Sitecore Exam Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer Topic 3 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Sitecore's Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 3

[All Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer Questions]

A developer is creating a component that has the following requirements:

* Image Left, Title, Call to action

* Image Right, Title, Call to action

* Image Centered, Call to action

The component should be able to display the same content in all three options. What is the best way to build this?

AThree separate components with the compatible renderings set

BOne component with logic in the component to change the view

COne component with three Headless variants

DOne component with rendering parameters to control the layout

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

The Sitecore Content Serialization (SCS) system serializes content items in and out of a Sitecore instance using YAML files1. When deploying to XM Cloud, the XM Cloud deploy process uses serialized item batches through REST APIs at the XM Cloud CM to speed up serialization2. This way, you can serialize large amounts of content items without affecting the performance of the Content Management (CM) instance2.

Sitecore Content Serialization structural overview

Sitecore Content Serialization in XM Cloud

by Wilburn at Jul 08, 2024, 07:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jeniffer

1 months ago

Haha, can you imagine trying to maintain three separate components? Option D is the clear winner here. Ain't nobody got time for that!

upvoted 0 times

Ashton

8 days ago

Yeah, it would be a nightmare to update content in three separate components. Option D is definitely the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margo

19 days ago

I agree, having one component with rendering parameters is more efficient than maintaining three separate components.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jillian

21 days ago

Option D is definitely the way to go. It's much easier to manage with rendering parameters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Portia

1 months ago

Hmm, Option C with three Headless variants could work, but that might be overkill for this use case. Option D is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nichelle

1 months ago

I was thinking of going with Option B, but Option D makes a lot more sense. Keeps everything in one place and allows for flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

Dudley

3 days ago

I think Option D is the way to go for this component.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

18 days ago

It definitely makes sense to have everything in one component for flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

19 days ago

I agree, having rendering parameters to control the layout seems like the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

1 months ago

Option B sounds good, but I think Option D would be more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ming

2 months ago

Option D seems like the most straightforward approach. One component with rendering parameters to control the layout? Brilliant!

upvoted 0 times

Rochell

24 days ago

I think it's the best way to ensure consistency across all three options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

1 months ago

It definitely makes the component more flexible and easier to manage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

1 months ago

I agree, having rendering parameters to control the layout is a smart solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

1 months ago

Option D seems like the most straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oneida

2 months ago

I prefer having three separate components with compatible renderings set. It gives more control over each option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanna

2 months ago

I agree with Timothy. It's more efficient to have one component with flexibility in layout.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

2 months ago

I think the best way is to use one component with rendering parameters to control the layout.

upvoted 0 times

...