MENU
Which of the following roles can delete a change?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CIS-ITSM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
14 comments · newest first
JO
Jose
12 months ago
I disagree, I think itil_admin should have that ability.
TH
Therese
12 months ago
Definitely B, change_manager is the right answer.
RE
Reiko
1 year ago
Wait, none of these roles can delete? That’s surprising!
AN
Anna
1 year ago
I thought itil_admin had that power too?
CL
Claudia
1 year ago
Change_manager can delete changes.
MA
Ma
1 year ago
I feel like itil might have some permissions, but I don't think it's the one that can delete changes.
HI
Hillary
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where it mentioned that only specific roles can delete changes, but I can't recall the exact details.
RE
Rebbeca
1 year ago
I think the change_manager role can delete a change, but I'm not entirely sure if itil_admin has that capability too.
CO
Cordelia
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards "None of the listed answers," but I remember something about change_manager being crucial in this process.
DE
Delmy
1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about Watson Studio in class. It's a collaborative environment for data scientists, developers, and domain experts to work together. Definitely going with B.
DO
Douglass
1 year ago
Wait, hearing voices is definitely NOT a standard depression symptom - I'm pretty sure that's the key here.
EL
Elouise
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about inactive data in data extensions, so I'm leaning towards D - applying a row-based retention to each data extension as it's created, set to 12 months.
LA
Lawrence
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know that holidays can disrupt typical sales patterns, and inventory levels being inaccurate can also be an issue. I'm leaning towards option C, the lag time in the system, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
KA
Katie
1 year ago
I think option A sounds harsh; termination should only happen with clear evidence of on-the-job drinking, right?