MENU
The estimated amount receivable from third parties from whom the insured may have the right to recover damages is known as:
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium AFE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
45 comments · newest first
RA
Ramonita
11 months ago
Definitely not reduction for salvation, that's a different thing!
TH
Theola
11 months ago
Not sure about that, sounds too complicated.
ER
Ernest
12 months ago
Wait, I thought it was reduction for damages?
TH
Theresia
12 months ago
Totally agree, subrogation is key in insurance!
TO
Tonette
12 months ago
It's called reduction for subrogation.
DO
Domonique
1 year ago
I feel like I’ve seen something similar before, and I’m leaning towards subrogation too. It just makes sense in this context.
TA
Tasia
1 year ago
I’m a bit lost on this one. I thought reduction for damages might be relevant, but it doesn’t sound quite right.
MO
Moon
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about recovery rights, and I think it was linked to option A, reduction for subrogation.
RO
Ronny
1 year ago
I think this has to do with subrogation, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s the right term.
AU
Audry
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward API question. I'll read through the options carefully and try to identify the one that best matches the description.
SH
Shad
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused on this one. I know the Scrum Master facilitates the sprint planning, but I'm not sure if they actually make the commitment. Let me think this through.
SA
Samuel
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. A network sniffer is a tool that captures and analyzes network communications, so the correct answer is option B. I'm feeling good about this one.
TA
Tayna
1 year ago
If this was a 'reduction for damages', would that mean they're reducing the amount I can claim? I don't like the sound of that. A all the way!
LY
Lynna
1 year ago
I'm going to go with A. Reduction for subrogation. It's the only one that sounds like it could be an actual insurance term.
TE
Tequila
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards reduction for paid losses, but I'm not 100% sure.
JA
Jade
1 year ago
I think it's reduction for damages, but I'm not sure.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
I agree, reduction for subrogation is the correct term.
BE
Bernadine
1 year ago
D. Reduction for paid losses seems the most logical to me. Why would they call it anything else?
CA
Catherin
1 year ago
Yeah, that sounds right. Subrogation is usually related to recovering damages.
AR
Arlyne
1 year ago
I agree, it makes sense to me too.
TA
Tamra
1 year ago
Yeah, I see your point. It does seem like the most logical choice.
BU
Buck
1 year ago
I think it's A) reduction for subrogation.
AR
Arlen
1 year ago
I agree, it makes sense that it would be related to subrogation.
SH
Shaunna
1 year ago
I think it's A) reduction for subrogation because it involves recovering damages from third parties.
LO
Louisa
1 year ago
D) reduction for paid losses
TI
Tina
1 year ago
C) reduction for damages
VE
Verdell
1 year ago
B) reduction for salvation
VA
Val
1 year ago
D) reduction for paid losses
WE
Wenona
1 year ago
C) reduction for damages
VO
Von
1 year ago
A) reduction for subrogation
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
B) reduction for salvation
ZO
Zoila
1 year ago
A) reduction for subrogation
DA
Daniel
1 year ago
Haha, 'reduction for salvation'? What is this, a religious insurance policy? I'll go with A.
AN
Annmarie
1 year ago
So, A) reduction for subrogation it is then.
JU
Judy
1 year ago
Yeah, it's about recovering damages from third parties.
NI
Nicolette
1 year ago
I agree, it does sound like a legal term.
SH
Shayne
1 year ago
I think it's A) reduction for subrogation.
LE
Letha
1 year ago
User 4: I'll go with A too. Sounds like the right answer.
RO
Rodrigo
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, I agree. It's definitely A) reduction for subrogation.
RA
Raylene
1 year ago
User 2: I think it's actually called reduction for subrogation.
DE
Delila
1 year ago
User 1: Haha, 'reduction for salvation'? What is this, a religious insurance policy?
BE
Beckie
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A. Reduction for subrogation. It makes the most sense in the context of the question.
AH
Ahmed
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) reduction for damages.
YU
Yuette
2 years ago
I agree with Crista, because subrogation is when the insurer can recover from a third party.
CR
Crista
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) reduction for subrogation.