Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 1
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A Snowflake Architect is designing a multi-tenant application strategy for an organization in the Snowflake Data Cloud and is considering using an Account Per Tenant strategy.

Which requirements will be addressed with this approach? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

The Account Per Tenant strategy involves creating separate Snowflake accounts for each tenant within the multi-tenant application. This approach offers a number of advantages.

Option B: With separate accounts, each tenant's environment is isolated, making security and RBAC policies simpler to configure and maintain. This is because each account can have its own set of roles and privileges without the risk of cross-tenant access or the complexity of maintaining a highly granular permission model within a shared environment.

Option D: This approach also allows for each tenant to have a unique data shape, meaning that the database schema can be tailored to the specific needs of each tenant without affecting others. This can be essential when tenants have different data models, usage patterns, or application customizations.


by Sabine at May 05, 2025, 01:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ARA-R01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sharika
2 months ago
A and E? What is this, a trick question? Everyone knows that the account-per-tenant strategy is all about flexibility and security, not about reducing object counts or storage costs. B and D for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to go with B and D as well. Simplifying security and accommodating data diversity are key benefits of the account-per-tenant approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
2 months ago
C and E? Really? Snowflake's auto-scaling and shared storage model already take care of those, don't they? I'd go with B and D.
upvoted 0 times
Evette
2 months ago
Unique data shape per tenant is also a key requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
2 months ago
I agree, RBAC policies are important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bobbye
3 months ago
B and D seem like the right choices here. Separate accounts per tenant makes access control a breeze and allows for unique data requirements per tenant.
upvoted 0 times
Lillian
1 months ago
Definitely, optimizing both access control and data requirements is key in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 months ago
It's important to consider both security and flexibility when designing a multi-tenant application strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
2 months ago
Yes, and it also allows for unique data shapes per tenant which can be very beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
I agree, having separate accounts per tenant definitely simplifies access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matt
3 months ago
I believe option B is also crucial. Security and RBAC policies should be simple to configure for each tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
3 months ago
I agree with Man. Having fewer objects per tenant and unique data shape per tenant are important requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
3 months ago
I think option A and D will be addressed with this approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel