MENU
Which of the following are potential benefits for utilizing Security Incident assignment automation? (Choose two.)
Suggested Answer: B, E
Get Premium CIS-SIR Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
DO
Dorothy
11 months ago
Agreed with A, but I’m not sure about D. Consistency can be tough to achieve.
DE
Delila
11 months ago
A is a no-brainer, but D seems a bit too optimistic.
MA
Marion
11 months ago
Surprised that people don't mention C more often. Ingestion time matters too!
IR
Irma
12 months ago
I think B is a mistake. We want to decrease that time, not increase it!
FL
Florinda
12 months ago
Definitely A and D! Faster containment and consistent resolutions are key.
RA
Raylene
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards decreased time to containment and increased resolution process consistency, but I hope I’m not mixing it up with another topic!
JU
Junita
1 year ago
I feel like decreased time to ingestion might be relevant too, but I can't recall if that's directly tied to automation.
IV
Ivette
1 year ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned increased resolution process consistency as a key benefit. That seems right.
MA
Ma
1 year ago
I think decreased time to containment is definitely a benefit, but I'm not sure about the second one.
FR
Frank
1 year ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of incident response best practices. Automation can definitely help speed up the process and improve consistency. I'll focus on those key points when selecting my answers.
HU
Hui
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. What exactly do they mean by "security incident assignment automation"? I want to make sure I understand the concept before I answer.
EV
Evangelina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know automation can help with incident response, but I'm not sure I fully understand all the potential benefits. I'll have to think this through carefully.
NA
Natalie
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the benefits of security incident assignment automation. I'm pretty confident I can identify the two correct answers here.
KI
Kiera
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Decreased time to containment and increased resolution process consistency - those seem like clear benefits of automation. I'll go with those two options.
GL
Glynda
1 year ago
I think option A is the way to go here. Identifying the AD groups and creating the appropriate service conditions seems like the most logical approach. I'll make sure to double-check my work, but I feel confident about this one.
DE
Delmy
1 year ago
I'll start by eliminating the options that don't seem to fit, then focus on the active and standby instance and single instance choices. Gotta be careful with these tricky exam questions.
JU
Juliann
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about modifying a view in a model-driven app. I think I can handle this - the key is to identify the right locations where I can make the changes.
TR
Tracey
1 year ago
Okay, let me see here. The question is asking about the methods supported by ACCS, so I'll need to focus on that specific product and not get distracted by other options.
KA
Kayleigh
1 year ago
B for 'Increased Mean Time to Remediation'? Sounds like the perfect way to get a promotion - by never actually fixing anything!
IV
Ivette
1 year ago
I'm going with A and D. Anything that helps us contain and resolve security incidents more efficiently is a win in my book. Although, increased resolution process consistency might just be code for 'more meetings'.
BR
Brunilda
1 year ago
I agree, efficiency and consistency are key in handling security incidents.
AL
Alberta
1 year ago
D) Increased resolution process consistency
SO
Sol
1 year ago
A) Decreased Time to Containment
MI
Mira
1 year ago
Hmm, C seems a bit odd. I'd rather have the incident data ingested quickly so I can start working on it. Maybe they meant to say 'Decreased Time to Triage'?
ST
Stefania
1 year ago
I think they should have included 'Decreased Time to Triage' as an option instead of 'Decreased Time to Ingestion'.
JA
Jaime
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. 'Decreased Time to Ingestion' doesn't really make sense in this context.
DY
Dyan
1 year ago
D) Increased resolution process consistency
JA
Jacklyn
1 year ago
A) Decreased Time to Containment
AL
Alex
2 years ago
B? Really? I think they meant to say 'Decreased Mean Time to Remediation'. No one wants incidents to take longer to fix!
MA
Marge
1 year ago
Yeah, incidents should be resolved quickly and consistently.
AD
Adolph
1 year ago
I agree, B doesn't make sense. It should be A and D.
BU
Bulah
1 year ago
D) Increased resolution process consistency
CA
Catarina
1 year ago
A) Decreased Time to Containment
RE
Renay
2 years ago
I'm not sure about C, but A and D definitely seem like good reasons to automate.
CA
Cammy
2 years ago
A and D, of course! Automation helps us respond to incidents more quickly and consistently. Definitely a time-saver.
VA
Valentin
1 year ago
D) Increased resolution process consistency
EM
Emeline
2 years ago
A) Decreased Time to Containment
WI
Wilson
2 years ago
I agree with Zona, A and D make sense for automation.
ZO
Zona
2 years ago
I think A and D are potential benefits.