The owner of Toto Industries is evaluating various workers compensation plans for their ability to meet the organization's risk financing goals. The guaranteed cost policy is less effective than other programs in meeting which one of the following goals?
In CPCU 500, risk financing programs are evaluated by how well they help an organization (1) pay for losses, (2) comply with legal requirements, (3) manage uncertainty, and (4) minimize the cost of risk. A workers compensation guaranteed cost policy is the most traditional arrangement: the insured pays a fixed premium (subject to audit), and the insurer assumes the uncertainty of claim frequency and severity. This structure is very effective for paying for losses and managing uncertainty because the organization trades a known premium for the insurer's promise to fund covered claims. It also supports legal compliance, since workers compensation insurance (or an approved alternative) is required in most jurisdictions.
Where guaranteed cost is typically less effective is minimizing the total cost of risk compared with more risk-sensitive plans. The guaranteed cost premium includes insurer expenses, profit provisions, and risk charges for volatility---costs that may exceed the organization's ultimate loss experience. In contrast, programs such as large-deductible, retrospective rating, or self-insurance (where permitted) can reduce frictional costs and align the organization's payments more closely with its actual losses, especially for firms with strong safety performance and predictable loss results. Those alternative plans also strengthen financial incentives for loss control because improved results can translate more directly into lower net costs.
Tricia
1 day agoHubert
6 days agoHubert
11 days agoAaron
17 days agoDenae
22 days agoEulah
27 days ago