New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

WGU (QCO1) Ethics In Technology Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for WGU's WGU (QCO1) Ethics In Technology exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All WGU (QCO1) Ethics In Technology Questions]

An organization is concerned about its cybersecurity after identifying unauthorized records in its payroll database. The organization hires a consultant to test its cyberdefenses. The consultant executes several test attacks on the organization's software and successfully demonstrates that by using Structured Query Language (SOL) injection, the consultant can add rows to the payroll database without obtaining the proper permissions.

Which hacker classification does the consultant fall under?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The consultant was hired by the organization to test its cybersecurity and identify vulnerabilities. This is the role of a white hat hacker, also known as an ethical hacker.

Why White Hat Hacker?

White hat hackers conduct security assessments legally and ethically to help organizations strengthen their cyber defenses.

The consultant demonstrated SQL injection attacks in a controlled manner to expose weaknesses without malicious intent.

Ethical hacking is a recognized practice under cybersecurity frameworks like NIST and ISO 27001.

Why Not the Other Options?

A . Cybercriminal -- Engages in illegal hacking for personal or financial gain, whereas the consultant was hired to help the organization.

C . Cyberterrorist -- Motivated by political or ideological goals, not cybersecurity testing.

D . Black Hat Hacker -- Malicious hackers who exploit vulnerabilities for personal benefit, unlike ethical hackers.

Thus, the correct answer is B. White Hat Hacker, as the consultant was conducting authorized penetration testing.

Reference in Ethics in Technology:

CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) Guidelines.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework.

OWASP Top Ten Security Risks (2023).


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Dorothy
14 hours ago
I think it's more complicated than that. Could be seen as black hat too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
6 days ago
Agreed, it's all about improving security. White hat all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
11 days ago
Lol, the consultant is a "white hat" hacker? More like a "gray hat" if you ask me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
16 days ago
B) White hat hacker. They were just doing their job, and the organization asked them to test the defenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
21 days ago
Definitely D) Black hat hacker. I don't care if they were hired, that's still illegal hacking!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
26 days ago
D) Black hat hacker. The consultant used SQL injection to gain unauthorized access, which is a malicious hacking technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
1 month ago
B) White hat hacker. The consultant was hired by the organization to test its defenses, so they are a legitimate security professional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
1 month ago
I lean towards white hat too, but I wonder if the fact that they successfully exploited the database complicates things. It’s like a fine line between ethical and unethical hacking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
1 month ago
I'm not so sure. I remember a practice question where a hacker was doing something similar but wasn't authorized. Could that make them a black hat hacker?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
2 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the consultant is a white hat hacker. They were hired to test the organization's defenses, and even though they were able to exploit a vulnerability, they were doing so with the organization's consent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused. If the consultant was able to access the payroll database without permission, wouldn't that make them a cybercriminal or black hat hacker? I'm not sure about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
2 months ago
The key here is that the consultant was hired by the organization, so they must be a white hat hacker, right? I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
2 months ago
I think the consultant is a white hat hacker since they were hired to test the organization's defenses, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
2 months ago
Definitely a white hat hacker. They're testing for vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
I feel like this is tricky. The consultant is testing vulnerabilities, but they are still exploiting them. Does that mean they could be seen as a cybercriminal?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
3 months ago
Wait, how can they just add rows without permission? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. The question says the consultant successfully demonstrated they could add rows to the payroll database without permission, which sounds more like a black hat hacker to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
3 months ago
I think the consultant is a white hat hacker since they were hired by the organization to test its defenses.
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
2 months ago
Definitely a white hat hacker! They’re helping the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel