New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group OGEA-102 Exam - Topic 5 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-102 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 5
[All OGEA-102 Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

You are the Chief Enterprise Architect at a large food service company specializing in sales to trade and

wholesale, for example, restaurants and other food retailers.

One of your company's competitors has launched a revolutionary product range and is running a very

aggressive marketing campaign. Your company's resellers are successively announcing that they are not

interested in your company's products and will sell your competitor's.

The CEO has stated there must be significant change to address the situation. He has made it clear that

new markets must be found for the company's products, and that the business needs to pivot, and address the retail market as well as the existing wholesale market.

A consideration is the company's ability and willingness to change its business model, and if it is a temporary or permanent change. An additional risk factor is one of culture. The company has been used to a stable business with a reasonably well known and settled client base - all with its own local understandings and practices.

The CEO is the sponsor of the EA program within the company. You have been engaged with the sales,

logistics, production, and marketing teams, enabling the architecture activity to start. An Architecture Vision, Architecture Principles, and Requirements have all been agreed. As you move forward to develop a possible Target Architecture you have identified that some of the key stakeholders' preferences are incompatible. The incompatibilities are focused primarily on time-to-market, cost savings, and the need to bring out a fully featured product range, but there are additional factors.

Refer to the scenario

You have been asked how you will address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences.

Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

According to the TOGAF standard, the Target Architecture is the description of a future state of the architecture being developed for an organization. It should be aligned with the Architecture Vision, Principles, and Requirements that have been agreed with the stakeholders. To address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences, the TOGAF standard recommends creating and evaluating multiple alternative Target Architectures that meet different sets of criteria. These criteria should reflect the value preferences and priorities of the stakeholders, as well as the business drivers and objectives. The alternative Target Architectures should be illustrated using a set of architecture views that show the impact of each alternative on the business, data, application, and technology domains. The impact on planned projects should also be identified and analyzed. The strengths and weaknesses of each alternative should be understood and documented. A formal stakeholder review should then be conducted to decide which alternative is the most fit for purpose and should be moved forward with. The funding required for implementing the chosen alternative should also be determined and secured.References:

The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase B: Business Architecture - The Open Group

The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase C: Information Systems Architectures - The Open Group

[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase D: Technology Architecture - The Open Group]

[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions - The Open Group]

[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase F: Migration Planning - The Open Group]


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Domitila
3 months ago
Surprised no one mentioned the importance of a clear communication strategy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
3 months ago
D? Really? Sounds like a lot of talking without real action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
3 months ago
C seems solid, but it might take too long to get everyone on board.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
4 months ago
I think B makes more sense, time-to-market is crucial right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
4 months ago
A is the best choice, understanding stakeholder values is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
4 months ago
I recall the emphasis on communication and involving all stakeholders. Option D could be effective, but I'm a bit uncertain about how to ensure everyone's concerns are adequately addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
4 months ago
I feel like using the Architecture Vision and Principles to guide the decision-making process is crucial. Option C sounds solid, but I wonder if it might take too long to get stakeholder buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to balance time-to-market and cost. Option B might be tempting, but compromising on a full product range could backfire.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of understanding stakeholder preferences in class. Option A seems to align with that, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The TOGAF approach of developing alternative architectures, evaluating the tradeoffs, and then collaborating with stakeholders to select the best fit seems like the right way to go. I'll make sure to document the process thoroughly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the best way to handle this. Should I just focus on the minimum viable solution to get something out quickly, or try to fully address all the stakeholder requirements? I'll need to review the TOGAF guidance carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key is to really understand the stakeholder priorities and then develop alternative target architectures that balance those different needs. I'll make sure to get formal stakeholder buy-in on the final approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the scenario and the TOGAF options to make sure I understand the key stakeholder preferences and how to best address the incompatibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
5 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is that the scrum master needs to involve the team in the decision-making process. Asking the team to decide if the task should be reassigned seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
5 months ago
I've got this! The key is to calculate the tax impact of the end-of-life cash flows. Once I have that, I can determine the appropriate value to use in the analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
2 years ago
Yes, we should ensure that the stakeholders are satisfied with how the incompatibilities have been resolved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
2 years ago
I think involving all department heads in resolving incompatibilities is a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
2 years ago
We need to secure the funding required once we have decided on the alternative architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
2 years ago
I believe we should have a formal stakeholder review to decide on the best alternative.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 years ago
Agreed. It's important to understand their priorities and develop alternative architectures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
2 years ago
I think we need to address the stakeholder preferences to move forward with the architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
2 years ago
Ensuring stakeholders are satisfied with the resolution of incompatibilities is key in moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
2 years ago
I believe involving all department heads in resolving incompatibilities is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
2 years ago
Securing the funding required after the formal stakeholder review is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
2 years ago
I agree, collaborating with stakeholders to combine features from different alternatives is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
2 years ago
Yes, developing alternative target architectures might help in addressing the gaps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
2 years ago
I think we should focus on understanding the value preferences of stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel