VMware 2V0-21.23 Exam - Topic 7 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-21.23 exam

Question #: 47
Topic #: 7

[All 2V0-21.23 Questions]

An administrator has mapped three vSphere zones to three vSphere clusters.

Which two statements are true for this vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor enablement? (Choose two.)

AOne Supervisor will be created in a specific zone.

BOne Supervisor will be created across all zones.

CThree Supervisors will be created in Linked Mode.

DIndividual vSphere Namespaces will be placed into a specific zone.

EIndividual vSphere Namespaces will be spread across all zones.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, E

For a vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor enablement where three vSphere zones are mapped to three vSphere clusters, the following two statements are true:

B)One Supervisor will be created across all zones. In a three-zone deployment, all three vSphere clusters become one Supervisor.

E)Individual vSphere Namespaces will be spread across all zones. You can distribute the nodes of your Tanzu Kubernetes Grid clusters across all three vSphere zones, thus providing HA for your Kubernetes workloads at a vSphere cluster level.

by Kiera at May 04, 2025, 04:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-21.23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Harrison

2 months ago

Individual Namespaces will be spread across all zones, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

2 months ago

Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds off to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Long

2 months ago

A Supervisor is created in each zone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samuel

3 months ago

Definitely three Supervisors in Linked Mode!

upvoted 0 times

...

Renea

3 months ago

I think it's actually one Supervisor across all zones.

upvoted 0 times

...

India

3 months ago

I’m leaning towards the idea that Namespaces are distributed across zones, but I’m not entirely confident about the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

3 months ago

I feel like the Linked Mode option is a trick question. We practiced a similar question, and it was about how Supervisors interact across zones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eulah

4 months ago

I think we discussed that one Supervisor can manage multiple zones, but I can't recall if it's one for each zone or not.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

4 months ago

I remember something about Supervisors being zone-specific, but I'm not sure if it's one per zone or something else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Becky

4 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. Based on my understanding, the Supervisor is a cluster-level construct, so the correct answers are B and D. The zones are just used for namespace placement, not Supervisor creation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malika

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Does "zonal Supervisor enablement" mean that Supervisors are created per zone, or is it just about how namespaces are placed? I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

4 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to remember that Supervisors are created at the cluster level, not the zone level. So the correct answers are likely B and D, since individual namespaces will be placed into specific zones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

5 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the relationship between Supervisors and zones. I'll need to review my notes on vSphere with Tanzu to make sure I understand the concepts before attempting to answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

5 months ago

This question seems to be testing my understanding of vSphere with Tanzu zonal Supervisor enablement. I'll need to carefully consider the statements and think through the implications of mapping multiple vSphere zones to clusters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettina

8 months ago

I think the answer is C and D because three Supervisors will be created in Linked Mode and Individual vSphere Namespaces will be placed into a specific zone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

8 months ago

Option C is interesting, but three Supervisors in Linked Mode? That sounds like a recipe for chaos. I'll go with B and D.

upvoted 0 times

Kenneth

7 months ago

Definitely, I would go with option B and D as well for a more streamlined approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebeca

7 months ago

Individual vSphere Namespaces being placed into specific zones also sounds like a good idea for organization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaynell

8 months ago

I think having one Supervisor across all zones makes more sense for easier management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebbecca

8 months ago

I agree, having three Supervisors in Linked Mode does seem like it could get complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isaac

9 months ago

But if one Supervisor is created in a specific zone, wouldn't that mean A is correct?

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

9 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's B and E.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isaac

9 months ago

I think the correct answers are A and D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

9 months ago

I agree with Amie, having one Supervisor across all zones would provide better visibility and control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

9 months ago

But wouldn't it make more sense to have one Supervisor across all zones for better management?

upvoted 0 times

...

Salina

9 months ago

Haha, I bet the exam writers had a field day coming up with these options. It's like a game of 'guess the right combination'.

upvoted 0 times

Hollis

8 months ago

D) Individual vSphere Namespaces will be placed into a specific zone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

8 months ago

A) One Supervisor will be created in a specific zone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaston

9 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's B and E.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

9 months ago

I'm going with option E. Spreading the Namespaces across all zones seems like a more efficient way to manage the resources.

upvoted 0 times

Dong

9 months ago

Having the Namespaces spread out could also provide better fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

9 months ago

I agree, spreading the Namespaces across all zones can definitely improve efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wynell

9 months ago

I think option E is the way to go too. It would help with resource management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

9 months ago

I think the answer is A and D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

10 months ago

I think option D is the correct answer. It makes sense that individual vSphere Namespaces would be placed into a specific zone.

upvoted 0 times

Michael

9 months ago

I'm not sure about option B, it doesn't seem right to have one Supervisor across all zones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candra

10 months ago

I think option A is also correct, as one Supervisor will be created in a specific zone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edelmira

10 months ago

I agree, option D seems to be the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...