Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-1003 Topic 12 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1003 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 12
[All SPLK-1003 Questions]

Which of the following accurately describes HTTP Event Collector indexer acknowledgement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The correct answer is B. The network input in Splunk might be found in the $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/$appName/local/inputs.conf file.

A network input is a type of input that monitors data from TCP or UDP ports. To configure a network input, you need to specify the port number, the connection host, the source, and the sourcetype in the inputs.conf file. You can also set other optional settings, such as index, queue, and host_regex1.

The inputs.conf file is a configuration file that contains the settings for different types of inputs, such as files, directories, scripts, network ports, and Windows event logs. The inputs.conf file can be located in various directories, depending on the scope and priority of the settings. The most common locations are:

$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/default: This directory contains the default settings for all inputs. You should not modify or copy the files in this directory2.

$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/local: This directory contains the custom settings for all inputs that apply to the entire Splunk instance. The settings in this directory override the default settings2.

$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/$appName/default: This directory contains the default settings for all inputs that are specific to an app. You should not modify or copy the files in this directory2.

$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/$appName/local: This directory contains the custom settings for all inputs that are specific to an app. The settings in this directory override the default and system settings2.

Therefore, the best practice is to create or edit the inputs.conf file in the $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/$appName/local directory, where $appName is the name of the app that you want to configure the network input for. This way, you can avoid modifying the default files and ensure that your settings are applied to the specific app.

The other options are incorrect because:

A) There is no network directory under the apps directory. The network input settings should be in the inputs.conf file, not in a separate directory.

C) There is no udp.conf file in Splunk. The network input settings should be in the inputs.conf file, not in a separate file. The system directory is not the recommended location for custom settings, as it affects the entire Splunk instance.

D) The var/lib/splunk directory is where Splunk stores the indexed data, not the input settings. The homePath setting is used to specify the location of the index data, not the input data. The inputName is not a valid variable for inputs.conf.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ilda
19 days ago
Separate channel? What is this, the 90s? I bet the correct answer is something super modern and cloud-based.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
27 days ago
This is a tough one, but I'm going to have to go with B. Keeping it consistent with the in-flight data protection seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
1 months ago
D, of course! Storing the status on the Splunk server makes the most sense. Who wants to deal with that on the client side?
upvoted 0 times
Idella
14 days ago
D, of course! Storing the status on the Splunk server makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tayna
2 months ago
C sounds good to me. Enabling it at the global level would be super convenient.
upvoted 0 times
Tegan
23 days ago
Yes, it can be enabled at the global setting level. That would make it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
24 days ago
C sounds good to me. Enabling it at the global level would be super convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tess
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) It can be enabled at the global setting level could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
2 months ago
A separate channel? That's just too much work. I'm going with B, it's gotta be the same as the regular indexer acknowledgement.
upvoted 0 times
Otis
12 days ago
B does seem like the simplest option to go with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
23 days ago
I'm leaning towards B as well, it just seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
29 days ago
Yeah, I think B makes the most sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
1 months ago
I agree, B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
2 months ago
I agree with Reita, that makes sense because it ensures data integrity during transmission.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) It is configured the same as indexer acknowledgement used to protect in-flight data.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel