New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group OGEA-103 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-103 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All OGEA-103 Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

You are the Lead Enterprise Architect at a major agribusiness company. The company's main

annual harvest is lentils, a highly valued food grown worldwide. The lentil parasite, broomrape,

has been an increasing concern for many years and is now becoming resistant to chemical

controls. In addition, changes in climate favor the propagation and growth of the parasite. As a

result, the parasite cannot realistically be exterminated, and it has become pandemic, with lentil

yields falling globally.

The CEO appreciates the seriousness of the situation and has set out a change in direction

that is effectively a new business for the company. There are opportunities for new products,

and new markets. The company will use the fields for another harvest and will cease to process

third-party lentils. Thus, the target market will change, and the end-products will be different

and more varied. This is a major decision and the CEO has stated a desire to repurpose rather

than replace so as to manage the risks and limit the costs.

The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture practice based in its headquarters and uses

the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework. The practice has an established

Architecture Capability, and uses iteration for architecture development. The CIO is the sponsor

of the activity.

The CIO has assigned the Enterprise Architecture team to this activity. At this stage there is no

shared vision, or requirements.

Refer to the scenario

You have been asked to propose the best approach for architecture development to realize the

CEO's change in direction for the company.

Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Based on the TOGAF standard, this answer is the best approach for architecture development to realize the CEO's change in direction for the company. The reason is as follows:

The scenario describes a major business transformation that requires a clear understanding of the current and future states of the enterprise, as well as the gaps and opportunities for change. Therefore, the priority is to understand and bring structure to the definition of the change, rather than focusing on the implementation details or the technology aspects.

The team should use the TOGAF ADM as the method and guiding framework for architecture development, and adapt it to suit the specific needs and context of the enterprise. The team should also leverage the existing Architecture Capability and the Architecture Repository to reuse and integrate relevant architecture assets and resources.

The team should focus iteration cycles on a baseline first approach to architecture development, which means starting with the definition of the Baseline Architecture in each domain (Business, Data, Application, and Technology), and then defining the Target Architecture in each domain. This will help to identify the current and desired states of the enterprise, and to perform a gap analysis to determine what needs to change in order to achieve the business goals and objectives.

The team should then focus on transition planning, which involves identifying and prioritizing the work packages, projects, and activities that will deliver the change. The team should also create an Architecture Roadmap and an Implementation and Migration Plan that will guide the execution and governance of the change.

The team should use the Architecture Vision phase and the Requirements Management phase to work out in detail what the shared vision is for the change, and to capture and validate the stakeholder requirements and expectations. The team should also use the Architecture Governance framework to ensure the quality, consistency, and compliance of the architecture work.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Emerson
3 months ago
Totally agree, we need to focus on non-functional requirements too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
3 months ago
Not sure if a baseline first approach is the best way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
4 months ago
Surprised they’re shifting away from lentils entirely!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
4 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense for a structured approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
4 months ago
Broomrape is a serious issue for lentils, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
4 months ago
Option D sounds structured, but I’m a bit uncertain if going through all the architecture definition phases first is the right move. I thought we should focus more on the shared vision initially.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
4 months ago
I feel like option C could be a good choice because it emphasizes understanding the change before jumping into transition planning. It reminds me of a practice question we did about iterative cycles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
4 months ago
I think option B makes sense since assessing the current infrastructure could help us understand what we have to work with. But I wonder if we should prioritize defining the change first instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of defining change parameters in our last study session. It seems like option A aligns with that idea, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
5 months ago
Option D seems like the safest bet to me. Going through the full architecture definition process, starting with the baseline, is the best way to ensure we address all the requirements and constraints. That structured approach is key when dealing with a major business shift like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
5 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. We need to get a clear understanding of the change first before we start planning the architecture. Defining the baseline and then mapping out the transition plan seems like the most logical approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit torn here. Option B about assessing the current infrastructure first also seems reasonable. We need to understand the baseline before we can plan the transition. But option A's emphasis on defining the requirements is also really important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd go with option A - focusing on defining the change parameters and requirements to support the new business strategy. That seems like the best way to get a handle on what needs to be done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know fiber optics have some security benefits, but I'll need to think through the specific reasons to answer this well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
5 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'll have to read the options closely and try to eliminate the wrong answers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel