Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-3001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-3001 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 1
[All SPLK-3001 Questions]

Following the Installation of ES, an admin configured Leers with the ss_uso r role the ability to close notable events. How would the admin restrict these users from being able to change the status of Resolved notable events to closed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Sarah at Jan 24, 2024, 06:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-3001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Yuriko
5 months ago
I thought giving permissions was enough, but I guess not!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
5 months ago
Wait, can you really restrict that just by changing status transitions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
5 months ago
Definitely A, that’s how you keep things organized!
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
5 months ago
I think B is the better choice, you need to focus on the closed status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
5 months ago
Option A seems right, just remove the user from the closed status transitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
6 months ago
I think option D might be too broad since it removes the edit capability entirely. We just want to restrict closing Resolved events, not all edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between the own Notable Events permission and the status transitions. Could option C actually help in this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
6 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to manage user roles and permissions. I feel like option A makes the most sense since we want to prevent changes to Resolved events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
6 months ago
I think we need to focus on the status transitions, but I'm not sure if it's about removing permissions from the Resolved status or the Closed status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
6 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of Splunk Enterprise Security permissions. I'd recommend carefully reviewing the status configuration and access control settings to ensure we're addressing the specific requirement here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. The question is asking about restricting users from changing the status of Resolved notable events, but the answer options seem to be talking about the Closed status. I'll need to re-read this carefully to make sure I understand the exact problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
6 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about restricting user permissions in Splunk Enterprise Security. I think the key is to focus on the status transitions and remove the ess_user role from being able to change the status to Closed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it now. The admin needs to remove the ess_user role from the status transitions for the Closed status, so that they can't change Resolved notable events to Closed. Option A looks like the right answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
6 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if VLAN, VRF, or VXLAN is the best fit. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and think through the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the advantages of self-healing tech, so I need to focus on which option best describes that. I'm leaning towards Option D, as reducing the cost of support seems like a key benefit of this kind of technology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
11 months ago
I bet the ess_user role is feeling a little 'resolved' about their inability to change the status of those notable events.
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
10 months ago
A) Definitely, we need to ensure only authorized users have the ability to make those changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
10 months ago
B) That makes sense. It's important to restrict access to certain actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
10 months ago
A) From the Status Configuration window select the Resolved status. Remove ess_user from the status transitions for the closed status.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jean
12 months ago
C) is a bold move, giving the ess_user role the own Notable Events permission. I hope they have a good reason for that!
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
10 months ago
D) From Splunk Access Controls, select the ess_user role and remove the edit_notable_events capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
10 months ago
C) In Enterprise Security, give the ess_user role the own Notable Events permission.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
10 months ago
B) From the Status Configuration windows select the closed status. Remove ess_user from the status transitions for the Resolved status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
11 months ago
C) In Enterprise Security, give the ess_user role the own Notable Events permission.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
11 months ago
B) From the Status Configuration windows select the closed status. Remove ess_user from the status transitions for the Resolved status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
11 months ago
A) From the Status Configuration window select the Resolved status. Remove ess_user from the status transitions for the closed status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
11 months ago
A) From the Status Configuration window select the Resolved status. Remove ess_user from the status transitions for the closed status.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
12 months ago
D) is an interesting option, but it would remove the ess_user role's ability to edit any notable events, not just the Resolved ones.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
11 months ago
B) From the Status Configuration windows select the closed status. Remove ess_user from the status transitions for the Resolved status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
11 months ago
A) From the Status Configuration window select the Resolved status. Remove ess_user from the status transitions for the closed status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
11 months ago
B) From the Status Configuration windows select the closed status. Remove ess_user from the status transitions for the Resolved status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
11 months ago
A) From the Status Configuration window select the Resolved status. Remove ess_user from the status transitions for the closed status.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenn
12 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D could also work. Removing the edit_notable_events capability from the ess_user role would limit their ability to close notable events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
12 months ago
B) is not the right answer, as it would remove the ess_user role from the status transitions for the Resolved status, not the Closed status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
I agree with Ceola. That makes sense. It's important to restrict access to prevent unauthorized changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
1 year ago
A) seems like the correct answer, as it restricts the ess_user role from being able to change the status of Resolved notable events to closed.
upvoted 0 times
Gilma
10 months ago
D) It's crucial to manage access controls to ensure the security of the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
11 months ago
A) That makes sense, it's important to restrict certain roles from making changes to closed events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
11 months ago
B) I agree, removing ess_user from the status transitions for the Resolved status would prevent them from closing notable events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
11 months ago
A) seems like the correct answer, as it restricts the ess_user role from being able to change the status of Resolved notable events to closed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
1 year ago
I think the answer is A. By removing ess_user from the status transitions for the closed status, they won't be able to change the status of Resolved notable events to closed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel