New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 3V0-752 Exam - Topic 6 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 3V0-752 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 6
[All 3V0-752 Questions]

A customer is looking to implement a VMware solution with these requirements:

* Support for 200 call center employees on a single 8-hour shift

* Application access through physical Windows 7 desktops

* Restrict access to only these applications: Google Chrome, FileZilla (an open source FTP application), and a custom in-house client-server call center application

An architect is tasked with determining the lowest cost license solution that will meet the customer's requirements.

Which solution should the architect choose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lucina
4 months ago
Not sure if named licenses are the best choice for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
4 months ago
200 concurrent licenses could work too, but named is cheaper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
4 months ago
Wait, why would you need 600 licenses? That seems excessive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
4 months ago
Definitely agree, named licenses fit the employee count perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
4 months ago
I think 200 named licenses of Horizon 7 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
5 months ago
I think the architect should choose 200 concurrent licenses. It seems like the best fit for the number of users and the shift structure, but I’m not completely confident about the cost implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the specifics of the applications being used. If they only need access to three applications, does that change the licensing requirements? I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
5 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we had to calculate the number of licenses based on user access patterns. I feel like concurrent licenses could be the way to go since they allow multiple users to share licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
5 months ago
I remember discussing the difference between named and concurrent licenses in class. I think for 200 employees, named licenses might be more cost-effective, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
5 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The PCE needs to get topology and traffic-engineering data, and the exhibit shows BGP-LS is available, so option C or D is the way to go. I'll double-check the details, but I think I've got a good handle on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where it mentioned the default route, but I can't recall specifically if both VRFs can access it or just one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
5 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the specific issue of the quick action not being displayed on the case feed. The question mentions that the administrator added the email quick action to the Case page layout, so that part is already done. The question is asking what feature needs to be enabled to ensure the quick action will be displayed as expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
5 months ago
I think options B and C are the valid and efficient approval processes based on the information provided. The amounts fall within the approval limits, and the approvals are done by the right roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. Services, account, and team leadership all sound like they could be part of Cisco's sales teams. Marketing is the only one that doesn't seem to fit, so I'll go with D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel