Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam - Topic 4 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.24 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 4
[All 2V0-13.24 Questions]

A company will be expanding their existing VCF environment for a new application. The existing VCF environment currently has a management domain and two separate VI workload domains with different hardware profiles. The new application has the following requirements:

* The application will use significantly more memory than current workloads today.

* The application will have a limited number of licenses to run on hosts.

* Additional VCF and hardware costs have been approved for the application.

* The application will contain confidential customer information that requires isolation from other workloads.

What design recommendation should the administrator document?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The requirements demand memory capacity, licensing control, cost approval, and isolation. Option B, 'A new Workload domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements,' satisfies all: a new VI domain in VCF 5.2 isolates workloads (via separate NSX instance), uses approved funds for high-memory hardware, and allows licensing via DRS affinity rules within the domain. Option A (new VCF instance) is overkill, duplicating management overhead. Option C (management domain hardware) misuses the management domain's purpose. Option D (expanding existing cluster) risks isolation breaches. B leverages VCF's workload domain architecture effectively.


by Janet at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-13.24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Clorinda
1 day ago
Definitely need isolation for that confidential info, so A is risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
6 days ago
Surprised they’re considering a new consolidated instance at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
11 days ago
I disagree, D could work if we manage the licensing well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
17 days ago
Option B seems like the best fit for the memory needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
22 days ago
Haha, I bet the new application is for storing cat memes. Gotta have that extra memory!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
27 days ago
A) Consolidating everything into a new VCF instance? That's a bit extreme, don't you think? I'd go with the more targeted approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
2 months ago
C) Ordering new hardware for the management domain and creating a new workload domain is overkill. Why not just expand an existing cluster?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
2 months ago
D) Expanding an existing cluster and using host affinity rules to manage the licensing sounds like a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
2 months ago
B) Seems like the best option to me. A new workload domain with the right hardware to support the memory requirements is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m not confident. I feel like consolidating everything might complicate the isolation aspect we need for customer data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to consider hardware profiles. I feel like option B makes sense because it specifically addresses the memory needs of the new application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
2 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think option D could work since it mentions expanding an existing cluster. But would that really meet the isolation requirement?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
3 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of isolating workloads, especially with confidential data. So, I think a new workload domain might be the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
3 months ago
Option A of deploying a completely new VCF instance seems a bit overkill for this scenario. The existing environment can likely be expanded to accommodate the new application, so I don't think that's the best recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B as well. It seems the most direct way to address the specific memory and isolation requirements of the new application, without having to worry about the management domain or licensing complications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
3 months ago
Option D seems like it could work too, but I'm not sure how well the host affinity rules would handle the licensing requirements. That could get a bit tricky to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Option C also mentions adding a new workload domain, but it also talks about ordering additional hardware for the management domain. I'm not sure if that's necessary based on the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
4 months ago
I think option B is the best approach here. Creating a new workload domain with the right hardware to support the memory requirements of the new application seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel