VMware 5V0-23.20 Exam - Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-23.20 exam

Question #: 27
Topic #: 4

How are quotas and permissions guaranteed by vSphere with Tanzu for Tanzu Kubernetes (TKG) clusters that are deployed within a namespace?

ABy routing quota and permission API calls to vCenter Server via the Supervisor Cluster

BBy ensuring each TKG cluster has a quotas and permissions system built into it natively which enforces all requests

CBy having the Supervisor Cluster poll the TKG cluster periodically to ensure adherence to quotas and permissions

DBy deploying an external authentication solution

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Elli at Jul 08, 2023, 01:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-23.20 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mari

5 months ago

Surprised to see so many options!

upvoted 0 times

...

Aretha

5 months ago

D seems unnecessary for this setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

5 months ago

Wait, I thought it was C? Polling sounds right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zita

6 months ago

I think B makes more sense, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

6 months ago

A is correct! It routes API calls to vCenter.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stanton

6 months ago

I don't think an external authentication solution is related to quotas and permissions in this context, so I would rule out option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darrel

6 months ago

I feel like the Supervisor Cluster polling the TKG cluster sounds familiar, but I can't recall if that's how it actually works. Maybe it's option C?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristy

6 months ago

I remember practicing a question about how TKG clusters enforce permissions, and I think it mentioned something about a built-in system. Could that be option B?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mila

7 months ago

I think quotas and permissions are managed through the Supervisor Cluster, but I'm not entirely sure if it's via API calls to vCenter or something else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

7 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on leveraging the existing on-premises setup as much as possible to keep costs down.

upvoted 0 times

...

In

7 months ago

I vaguely recall something about XML signatures being relevant for validating messages, but I'm unsure if that directly addresses encryption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonard

7 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the key usage purposes for an SSL certificate on an ESM server.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

11 months ago

I'm just glad they're not asking about how to properly provision vSphere with Tanzu clusters. That's a real headache!

upvoted 0 times

Joesph

10 months ago

B) By ensuring each TKG cluster has a quotas and permissions system built into it natively which enforces all requests

upvoted 0 times

...

Wenona

10 months ago

I know, provisioning vSphere with Tanzu clusters can be a real challenge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirby

10 months ago

C) By having the Supervisor Cluster poll the TKG cluster periodically to ensure adherence to quotas and permissions

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

11 months ago

A) By routing quota and permission API calls to vCenter Server via the Supervisor Cluster

upvoted 0 times

...

Eloisa

11 months ago

D is definitely not the answer. An external authentication solution wouldn't have anything to do with enforcing quotas and permissions.

upvoted 0 times

Fredric

10 months ago

C) By having the Supervisor Cluster poll the TKG cluster periodically to ensure adherence to quotas and permissions

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

10 months ago

B) By ensuring each TKG cluster has a quotas and permissions system built into it natively which enforces all requests

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

11 months ago

A) By routing quota and permission API calls to vCenter Server via the Supervisor Cluster

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

12 months ago

C doesn't sound right. Polling the TKG clusters periodically doesn't seem like a reliable way to ensure adherence to quotas and permissions.

upvoted 0 times

Phyliss

10 months ago

I agree, C does seem like a risky approach. A and B sound more reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

10 months ago

B) By ensuring each TKG cluster has a quotas and permissions system built into it natively which enforces all requests

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

11 months ago

A) By routing quota and permission API calls to vCenter Server via the Supervisor Cluster

upvoted 0 times

...

Ma

1 year ago

I'm not sure B is right. Each TKG cluster having its own quotas and permissions system seems redundant and inefficient.

upvoted 0 times

Margot

10 months ago

D) By deploying an external authentication solution

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

10 months ago

I agree, having the Supervisor Cluster handle the quotas and permissions centrally makes more sense

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

10 months ago

C) By having the Supervisor Cluster poll the TKG cluster periodically to ensure adherence to quotas and permissions

upvoted 0 times

...

Corinne

10 months ago

A) By routing quota and permission API calls to vCenter Server via the Supervisor Cluster

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

10 months ago

D) By deploying an external authentication solution

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlene

10 months ago

I'm not sure B is right. Each TKG cluster having its own quotas and permissions system seems redundant and inefficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerri

11 months ago

C) By having the Supervisor Cluster poll the TKG cluster periodically to ensure adherence to quotas and permissions

upvoted 0 times

...

Marge

11 months ago

A) By routing quota and permission API calls to vCenter Server via the Supervisor Cluster

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathrine

1 year ago

A seems like the correct answer. The Supervisor Cluster acts as the control plane for the TKG clusters, so it makes sense that it would handle the quota and permission enforcement.

upvoted 0 times

...