Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

UiPath-ABAv1 Exam - Topic 14 Question 34 Discussion

When executing test cases during the User Acceptance Testing phase of Automation Implementation and an unexpected scenario arises that was not covered in the initial plan, what should the Business Analyst do?
B) The Business Analyst should log the new scenario as a deviation, communicate it to the automation implementation team, and together they should decide on how to handle this new situation.
A) The Business Analyst must handle this new situation independently, make necessary changes, and ensure that the automation performs as expected in this new scenario.
C) The Business Analyst should escalate the new scenario to the project manager or the testing manager to get a solution instead of working with the automation development team.
D) The Business Analyst should ignore the new scenario as it was not initially included in the UAT plan and focus on the scenarios that were agreed upon.

UiPath-ABAv1 Exam - Topic 14 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for UiPath's UiPath-ABAv1 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 14
[All UiPath-ABAv1 Questions]

When executing test cases during the User Acceptance Testing phase of Automation Implementation and an unexpected scenario arises that was not covered in the initial plan, what should the Business Analyst do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

During the User Acceptance Testing (UAT) phase, unforeseen scenarios are not uncommon. The Business Analyst (BA) plays a crucial role in ensuring that these scenarios are managed effectively to maintain the integrity and functionality of the automation.

Understand the Role of UAT:

UAT is designed to ensure that the developed automation aligns with the agreed-upon business requirements.

It involves validating both happy path and exception scenarios. Any new scenario not documented in the UAT plan needs to be addressed systematically.

Why Option B is Correct:

Logging the scenario as a deviation ensures transparency and accountability.

Collaborating with the implementation team allows the BA to leverage their technical expertise for a resolution.

This approach ensures that the scenario is evaluated, documented, and potentially included in future testing cycles.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A: Handling the situation independently disregards team collaboration, potentially leading to gaps in understanding or misaligned fixes.

Option C: Escalating the issue to the project manager without involving the development team delays resolution and bypasses the experts directly responsible for the automation.

Option D: Ignoring the scenario undermines the purpose of UAT, risking the deployment of incomplete or non-functional automation.

Reference to UiPath Practices:

The PDD and UAT plans emphasize logging deviations and continuously updating documentation during UAT.

Change management principles highlight the importance of documenting new requirements and involving the relevant teams.

By logging and addressing deviations collaboratively, the BA ensures the automation solution is robust, efficient, and aligned with business needs.


by Cecil at Jul 04, 2025, 07:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium UiPath-ABAv1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ashlee
7 months ago
Wait, why would anyone ignore a new scenario? That seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
7 months ago
Totally agree, logging deviations helps keep everything on track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
7 months ago
Option C sounds like a good safety net, but it might slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
7 months ago
I feel like the BA should definitely not handle it alone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
8 months ago
I think option B is the best approach. Communication is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
8 months ago
I don't think ignoring the scenario is a good idea, so option D seems wrong. But I’m not clear if we should escalate or log it first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
8 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where escalation was key, so maybe option C is the way to go. It might be safer to involve the project manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think handling it independently like in option A could lead to more issues down the line. We should probably collaborate instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
9 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of communication during UAT, so I think option B makes sense. Logging the deviation and involving the team seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
9 months ago
Handling it independently seems risky. I'd want to make sure I have the right expertise and authority to make changes. Probably better to loop in the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
9 months ago
I'd be hesitant to escalate this to the project manager right away. The automation team is probably best equipped to figure out a solution collaboratively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
9 months ago
The key here is communication. I'd definitely log the new scenario and work with the automation team to decide the best way forward. Can't just ignore it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
9 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I should handle it independently or involve the team. I'll need to think carefully about the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
11 months ago
Option B is the clear winner here. The Business Analyst should work with the team to address any new scenarios, not go rogue or pass the buck to management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
11 months ago
I'm feeling a bit mischievous - maybe the Business Analyst should try option A and show off their secret superhero coding skills to the team. Just a thought!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
11 months ago
Definitely not D! Ignoring a new scenario that arises during testing would be a recipe for disaster. B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
11 months ago
I'm going with B as well. Communicating the new scenario to the team and collaborating on a solution is the responsible way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
10 months ago
A) The Business Analyst must handle this new situation independently, make necessary changes, and ensure that the automation performs as expected in this new scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
11 months ago
I think escalating to the project manager might be necessary in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
11 months ago
Option B seems the most logical choice. The Business Analyst should work with the team to address the new scenario, not handle it alone or ignore it.
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
10 months ago
A) The team can then make necessary changes to ensure that the automation performs as expected in this new scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
10 months ago
A) The team can then make necessary changes to ensure that the automation performs as expected in this new scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
10 months ago
B) The Business Analyst should log the new scenario as a deviation, communicate it to the automation implementation team, and together they should decide on how to handle this new situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
11 months ago
B) The Business Analyst should log the new scenario as a deviation, communicate it to the automation implementation team, and together they should decide on how to handle this new situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberlie
12 months ago
I agree with Ora, teamwork is important in such situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe they should log it as a deviation and discuss with the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 year ago
I think the Business Analyst should handle the new scenario independently.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel