UiPath-ADAv1 Exam - Topic 13 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for UiPath's UiPath-ADAv1 exam

Question #: 23
Topic #: 13

What types of authentication are supported by Connector Builder for Integration Service?

AOAuth 2.0 Authorization Code, OAuth 2.0 Client Credentials, SSL, OAuth 2.0 Implicit Grant, LDAP, RADIUS.

BOAuth 2.0 Authorization Code, OAuth 2.0 Authorization code with PKCE, OAuth 2.0 Client Credentials, Basic, API Key, Personal Access Token (PAT), No Authentication.

COAuth 2.0 Authorization Code, OAuth 2.0 Authorization code with PKCE, Basic, Windows Authentication, API Key, Kerberos.

DOAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code, OAuth 2.0 Client Credentials, SAML, JWT, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

The types of authentication supported by Connector Builder for Integration Service include various OAuth 2.0 flows, Basic authentication, API Key, and Personal Access Token (PAT). The correct option that lists these authentication types is B, which includes OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code, OAuth 2.0 Authorization code with PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange), OAuth 2.0 Client Credentials, Basic, API Key, and Personal Access Token (PAT), along with No Authentication.

UiPath Integration Service Documentation: Authentication Types in Integration Service

by Lai at Aug 05, 2024, 04:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium UiPath-ADAv1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Slyvia

3 months ago

I’m leaning towards C, but not sure about Windows Auth.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindy

3 months ago

I thought LDAP was a must-have for integrations?

upvoted 0 times

...

Frank

3 months ago

Wait, does it really support No Authentication?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

4 months ago

Totally agree, B seems right!

upvoted 0 times

...

Madalyn

4 months ago

I think it's option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

4 months ago

I thought I saw something about SAML and JWT in the context of authentication, but I’m not confident they are relevant here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emeline

4 months ago

I vaguely recall that LDAP and RADIUS were mentioned in our study materials, but I can't remember if they are supported by Connector Builder.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the answer might include both OAuth 2.0 Client Credentials and Basic Auth.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wai

5 months ago

I think I remember OAuth 2.0 being a big part of the authentication methods, but I'm not sure about the specifics like PKCE.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonardo

5 months ago

Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll start by identifying the common authentication types I'm familiar with, like OAuth 2.0 and basic auth, and then see which option covers those. That should help me narrow it down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by all the different authentication options listed. I'll need to double-check my notes to make sure I understand the differences between them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audry

5 months ago

Ah, I remember learning about this in class. I believe the answer is option B - it covers the key authentication types like OAuth 2.0, API keys, and basic authentication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not too familiar with Connector Builder, so I'll need to think this through carefully. Let me review the options and see if I can eliminate any of the choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

5 months ago

This looks like a straightforward question on the authentication types supported by Connector Builder. I'm pretty confident I can handle this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

5 months ago

Okay, let me see. I remember the "default quarantine" VLAN, and I think there were some others related to things like voice, video, and onboarding. I'll go with option C and hope I've got it right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lore

5 months ago

I'm a bit unsure here. Is this really a regression problem or could it be a classification problem? I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tula

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the different options. They all seem to have some good elements, but I'm not sure which one would be the best overall solution. I'll need to re-read the question and scenario carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maia

1 year ago

I believe D is incorrect because it includes OAuth 1.0 which is not supported.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nakita

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think C could also be a valid choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glynda

1 year ago

I agree with Rosendo, B seems to be the most comprehensive option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arminda

1 year ago

Nah, I'm going with B. It's the most comprehensive list, and I don't need any of that 'Lightweight Directory Access Protocol' nonsense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

1 year ago

B is the way to go. I mean, who doesn't love a good Personal Access Token, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Jade

1 year ago

Definitely! Personal Access Tokens make authentication so much easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geraldo

1 year ago

B) OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code, OAuth 2.0 Authorization code with PKCE, OAuth 2.0 Client Credentials, Basic, API Key, Personal Access Token (PAT), No Authentication.

upvoted 0 times

...