New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow CIS-SAM Exam - Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SAM exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All CIS-SAM Questions]

Risk is configured by default, to calculate Risk = High for a change that is scheduled with only 3 days lead time. Your customer's change policy requires that changes be requested with 5 days lead time.

How would you satisfy this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Juliana
3 months ago
I’m not sure about that, isn’t the Risk Condition more relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
Wait, can you really just change the UI Action like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
4 months ago
Definitely agree with option C, it's the most direct approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
4 months ago
I think updating the Risk Assessment Matrix makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
4 months ago
Sounds like a simple fix, just update the Risk Property.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
5 months ago
I definitely recall that the Risk Matrix plays a role in how risks are assessed, so maybe updating that is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should change the Risk Property or the Risk Condition. They seem similar, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
5 months ago
I remember a practice question about lead times, and I feel like updating the Calculate Risk UI Action could be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
5 months ago
I think we might need to update the Risk Assessment Matrix, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
5 months ago
I'm a little confused - is it really just about updating the Risk Property, or do we need to look at the Risk Matrix or Risk Condition as well? I want to make sure I fully understand the requirements before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is to update the Risk Assessment Matrix for Insufficient lead time. That seems like the most direct way to satisfy the 5-day requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question says the customer's policy requires 5 days lead time, but the default is 3 days. So I'd guess we need to update something related to the lead time requirement, like the Risk Assessment Matrix or the Risk Condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. Is it really just about updating the Risk Property, or could there be other changes needed to the Risk Assessment Matrix or Risk Condition?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
5 months ago
This seems straightforward - I think updating the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident I can identify the key differences between shutdown and init based on the options provided. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the impact of cost of capital on project evaluation metrics. I'll need to think through the relationships between these measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards the idea that we can just rename locations directly in the report, but I think we practiced editing them elsewhere too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
6 months ago
Hmm, I keep mixing up the layers. Is the Network Services Orchestrator more about customer-facing or resource-facing services? I think it's A, but I need to think more about the other option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
10 months ago
I'd say the answer is C - update the 'Calculate Risk UI Action' to just say 'Approve anyway, what could go wrong?'
upvoted 0 times
Aide
8 months ago
Definitely, it would streamline the process and ensure compliance with the customer's change policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
9 months ago
Agreed, updating the Calculate Risk UI Action seems like the most direct solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
9 months ago
I think C is the best option. It would make the process smoother.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
9 months ago
E) Update the Risk Condition for Insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
9 months ago
D) Update the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
9 months ago
C) Update the Calculate Risk UI Action
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
9 months ago
B) Update the Risk Assessment Matrix for Insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
9 months ago
A) Update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delbert
10 months ago
A is the way to go. It's the simplest and most direct solution to update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time.
upvoted 0 times
Stacey
9 months ago
D) Update the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
9 months ago
Great idea! That would definitely help meet the customer's change policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
10 months ago
A) Update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
11 months ago
E all the way! Updating the Risk Condition for Insufficient lead time is the clear winner in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time could also work. What do you guys think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
11 months ago
I agree with Curt. Updating the Risk Property makes the most sense to satisfy the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
11 months ago
D is my pick. Updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time seems like the most logical solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Myong
10 months ago
Yes, that would align with the customer's change policy and ensure the correct risk level is calculated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
10 months ago
I agree, updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
10 months ago
Yes, that would align with the customer's change policy and ensure the correct risk level is calculated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
10 months ago
I agree, updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sueann
11 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Updating the Risk Assessment Matrix seems like the most straightforward approach to address the lead time requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Rozella
10 months ago
Option B seems like the most direct way to address the lead time issue and align with the customer's policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
10 months ago
Updating the Risk Assessment Matrix is a clear solution to meet the 5 days lead time requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
10 months ago
I think option B is the best choice to ensure changes are requested with sufficient lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
11 months ago
I agree, updating the Risk Assessment Matrix would align with the customer's change policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curt
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel