Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 2V0-21.23 Exam - Topic 7 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-21.23 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 7
[All 2V0-21.23 Questions]

An administrator has mapped three vSphere zones to three vSphere clusters.

Which two statements are true for this vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor enablement? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, E

For a vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor enablement where three vSphere zones are mapped to three vSphere clusters, the following two statements are true:

B)One Supervisor will be created across all zones. In a three-zone deployment, all three vSphere clusters become one Supervisor.

E)Individual vSphere Namespaces will be spread across all zones. You can distribute the nodes of your Tanzu Kubernetes Grid clusters across all three vSphere zones, thus providing HA for your Kubernetes workloads at a vSphere cluster level.


by Kiera at May 04, 2025, 04:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-21.23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Harrison
4 months ago
Individual Namespaces will be spread across all zones, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
4 months ago
A Supervisor is created in each zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
5 months ago
Definitely three Supervisors in Linked Mode!
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
5 months ago
I think it's actually one Supervisor across all zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards the idea that Namespaces are distributed across zones, but I’m not entirely confident about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
5 months ago
I feel like the Linked Mode option is a trick question. We practiced a similar question, and it was about how Supervisors interact across zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
5 months ago
I think we discussed that one Supervisor can manage multiple zones, but I can't recall if it's one for each zone or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
6 months ago
I remember something about Supervisors being zone-specific, but I'm not sure if it's one per zone or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
6 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Based on my understanding, the Supervisor is a cluster-level construct, so the correct answers are B and D. The zones are just used for namespace placement, not Supervisor creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Does "zonal Supervisor enablement" mean that Supervisors are created per zone, or is it just about how namespaces are placed? I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to remember that Supervisors are created at the cluster level, not the zone level. So the correct answers are likely B and D, since individual namespaces will be placed into specific zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the relationship between Supervisors and zones. I'll need to review my notes on vSphere with Tanzu to make sure I understand the concepts before attempting to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
7 months ago
This question seems to be testing my understanding of vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor enablement. I'll need to carefully consider the statements and think through the implications of mapping multiple vSphere zones to clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
10 months ago
I think the answer is C and D because three Supervisors will be created in Linked Mode and Individual vSphere Namespaces will be placed into a specific zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
10 months ago
Option C is interesting, but three Supervisors in Linked Mode? That sounds like a recipe for chaos. I'll go with B and D.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
9 months ago
Definitely, I would go with option B and D as well for a more streamlined approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
9 months ago
Individual vSphere Namespaces being placed into specific zones also sounds like a good idea for organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
9 months ago
I think having one Supervisor across all zones makes more sense for easier management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
10 months ago
I agree, having three Supervisors in Linked Mode does seem like it could get complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaac
10 months ago
But if one Supervisor is created in a specific zone, wouldn't that mean A is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's B and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
11 months ago
I think the correct answers are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
11 months ago
I agree with Amie, having one Supervisor across all zones would provide better visibility and control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
11 months ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to have one Supervisor across all zones for better management?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
11 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers had a field day coming up with these options. It's like a game of 'guess the right combination'.
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
10 months ago
D) Individual vSphere Namespaces will be placed into a specific zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
10 months ago
A) One Supervisor will be created in a specific zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gaston
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's B and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
11 months ago
I'm going with option E. Spreading the Namespaces across all zones seems like a more efficient way to manage the resources.
upvoted 0 times
Dong
10 months ago
Having the Namespaces spread out could also provide better fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
10 months ago
I agree, spreading the Namespaces across all zones can definitely improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
11 months ago
I think option E is the way to go too. It would help with resource management.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
11 months ago
I think the answer is A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
12 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer. It makes sense that individual vSphere Namespaces would be placed into a specific zone.
upvoted 0 times
Michael
11 months ago
I'm not sure about option B, it doesn't seem right to have one Supervisor across all zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
11 months ago
I think option A is also correct, as one Supervisor will be created in a specific zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
12 months ago
I agree, option D seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel