VEEAM VMCE_v12 Exam - Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for VEEAM's VMCE_v12 exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 2

A business has several remote sites that are backed up to the central Veeam infrastructure. After a few months, the amount of data has grown and backup copy jobs do not fit into the backup window. The current bandwidth is 20 Mbps. Management wants to avoid any additional investments.

Which option would improve backup duration?

AAdd more RAM to central VBR Server

BIncrease bandwidth to remote sites

CUpgrade all remote instances to V12

DDeploy WAN accelerators for remote sites

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

WAN accelerators are a feature in Veeam Backup & Replication that optimize data transfer over WAN connections. By deploying WAN accelerators at both the central VBR (Veeam Backup & Replication) server location and the remote sites, data transfer can be optimized to fit into the existing backup window without the need for additional bandwidth investment. WAN accelerators work by caching repetitive patterns of data, which significantly reduces the amount of data that needs to be transferred over the network after the initial job run. This makes it a cost-effective solution for improving backup duration when bandwidth is limited.

by Kristofer at Jul 04, 2025, 02:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium VMCE_v12 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shawn

2 months ago

Surprised they want to avoid investments; that's a tough spot!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ming

3 months ago

More RAM won't really solve the backup window issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

3 months ago

I think deploying WAN accelerators is the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wynell

3 months ago

Upgrading to V12 might not make a big difference in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

3 months ago

Increasing bandwidth would definitely help!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alethea

4 months ago

Adding more RAM seems like it wouldn’t really solve the problem since it’s more about the data transfer speed, right? I’m leaning towards WAN accelerators.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dan

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question about optimizing backup jobs, and I feel like upgrading to V12 might not directly address the bandwidth issue we have here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

4 months ago

I think deploying WAN accelerators could help with the backup duration, but I’m not entirely clear on how much they would improve efficiency without additional investment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnda

4 months ago

I remember discussing how bandwidth can really impact backup times, but I’m not sure if increasing it is an option since they want to avoid extra costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

4 months ago

I'm a little confused by this question. Increasing the bandwidth seems like the obvious solution, but the management wants to avoid any additional investments. The WAN accelerator option is intriguing, but I'm not sure how it works or if it's a good fit for our setup. I'll need to do some research on that before making a decision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristeen

5 months ago

Alright, I think I've got a handle on this. The key here is to maximize the existing bandwidth without any additional investments. That means the WAN accelerator option is probably the way to go. It should help optimize the data transfer and reduce the backup duration. I'm feeling pretty confident about this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fidelia

5 months ago

Okay, let's see here. Upgrading the remote instances to V12 could potentially improve performance, but that might require additional investments that the management wants to avoid. The WAN accelerator option sounds interesting, but I'll need to research how that works and if it's a good fit for our setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure if adding more RAM to the central VBR server would really help with the backup duration issue. Increasing the bandwidth to the remote sites seems like the most straightforward solution, but I'll have to think about the cost implications.

upvoted 0 times

...