ServiceNow CIS-SM Exam - Topic 8 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SM exam

Question #: 58
Topic #: 8

[All CIS-SM Questions]

Which one of the following Regular Expressions could be used to parse the value 5.2.0 from the string?

AVersion (\.*)

BVersion\s+(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)

CVersion (\d+)

DVersion (\d+).(\d+).(\d+)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Linn at Jan 28, 2024, 09:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-SM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Margery

10 months ago

C is way too simple for this versioning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

10 months ago

Wait, can A even work for this? Seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alison

10 months ago

Not so sure about D, it might not handle leading zeros.

upvoted 0 times

...

Queenie

10 months ago

Definitely B, it captures the full version format.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shalon

10 months ago

I think B is the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

11 months ago

I’m not confident, but I feel like option A is too vague to capture the version number correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paz

11 months ago

I’m leaning towards option B as well, but I wonder if option D could work if it’s just looking for the numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francine

11 months ago

I remember practicing regex questions, and I feel like option D might be too strict since it doesn't account for the dots between the numbers properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latrice

11 months ago

I think option B looks familiar because it captures the version format with digits and dots, but I'm not entirely sure if it matches exactly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

11 months ago

Ah, I see what they're getting at. Option D is the correct answer - "Version (\d+).(\d+).(\d+)" will capture each part of the version number separately. Nice and straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to double-check the syntax for matching a version number with three parts separated by periods. Maybe option D is the way to go?

upvoted 0 times

...

Melita

11 months ago

I think option B looks the most promising. The regular expression "Version\s+(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)" should be able to capture the version number in the format we're looking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

I'm a little confused by the different options here. I know regular expressions can be tricky, but I think I'll go with option B. The "Version\s+(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)" pattern seems like it should work for parsing out the version number.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

11 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. If the aiops-ir-core-archiving pod can't communicate with Kafka topics, it would likely mean that event journal updates can no longer be maintained, so I'm going to go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caren

11 months ago

AzCopy could also be a good choice, but I'm not sure if it's the most appropriate for this specific scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

12 months ago

I'm a bit confused, though. I don't recall there being specific details about directors in the report. Is it really option 1?

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryln

1 year ago

Option F: Version (Hopefully not 1.0.0)

upvoted 0 times

Nobuko

1 year ago

I agree, that regex pattern looks like it would capture the value 5.2.0

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) Version\s+(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards Option B. It's concise and covers the typical version number format.

upvoted 0 times

Annabelle

1 year ago

I would go with Option B as well. It seems to be the most reliable option for extracting the version number.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alysa

1 year ago

I agree, Option B seems like the most specific choice for parsing the version number.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fanny

1 year ago

I think Option B is the best choice. It looks like it can capture the version number accurately.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernice

1 year ago

Option A is too broad. Capturing everything between the dots won't give you the specific version numbers.

upvoted 0 times

Ena

1 year ago

I would go with option B as well, it seems to be the most specific.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jimmie

1 year ago

I agree, option A is too broad and might capture more than just the version numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hershel

1 year ago

I think option B) Version\s+(\d+\.\d+\.\d+) would work best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jordan

1 year ago

Option D seems a bit overkill. Splitting the version string into three separate capturing groups feels unnecessary for this use case.

upvoted 0 times

Leota

1 year ago

Yeah, option D does seem like it's doing more than what's needed for just parsing the version number.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krissy

1 year ago

I would go with option B as well, it captures the version number accurately without unnecessary complexity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 year ago

Agreed, option B seems like the most efficient choice for this task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacresha

1 year ago

I think option B) Version\\s+(\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+) would work best for parsing the value 5.2.0.

upvoted 0 times

...

Man

1 year ago

But option B captures the specific format of the version number with digits and dots, making it more accurate

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlene

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Version (\d+).(\d+).(\d+)

upvoted 0 times

...

Man

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) Version\s+(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)

upvoted 0 times

...

Esteban

1 year ago

I think Option B looks the most promising. It specifically targets the 'Version' keyword and a pattern of three numbers separated by dots.

upvoted 0 times

Antonio

1 year ago

I think Option B is the correct one as well. It matches the pattern of three numbers separated by dots after the 'Version' keyword.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audry

1 year ago

I agree, Option B seems to be the most accurate choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

1 year ago

I think Option B is the correct Regular Expression to extract the value 5.2.0 from the string.

upvoted 0 times

...

Danica

1 year ago

I agree, Option B seems like the best choice for parsing the value 5.2.0.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think D) Version (\d+).(\d+).(\d+) could also work if we want to capture each number separately

upvoted 0 times

...

Hillary

1 year ago

I agree with Gwenn, because it specifies the exact format of the version number

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) Version\s+(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)

upvoted 0 times

...