New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake DSA-C02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's DSA-C02 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 4
[All DSA-C02 Questions]

Which of the following cross validation versions may not be suitable for very large datasets with hundreds of thousands of samples?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Evaluation metrics are tied to machine learning tasks. There are different metrics for the tasks of classification and regression. Some metrics, like precision-recall, are useful for multiple tasks. Classification and regression are examples of supervised learning, which constitutes a majority of machine learning applications. Using different metrics for performance evaluation, we should be able to im-prove our model's overall predictive power before we roll it out for production on unseen data. Without doing a proper evaluation of the Machine Learning model by using different evaluation metrics, and only depending on accuracy, can lead to a problem when the respective model is deployed on unseen data and may end in poor predictions.

Classification metrics are evaluation measures used to assess the performance of a classification model. Common metrics include accuracy (proportion of correct predictions), precision (true positives over total predicted positives), recall (true positives over total actual positives), F1 score (har-monic mean of precision and recall), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).

Confusion Matrix

Confusion Matrix is a performance measurement for the machine learning classification problems where the output can be two or more classes. It is a table with combinations of predicted and actual values.

It is extremely useful for measuring the Recall, Precision, Accuracy, and AUC-ROC curves.

The four commonly used metrics for evaluating classifier performance are:

1. Accuracy: The proportion of correct predictions out of the total predictions.

2. Precision: The proportion of true positive predictions out of the total positive predictions (precision = true positives / (true positives + false positives)).

3. Recall (Sensitivity or True Positive Rate): The proportion of true positive predictions out of the total actual positive instances (recall = true positives / (true positives + false negatives)).

4. F1 Score: The harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a balance between the two metrics (F1 score = 2 * ((precision * recall) / (precision + recall))).

These metrics help assess the classifier's effectiveness in correctly classifying instances of different classes.

Understanding how well a machine learning model will perform on unseen data is the main purpose behind working with these evaluation metrics. Metrics like accuracy, precision, recall are good ways to evaluate classification models for balanced datasets, but if the data is imbalanced then other methods like ROC/AUC perform better in evaluating the model performance.

ROC curve isn't just a single number but it's a whole curve that provides nuanced details about the behavior of the classifier. It is also hard to quickly compare many ROC curves to each other.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Josefa
3 months ago
I think k-fold is still manageable with the right setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
3 months ago
Wait, all of them? That seems off...
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
3 months ago
Holdout method is fine for large datasets, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
4 months ago
Totally agree, k-fold can be a pain too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
4 months ago
Leave-one-out is super slow for huge datasets!
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
4 months ago
I wonder if all of them could be problematic in some way, but I think leave-one-out is definitely the most resource-heavy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the holdout method is usually fine for large datasets, but leave-one-out could really slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember that k-fold can also be quite intensive with large datasets, especially if k is high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
5 months ago
I think leave-one-out cross-validation might be the least suitable for large datasets since it requires training the model hundreds of thousands of times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
5 months ago
I think the key here is to consider the computational complexity of each cross-validation method. Leave-one-out is likely too slow for very large datasets, and k-fold might also struggle. The holdout method might be the best option to avoid excessive training and evaluation time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I know k-fold cross-validation is a common technique, but I'm not sure how it would perform on datasets with hundreds of thousands of samples. Maybe the holdout method would be better in that case?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think the leave-one-out cross-validation might not be suitable for very large datasets since it requires training and evaluating the model n times, where n is the number of samples. That could be computationally expensive for huge datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
5 months ago
Ah, I see. This is about the scalability of the cross-validation methods. I would guess that the leave-one-out approach would be the least suitable, as it requires training the model n times, which could be prohibitively slow for huge datasets. The holdout method might be the way to go in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a bit confusing. I need to make sure I fully understand the permissions granted in the sudo configuration before I can confidently select the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
9 months ago
Whoa, the options are getting as big as the datasets these days. Time to break out the supercomputer!
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
8 months ago
D) All of the above could work, but some may be more suitable than others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
8 months ago
C) Holdout method could be more efficient for very large datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
8 months ago
B) Leave-one-out cross-validation might take too long with hundreds of thousands of samples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
9 months ago
A) k-fold cross-validation is a good option for large datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Celeste
9 months ago
All of the above? Looks like we're playing 'Guess the Cross-Validation Technique' on Jeopardy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
10 months ago
K-fold cross-validation might be the way to go, but with hundreds of thousands of samples, I'll need a bigger boat!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
10 months ago
Holdout method, huh? Sounds like a great way to get left out in the cold with big data.
upvoted 0 times
Moira
8 months ago
C) Holdout method may not be practical for very large datasets due to the need for a large training set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
8 months ago
B) Leave-one-out cross-validation can be computationally expensive for large datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
8 months ago
A) k-fold cross-validation is more suitable for large datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
9 months ago
C) Holdout method
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
9 months ago
B) Leave-one-out cross-validation
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
10 months ago
A) k-fold cross-validation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuriko
10 months ago
Leave-one-out cross-validation? Ain't nobody got time for that on a massive dataset!
upvoted 0 times
Carissa
9 months ago
D) All of the above
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
9 months ago
C) Holdout method
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
10 months ago
B) Leave-one-out cross-validation
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
10 months ago
A) k-fold cross-validation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Starr
10 months ago
I think Holdout method may also not be suitable for very large datasets because it splits the data into training and testing sets, which can be memory intensive for hundreds of thousands of samples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
10 months ago
I agree with Eve. Leave-one-out cross-validation involves training on all samples except one, which can be computationally expensive for large datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
11 months ago
I think Leave-one-out cross-validation may not be suitable for very large datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel