Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-61.22 Exam - Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

A customer has asked for recommendations around a disaster recovery architecture design for VMware Workspace ONE Access. The customer has an extremely aggressive recovery point objective and recovery time objective.Which HA/DR design should be recommended, given the supported options?
D) Multi-datacenter design with two 3-node clusters, Both 3-node clusters are spanned across both datacenters, two nodes in one datacenter and one in the other, respectively. The two 3-node clusters are setup in an active/passive configuration.
A) Multi-datacenter design with two 3-node clusters, One 3-node cluster Datacenter 1 and the other 3-node cluster m Datacenter 2. The two 3-node clusters are setup in an active/passive configuration.
B) Multi-datacenter design with two 3-node clusters. One 3-node cluster Datacenter 1 and the other 3-node cluster m Datacenter 2. The two 3-node clusters are setup in an active/active configuration.
C) Multi datacenter design with two 3-node clusters, Both 3-node clusters are spanned across both datacenters, two nodes in one datacenter and one in the other, respectively. The two 3-node clusters are setup in an active/active configuration.

VMware 5V0-61.22 Exam - Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-61.22 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All 5V0-61.22 Questions]

A customer has asked for recommendations around a disaster recovery architecture design for VMware Workspace ONE Access. The customer has an extremely aggressive recovery point objective and recovery time objective.

Which HA/DR design should be recommended, given the supported options?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Loren at Feb 11, 2024, 08:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-61.22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Marget
10 months ago
I disagree, C could lead to performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
10 months ago
Surprised there's no mention of backup solutions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
10 months ago
Active/active setups can be tricky, but they might work here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
11 months ago
I think A is better for simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
11 months ago
Option B seems solid for aggressive RPO/RTO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m uncertain about how the node distribution affects performance and recovery objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
11 months ago
I feel like option B could be the right choice since it allows for load balancing and redundancy, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
11 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where active/passive setups were recommended for strict RPO/RTO requirements. Maybe that's relevant?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
12 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of active/active configurations for minimizing downtime, but I'm not sure if that's the best fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
12 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. What exactly does "spanned across both datacenters" mean? I want to make sure I fully understand the differences between the design options before I make a recommendation. Maybe I'll need to do some additional research on VMware Workspace ONE Access HA/DR architectures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
12 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Based on the aggressive RPO and RTO requirements, I would recommend option C - the multi-datacenter design with two 3-node clusters spanned across both datacenters in an active/active configuration. This should provide the highest level of availability and the fastest recovery times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking for a specific HA/DR design recommendation, but there are a few different options presented. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between active/passive and active/active configurations before I can decide which one to recommend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
12 months ago
This seems like a tricky question, but I think I can work through it. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements for aggressive RPO and RTO, and then evaluate the different design options to see which one best meets those needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the specifics of the 802.1X configuration here. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the different options for handling re-authentication failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover a range of software management capabilities, but I'm not entirely clear on the specific functionality of Performance Analytics. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
12 months ago
This is a good opportunity to apply the knowledge we've gained. I'll take my time, analyze each statement, and select the ones that don't align with the Compensating Service Transaction pattern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the Redirect Server is responsible for sending "302 Moved Temporarily" responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
1 year ago
Personally, I'd go with option B. It's simpler to set up and maintain, and the customer is looking for a quick recovery. Who needs redundancy when you can just fail over to the other site, right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Jesusita
1 year ago
Definitely, option B seems like the most efficient solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
1 year ago
I agree, simplicity is important when dealing with aggressive recovery objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
1 year ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. Quick recovery is key in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Isn't option B the same as option C, just with a different description? Why would we need two separate active/active setups?
upvoted 0 times
Leana
1 year ago
The choice between the two would depend on factors like network latency, data replication, and failover requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
1 year ago
Option B has separate active/active setups in each datacenter, while option C has nodes spanned across both datacenters in an active/active configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
1 year ago
Option B and C may seem similar, but the key difference lies in how the nodes are distributed across the datacenters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laine
1 year ago
I'm not entirely convinced. Option D might be a more robust solution, with an active/passive setup. That way, we have a dedicated failover site ready to take over in case of disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Pura
1 year ago
Let's go with Option D for the disaster recovery architecture design.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
1 year ago
I agree, having an active/passive setup provides a dedicated failover site for quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
1 year ago
I think Option D is the best choice for our aggressive recovery objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giuseppe
1 year ago
That's a good point, option C does offer more redundancy. I see your perspective now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
1 year ago
Option C looks like the best fit for the customer's requirements. Active/active configuration with nodes spanning both datacenters ensures high availability and quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
Kendra
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincent
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C would be more suitable because it provides better redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel