New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group OG0-093 Exam - Topic 1 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OG0-093 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 1
[All OG0-093 Questions]

Which of the following statements about architecture partitioning are correct?

1. Partitions are used to simplify the management of the Enterprise Architecture.

2. Partitions are equivalent to architecture levels.

3. Partitions enable different teams to work on different element of the architecture at the same time.

4. Partitions reflect the organization's structure.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Reference https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf91-doc/arch/chap41.html


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Catina
3 months ago
Wait, are partitions really tied to the org structure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
3 months ago
1 and 3 make the most sense to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
4 months ago
Surprised to see 4 as a correct answer, really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
4 months ago
I think 2 is totally wrong, they’re not the same!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
4 months ago
Partitions definitely help manage Enterprise Architecture better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
I feel like statement 1 is right, but I'm hesitant about statement 4; does it really reflect the organization's structure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think statements 3 and 4 make sense together since teams often align with the organization's structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
5 months ago
I'm not sure about statement 2 being equivalent to architecture levels; I feel like they might be related but not the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
5 months ago
I remember partitions are meant to simplify management, so I think statement 1 is definitely correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A, setIncident. That just seems like the most logical command to use for this task. I'll mark that one down unless I can think of a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident that either Force.com Sites or Site.com would be a good fit for this scenario. They both allow for public-facing sites that can be managed by non-technical teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
10 months ago
Wait, does this mean I can't just partition my architecture into 'Cats' and 'Dogs' and call it a day? Darn, I was really looking forward to that.
upvoted 0 times
Hortencia
9 months ago
Staci: It's more about simplifying management and enabling different teams to work on different elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
9 months ago
User 2: You need to consider the correct statements about architecture partitioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
9 months ago
User 1: No, that's not how architecture partitioning works.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernardine
10 months ago
Hmm, partitions aren't the same as architecture levels, but they do let different teams work on different parts. I'll go with 'B) 1 & 3'.
upvoted 0 times
Merissa
9 months ago
User4: So, the correct options are 'B) 1 & 3'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
9 months ago
User3: I agree, partitions are not the same as architecture levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
9 months ago
User2: Yeah, and they also allow different teams to work on different parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
9 months ago
User1: I think partitions help simplify managing the architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
9 months ago
'B) 1 & 3' seems to be the best choice based on what we discussed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
10 months ago
So, which option do you think is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
10 months ago
I agree, they also allow different teams to work on different elements at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
10 months ago
I think partitions help simplify managing the Enterprise Architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bo
10 months ago
Okay, let's see... Partitions simplify management, and they're related to the organization's structure. Sounds like a classic case of 'C) 1 & 4' to me.
upvoted 0 times
Marti
10 months ago
Agreed, those statements about architecture partitioning seem accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
10 months ago
I think you're right, C) 1 & 4 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrine
11 months ago
But partitions are not equivalent to architecture levels, so it can't be 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
11 months ago
Wow, this question really gets to the heart of enterprise architecture partitioning! Gotta love those multiple-choice questions that try to trip you up.
upvoted 0 times
Terina
10 months ago
D) 2 & 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
10 months ago
C) 1 & 4
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
10 months ago
B) 1 & 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
10 months ago
A) 2 & 4
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamra
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's 2 and 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
11 months ago
I think the correct statements are 1 and 3.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel