New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Tibco TCA-Tibco-BusinessWorks Exam - Topic 3 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Tibco's TCA-Tibco-BusinessWorks exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 3
[All TCA-Tibco-BusinessWorks Questions]

A company has a requirement that during failover, new jobs and all check-pointed jobs should be processed.

Why is managed fault tolerance the best configuration option?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Denna at Nov 19, 2025, 08:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TCA-Tibco-BusinessWorks Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Aracelis
7 days ago
I disagree, B) makes more sense with unique configs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
12 days ago
A) is spot on! Collaboration is key for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
18 days ago
Managed fault tolerance is the way to go. Who wants to deal with all that database configuration nonsense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
23 days ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote option B has never actually set up a real-world system before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
28 days ago
D sounds tempting, but managed fault tolerance is the better choice for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
1 month ago
I agree, option A makes the most sense. The engines working together is key for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
1 month ago
Option A is the correct answer. The AppNodes are aware of each other and collaborate to provide fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused about the unique database configuration in option B; I thought that was more about individual setups rather than collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
2 months ago
I feel like option D makes sense too, since easier configuration is always a plus, but I can't recall if it really applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
I remember practicing a question about fault tolerance, and I think it mentioned that collaboration between engines is key, which sounds like option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
2 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is A. The question is specifically asking about why managed fault tolerance is the best configuration option, and A describes the key features of managed fault tolerance that make it the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards D because it mentions that managed fault tolerance is easier to configure and requires no design time setup, which sounds like it could be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
2 months ago
I think managed fault tolerance is best because the AppNodes work together, but I'm not sure if that's option A or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
3 months ago
I prefer D. Easier setup is a big plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
3 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question is asking about the best configuration option, but it's not clear to me why managed fault tolerance would be the best. I'll have to review the material and think it through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like there could be multiple valid approaches, but I'm not sure which one the question is looking for. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
4 months ago
I think the answer is A. The question is asking about why managed fault tolerance is the best configuration option, and A describes how the AppNodes are aware of each other and collaborate to provide fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
Jaclyn
2 months ago
Definitely! Fault tolerance needs that awareness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
3 months ago
I agree, A makes the most sense. Collaboration is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel