VMware 5V0-41.20 Exam - Topic 2 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-41.20 exam

Question #: 23
Topic #: 2

Scenario 2:

After completing the branch activation activities for all required branches, the network administrator attempts to test connectivity between the various branches and between the hubs and branches. The administrator notices a lack of connectivity despite being certain that configurations have been complete. The administrator also observed that several users are reporting intermittent connectivity to some of the applications they are accessing. Other users are reporting no access to these applications. Other users at some of the branches claim they cannot get to certain public resources. The administrator wants to ensure that all sites can talk to each other and all resources are accessible.

Exhibit.

The tunnel from spoke to hub is not coming up. What are the two possible reasons? (Choose two.)

ASpoke Edge and hub Edge are two different Edge models.

BSpoke Edge and hub Edge have a mismatch certificate authentication mode.

CHub WAN Interface might be behind the NAT Device or firewall.

DDynamic Branch to Branch is not enabled.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

by Melissa at May 08, 2022, 09:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-41.20 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Bettyann

4 months ago

Not convinced it's just a config issue, something feels off here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

4 months ago

I think dynamic branch to branch needs to be checked too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jonelle

4 months ago

Wait, are we sure the Edge models are different? That seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenise

4 months ago

Definitely a certificate mismatch, I've seen that happen before.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martha

4 months ago

Could be a NAT issue with the hub WAN interface.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

5 months ago

I thought I read that different edge models could lead to issues too, but I'm not completely confident about that one. It seems like there are multiple potential reasons here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

5 months ago

This scenario feels familiar. I practiced a question where dynamic branch-to-branch was a key point. If that's not enabled, it could definitely cause problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Renea

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think NAT could also be a factor. If the hub is behind a NAT device, it might not be reachable from the spokes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shay

5 months ago

I remember something about certificate mismatches causing issues with connectivity. That could definitely be a reason for the tunnel not coming up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adria

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know CMDB stands for Configuration Management Database, but I'm not entirely sure which specific tables would be considered the "key" ones. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

5 months ago

Deleting an agent, even an inactive one, could still impact the overall queue performance, so I'm going to say A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

5 months ago

I think the Trusted Subsystem pattern might be a good approach here. By abstracting the new identity management system behind a utility service, we can reduce the load on that system and still handle the authentication requirements for Service A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

5 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward cash flow forecasting setup question. I think I can handle this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenny

5 months ago

Okay, I remember learning about merging cells in class. I think I can figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

William

5 months ago

I believe it's connected to the absorption of costs. If the variance is minor, they often allow for the deferral. I wonder if specific options here clarify that point.

upvoted 0 times

...