Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ServiceNow Exam CIS-SAM Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SAM exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All CIS-SAM Questions]

Risk is configured by default, to calculate Risk = High for a change that is scheduled with only 3 days lead time. Your customer's change policy requires that changes be requested with 5 days lead time.

How would you satisfy this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jacqueline at Oct 17, 2023, 04:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-SAM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Carylon
29 days ago
I'd say the answer is C - update the 'Calculate Risk UI Action' to just say 'Approve anyway, what could go wrong?'
upvoted 0 times
Titus
3 days ago
A) Update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delbert
1 months ago
A is the way to go. It's the simplest and most direct solution to update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time.
upvoted 0 times
Stacey
5 days ago
D) Update the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
7 days ago
Great idea! That would definitely help meet the customer's change policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
1 months ago
A) Update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
1 months ago
E all the way! Updating the Risk Condition for Insufficient lead time is the clear winner in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time could also work. What do you guys think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
2 months ago
I agree with Curt. Updating the Risk Property makes the most sense to satisfy the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
2 months ago
D is my pick. Updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time seems like the most logical solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Myong
17 days ago
Yes, that would align with the customer's change policy and ensure the correct risk level is calculated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
22 days ago
I agree, updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
29 days ago
Yes, that would align with the customer's change policy and ensure the correct risk level is calculated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
1 months ago
I agree, updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sueann
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Updating the Risk Assessment Matrix seems like the most straightforward approach to address the lead time requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Rozella
1 months ago
Option B seems like the most direct way to address the lead time issue and align with the customer's policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 months ago
Updating the Risk Assessment Matrix is a clear solution to meet the 5 days lead time requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
1 months ago
I think option B is the best choice to ensure changes are requested with sufficient lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
1 months ago
I agree, updating the Risk Assessment Matrix would align with the customer's change policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curt
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel