a real head-scratcher! Time to put on my thinking cap and channel my inner economist.
upvoted 0 times
Santos
1 year ago
D) Market
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 year ago
C) Automatic
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
1 year ago
B) Tenure
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
1 year ago
A) Cost-of-living
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
1 year ago
A) Cost-of-living? Really? That's hardly going to address the root issue of a pay discrepancy. D) Market is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
1 year ago
C) Automatic? That's like putting a band-aid on a bullet wound. This needs a more strategic approach.
upvoted 0 times
Paola
1 year ago
D) Market
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 year ago
B) Tenure
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 year ago
A) Cost-of-living
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deonna
1 year ago
B) Tenure adjustment? Nah, that's not gonna cut it. We need to stay competitive with the market rate.
upvoted 0 times
Dean
1 year ago
C) Automatic adjustment could be a good solution to keep up with industry standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 year ago
B) Tenure adjustment might not be enough to address the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
1 year ago
D) Market adjustment is crucial to attract top talent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
A) Cost-of-living adjustment could help bridge the gap.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sina
1 year ago
I'm not sure. Wouldn't tenure adjustment be more fair to existing employees?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
1 year ago
D) Market adjustment seems like the logical choice here. Gotta pay what the market demands to attract quality talent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 year ago
I agree with Juliann. Market adjustment makes sense to attract new talent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) Market.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel