MENU
A company has a requirement that during failover, new jobs and all check-pointed jobs should be processed.
Why is managed fault tolerance the best configuration option?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium TCA-Tibco-BusinessWorks Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
JU
Junita
6 months ago
D is my choice. Less hassle, more efficiency!
TI
Tien
6 months ago
A is solid. AppNodes working together is smart.
EL
Eleonora
7 months ago
B seems off. Unique configs complicate things.
KE
Kenda
7 months ago
Option A makes sense. Collaboration is key!
CH
Cherry
7 months ago
I think managed fault tolerance is crucial for reliability.
GA
Gary
7 months ago
C) sounds too good to be true, is it really that easy?
MY
Myra
7 months ago
Definitely A), teamwork makes the dream work!
ST
Stephanie
8 months ago
Surprised that D) is even an option, seems too simple!
AR
Aracelis
8 months ago
I disagree, B) makes more sense with unique configs.
JU
Jutta
8 months ago
A) is spot on! Collaboration is key for fault tolerance.
VE
Veta
8 months ago
Managed fault tolerance is the way to go. Who wants to deal with all that database configuration nonsense?
MO
Moon
9 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote option B has never actually set up a real-world system before.
JE
Jeff
9 months ago
D sounds tempting, but managed fault tolerance is the better choice for this requirement.
SA
Sabra
9 months ago
I agree, option A makes the most sense. The engines working together is key for fault tolerance.
CH
Christene
9 months ago
Option A is the correct answer. The AppNodes are aware of each other and collaborate to provide fault tolerance.
PA
Pamela
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the unique database configuration in option B; I thought that was more about individual setups rather than collaboration.
ME
Merri
10 months ago
I feel like option D makes sense too, since easier configuration is always a plus, but I can't recall if it really applies here.
DA
Dahlia
10 months ago
I remember practicing a question about fault tolerance, and I think it mentioned that collaboration between engines is key, which sounds like option A.
SO
Son
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is A. The question is specifically asking about why managed fault tolerance is the best configuration option, and A describes the key features of managed fault tolerance that make it the best choice.
LI
Lizbeth
10 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards D because it mentions that managed fault tolerance is easier to configure and requires no design time setup, which sounds like it could be the best option.
MA
Marsha
10 months ago
I think managed fault tolerance is best because the AppNodes work together, but I'm not sure if that's option A or something else.
SH
Sharika
11 months ago
I prefer D. Easier setup is a big plus.
WI
Wilda
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question is asking about the best configuration option, but it's not clear to me why managed fault tolerance would be the best. I'll have to review the material and think it through more carefully.
EL
Elinore
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like there could be multiple valid approaches, but I'm not sure which one the question is looking for. I'll have to think it through carefully.
TI
Tiera
11 months ago
I think the answer is A. The question is asking about why managed fault tolerance is the best configuration option, and A describes how the AppNodes are aware of each other and collaborate to provide fault tolerance.
GE
Gerald
6 months ago
A covers the teamwork aspect well. Good point!
AL
Alonso
6 months ago
I still think B has its merits, but A is stronger.
MA
Marquetta
6 months ago
A is solid, but D sounds easy too.
JA
Jaclyn
10 months ago
Definitely! Fault tolerance needs that awareness.
BE
Bette
11 months ago
I agree, A makes the most sense. Collaboration is key.