New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group OGEA-103 Exam - Topic 1 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-103 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 1
[All OGEA-103 Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

You are serving as the Lead Architect for an Enterprise Architecture team within a leading multinational biotechnology company. The company works in three major industries, including healthcare, crop production, and agriculture. Your team works within the healthcare division.

The healthcare division is developing a new vaccine, and has to demonstrate its effectiveness and safety in a set of clinical trials that satisfy the regulatory requirements of the relevant health authorities. The clinical trials are undertaken by its research laboratories at multiple facilities worldwide. In addition to internal research and development activities, the healthcare division is also involved in publicly funded collaborative research projects with industrial and academic partners.

The Enterprise Architecture team has been engaged in an architecture project to develop a secure system that will allow the healthcare researchers to share information more easily about their clinical trials, and work more collaboratively across the organization and also with its partners. This system will also connect with external partners.

The Enterprise Architecture team uses the TOGAF ADM with extensions required to support healthcare manufacturing practices and laboratory practices. Due to the highly sensitive nature of the information that is managed, special care has been taken to ensure that each architecture domain considers the security and privacy issues that are relevant.

The Vice President for Worldwide Clinical Research is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture activity. She has stated that disruptions must be minimized for the clinical trials, and that the rollout must be undertaken incrementally.

Refer to the scenario

You have been asked to recommend the approach to identify the work packages for an incremental rollout meeting the requirements.

Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix is a technique that can be used to create work packages for an incremental rollout of the architecture. A work package is a set of actions or tasks that are required to implement a specific part of the architecture. A work package can be associated with one or more Architecture Building Blocks (ABBs) or Solution Building Blocks (SBBs), which are reusable components of business, IT, or architectural capability. A work package can also be associated with one or more Capability Increments, which are defined, discrete portions of the overall capability that deliver business value.A Capability Increment can be realized by one or more Transition Architectures, which are intermediate states of the architecture that enable the transition from the Baseline Architecture to the Target Architecture123

The steps for creating work packages using this technique are:

For each gap between the Baseline Architecture and the Target Architecture, identify a proposed solution and classify it as new development, purchased solution, or based on an existing product. A gap is a difference or deficiency in the current state of the architecture that needs to be addressed by the future state of the architecture. A solution is a way of resolving a gap by implementing one or more ABBs or SBBs.

Group similar solutions together to define the work packages. Similar solutions are those that have common characteristics, such as functionality, technology, vendor, or location.

Identify dependencies between work packages, such as logical, temporal, or resource dependencies. Dependencies indicate the order or priority of the work packages, and the constraints or risks that may affect their implementation.

Regroup the work packages into a set of Capability Increments to transition to the Target Architecture. Capability Increments should be defined based on the business value, effort, and risk associated with each work package, and the schedule and objectives of the clinical trials. Capability Increments should also be aligned with the Architecture Vision and the Architecture Principles.

Document the work packages and the Capability Increments in an Architecture Definition Increments Table, which shows the mapping between the work packages, the ABBs, the SBBs, and the Capability Increments. The table also shows the dependencies, assumptions, and issues related to each work package and Capability Increment.

Therefore, the best answer is B, because it describes the approach to identify the work packages for an incremental rollout meeting the requirements, using the Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix as a planning tool.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tandra
3 months ago
Not sure if grouping by existing products is the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
3 months ago
Totally agree, minimizing disruption is crucial for clinical trials!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
3 months ago
Surprised that they’re using a CRUD matrix for this! Seems a bit basic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
4 months ago
I think B is the best choice for organizing work packages.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
4 months ago
A Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix is key for planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
4 months ago
I feel like the answer should emphasize minimizing disruptions, so I’m leaning towards the option that talks about sequencing the work packages. It’s important to ensure that the rollout is smooth for the clinical trials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should focus more on the Implementation Factor Catalog or the Consolidated Matrix. I remember both were mentioned in our readings, but I can’t recall which one is more relevant for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
4 months ago
I think the idea of grouping similar solutions together to define work packages is crucial, especially since we need to consider the clinical trial schedules. I feel like this aligns with some practice questions we did on incremental rollouts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using a Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix in class. It seems like a good starting point for identifying work packages, but I'm not sure if it's the only tool we should rely on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, with a lot of moving parts to consider. I like the idea of using an Implementation Factor Catalog to capture the actions and constraints upfront. That, combined with the Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix, should give us a solid foundation to group the work packages and sequence the rollout. I'll need to think through the details, but I think option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the different options here. It seems like they all involve using a Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix, but the approaches for grouping the work packages and sequencing the rollout are a bit different. I'll need to carefully review the details of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question on applying TOGAF principles to an incremental rollout. I think the key is to use the Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix to group the work packages, and then sequence them into Capability Increments to minimize disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to use the Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix as a planning tool, and then group the similar solutions together into work packages. Then we need to sequence those work packages into Capability Increments that can be rolled out incrementally to minimize disruption for the clinical trials. I'm feeling pretty confident about this approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. I'll need to review my notes on the different MetroCluster configurations to make sure I choose the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
5 months ago
Alright, I remember learning about standard precautions in class. I think I know the right answer, but I'll double-check the options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. An advance in manufacturing technology would increase supply and shift the curve to the right. A decrease in wages would also increase supply and shift right. And an increase in expected future prices would make suppliers want to sell more now, again shifting supply to the right. So the answer must be C - an increase in the current price of watches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
5 months ago
Ah, I see. The Monitoring tab is the way to go here. It provides a real-time view of the transformation, which is exactly what the question is asking for. I feel confident in selecting that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards option D, as it emphasizes determining required Solution Building Blocks and scheduling the rollout sequentially.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
2 years ago
I see where User3 is coming from, but I personally think option C provides a more detailed approach with the Implementation Factor Catalog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
2 years ago
I feel like option B could also be a good choice, as it focuses on classifying solutions and dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
2 years ago
I agree with User1. Option A suggests grouping work packages to minimize disruptions in the rollout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
2 years ago
I think option A is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
2 years ago
I see your point, Lawrence. Option C does focus on identifying actions and constraints, which could be crucial for a successful rollout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
2 years ago
I have a different opinion. I believe option C is the way to go. Creating an Implementation Factor Catalog and grouping work packages based on dependencies seems more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
2 years ago
I agree with you, Roxane. Option A recommends grouping Solution Building Blocks and sequencing work packages into Capability Increments for a more efficient rollout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
2 years ago
I think option A is the best approach for identifying work packages for an incremental rollout.
upvoted 0 times
...
magoh98402
2 years ago
OGEA-103 is a highly regarded certification that equips individuals with essential skills in organizational governance and enterprise architecture. I'm excited to participate in this program.
upvoted 1 times
...

Save Cancel