New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow CIS-SM Exam - Topic 3 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SM exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 3
[All CIS-SM Questions]

When building a Discovery Pattern, which one of the following operations results in a termination of the Identification or Connection Section if a condition is not met?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Destiny
3 months ago
"Set Parameter Value" doesn't terminate anything, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
4 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? Sounds off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
4 months ago
Agreed, "Filter Table" is the right answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
4 months ago
I thought it was "Match" that does that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
4 months ago
It's definitely "Filter Table" that causes termination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
5 months ago
I believe "Merge Table" is more about combining data rather than terminating a section, so I don't think it's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards "Set Parameter Value," but I can't recall if it actually causes a termination. It’s a bit confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like "Match" could also lead to a termination if the criteria aren't satisfied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
5 months ago
I think the "Filter Table" operation might be the one that terminates the section if a condition isn't met, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at here. It's got to be Match. That operation allows you to specify a condition, and if that condition isn't met, it would cause the Discovery Pattern to terminate. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Based on my understanding of the Discovery Pattern, I think the answer is Filter Table. That operation would allow you to set a condition that, if not met, would lead to the termination of the Identification or Connection Section.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know the Discovery Pattern is important, but I'm not entirely sure how the different operations interact with it. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through this step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure it's not Set Parameter Value or Merge Table, since those don't seem to directly affect the termination of the Identification or Connection Section. I'm leaning towards either Filter Table or Match.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different operations and how they impact the Discovery Pattern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
5 months ago
Okay, let me walk through this step-by-step. The question is asking about scaling existing pods, so that rules out editing the Pod object directly. PriorityClass is about setting priority for pods, not scaling. That leaves ReplicaSet or Deployment. Since Deployments are a higher-level abstraction that manage ReplicaSets, I think the answer is C - Deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
5 months ago
Opening a second account seems a bit extreme to me. I wonder if splitting requests might complicate things rather than solve them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Does "applicable financial dimensions" mean that dimensions should only be required for expense accounts, or that dimensions should be available for all accounts but only required for expense accounts? I'll need to re-read the requirements carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
2 years ago
Hmm, you might be right. A) Set Parameter Value could also be the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
2 years ago
But wouldn't setting a parameter value also terminate the section if a condition is not met?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure it's D) Match because it checks for a specific condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) Filter Table because it removes unwanted data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
2 years ago
I think it's B) Merge Table because it combines two tables into one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
2 years ago
I think it could be D) Match, as it sounds like it would result in termination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
2 years ago
I agree with user Rashida, I think it's C) Filter Table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's B) Merge Table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
2 years ago
I remember reading that it's A) Set Parameter Value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's D) Match.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Filter Table.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel