Splunk SPLK-2002 Exam - Topic 10 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam

Question #: 66
Topic #: 10

[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

Indexing is slow and real-time search results are delayed in a Splunk environment with two indexers and one search head. There is ample CPU and memory available on the indexers. Which of the following is most likely to improve indexing performance?

AIncrease the maximum number of hot buckets in indexes.conf

BIncrease the number of parallel ingestion pipelines in server.conf

CDecrease the maximum size of the search pipelines in limits.conf

DDecrease the maximum concurrent scheduled searches in limits.conf

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Teddy at Mar 02, 2023, 11:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shala

4 months ago

Definitely A or B, but I lean towards B for real-time improvements!

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassandra

4 months ago

Not sure about that, but I feel like B is the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

4 months ago

Wait, decreasing concurrent searches (D) will really help indexing? That seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nikita

4 months ago

I think option A is the way to go. More hot buckets = better performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

4 months ago

Increasing parallel ingestion pipelines (B) should help speed things up!

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the limits.conf settings; I don’t see how decreasing concurrent searches would help indexing speed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleisha

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question where adjusting ingestion settings made a difference, so I’m leaning towards option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fanny

5 months ago

I think increasing the maximum number of hot buckets could help, but I feel like it might not be the main issue if the CPU and memory are fine.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evelynn

5 months ago

I remember that increasing the number of parallel ingestion pipelines can help with indexing performance, but I'm not sure if that's the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is that A (Accountants) knew M intended to rely on their report for the purpose of the takeover. That should give M grounds to sue in negligence, even though he wasn't their direct client.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karol

5 months ago

Wait, what's the difference between securing Azure VMs and providing pass-through authentication? I'm a little confused on how those relate to the core functions of Cloud App Security. I'll have to think this through.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teri

5 months ago

This seems straightforward to me. The new security policy is probably blocking SMBv1, which is no longer considered secure. I'll go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ezekiel

10 months ago

Wow, these options are like a Splunk-themed version of the classic 'Which one doesn't belong?' game. Option B is the clear winner here, folks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

10 months ago

I'm with Jamal on this one. Decreasing the concurrent scheduled searches sounds like a recipe for disaster. You want your searches to run smoothly, not get stuck in a traffic jam.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

10 months ago

Ha! Decreasing the maximum size of the search pipelines? That's like trying to fit more people in a crowded elevator. It's just going to make things worse.

upvoted 0 times

Cordelia

8 months ago

User 3: Chun: Increasing the maximum number of hot buckets in indexes.conf might also be worth considering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chun

9 months ago

User 2: User Comment: Ha! Decreasing the maximum size of the search pipelines? That's like trying to fit more people in a crowded elevator. It's just going to make things worse.

upvoted 0 times

...

Magnolia

9 months ago

User 1: Maybe increasing the number of parallel ingestion pipelines could help.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alfred

10 months ago

I'm not sure about that. Increasing the maximum number of hot buckets might be a better solution. That way, the index can handle more data without getting bogged down.

upvoted 0 times