Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-2002 Exam - Topic 10 Question 66 Discussion

Indexing is slow and real-time search results are delayed in a Splunk environment with two indexers and one search head. There is ample CPU and memory available on the indexers. Which of the following is most likely to improve indexing performance?
C) Decrease the maximum size of the search pipelines in limits.conf
A) Increase the maximum number of hot buckets in indexes.conf
B) Increase the number of parallel ingestion pipelines in server.conf
D) Decrease the maximum concurrent scheduled searches in limits.conf

Splunk SPLK-2002 Exam - Topic 10 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 10
[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

Indexing is slow and real-time search results are delayed in a Splunk environment with two indexers and one search head. There is ample CPU and memory available on the indexers. Which of the following is most likely to improve indexing performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Teddy at Mar 02, 2023, 11:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shala
8 months ago
Definitely A or B, but I lean towards B for real-time improvements!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
8 months ago
Not sure about that, but I feel like B is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
9 months ago
Wait, decreasing concurrent searches (D) will really help indexing? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
9 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. More hot buckets = better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
9 months ago
Increasing parallel ingestion pipelines (B) should help speed things up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the limits.conf settings; I don’t see how decreasing concurrent searches would help indexing speed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where adjusting ingestion settings made a difference, so I’m leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
9 months ago
I think increasing the maximum number of hot buckets could help, but I feel like it might not be the main issue if the CPU and memory are fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
9 months ago
I remember that increasing the number of parallel ingestion pipelines can help with indexing performance, but I'm not sure if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is that A (Accountants) knew M intended to rely on their report for the purpose of the takeover. That should give M grounds to sue in negligence, even though he wasn't their direct client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
9 months ago
Wait, what's the difference between securing Azure VMs and providing pass-through authentication? I'm a little confused on how those relate to the core functions of Cloud App Security. I'll have to think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
10 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The new security policy is probably blocking SMBv1, which is no longer considered secure. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
Wow, these options are like a Splunk-themed version of the classic 'Which one doesn't belong?' game. Option B is the clear winner here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
1 year ago
I'm with Jamal on this one. Decreasing the concurrent scheduled searches sounds like a recipe for disaster. You want your searches to run smoothly, not get stuck in a traffic jam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
1 year ago
Ha! Decreasing the maximum size of the search pipelines? That's like trying to fit more people in a crowded elevator. It's just going to make things worse.
upvoted 0 times
Cordelia
1 year ago
User 3: Chun: Increasing the maximum number of hot buckets in indexes.conf might also be worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
1 year ago
User 2: User Comment: Ha! Decreasing the maximum size of the search pipelines? That's like trying to fit more people in a crowded elevator. It's just going to make things worse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
1 year ago
User 1: Maybe increasing the number of parallel ingestion pipelines could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alfred
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Increasing the maximum number of hot buckets might be a better solution. That way, the index can handle more data without getting bogged down.
upvoted 0 times
Staci
1 year ago
Maybe we should also consider increasing the number of parallel ingestion pipelines for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
1 year ago
I agree, that could definitely help speed up the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
1 year ago
I think increasing the maximum number of hot buckets could help with indexing performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timothy
1 year ago
Option B seems like the way to go! Increasing the number of parallel ingestion pipelines should help speed up the indexing process.
upvoted 0 times
Kristin
1 year ago
I agree, that sounds like a good solution to improve indexing performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
1 year ago
Option B seems like the way to go! Increasing the number of parallel ingestion pipelines should help speed up the indexing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenny
1 year ago
I believe decreasing the maximum size of the search pipelines in limits.conf might also improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
1 year ago
I agree with Lashonda. More parallel pipelines can speed up indexing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
1 year ago
I think increasing the number of parallel ingestion pipelines in server.conf could help.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel