Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam DEA-C01 Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's DEA-C01 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 1
[All DEA-C01 Questions]

Which use case would be BEST suited for the search optimization service?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The use case that would be best suited for the search optimization service is business users who need fast response times using highly selective filters. The search optimization service is a feature that enables faster queries on tables with high cardinality columns by creating inverted indexes on those columns. High cardinality columns are columns that have a large number of distinct values, such as customer IDs, product SKUs, or email addresses. Queries that use highly selective filters on high cardinality columns can benefit from the search optimization service because they can quickly locate the relevant rows without scanning the entire table. The other options are not best suited for the search optimization service. Option A is incorrect because analysts who need to perform aggregates over high cardinality columns will not benefit from the search optimization service, as they will still need to scan all the rows that match the filter criteria. Option C is incorrect because data scientists who seek specific JOIN statements with large volumes of data will not benefit from the search optimization service, as they will still need to perform join operations that may involve shuffling or sorting data across nodes. Option D is incorrect because data engineers who create clustered tables with frequent reads against clustering keys will not benefit from the search optimization service, as they already have an efficient way to organize and access data based on clustering keys.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Willard
3 days ago
I personally think option D is the best choice, as clustered tables with frequent reads would benefit the most from search optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
4 days ago
I see your point, Annamae. Option A does make sense for aggregates over high cardinality columns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
9 days ago
Option B for sure! Fast response times with selective filters - that's what I need for my business users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
10 days ago
I disagree, I believe option A would be more appropriate for search optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
16 days ago
I think option B is the best suited for search optimization service.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel