MENU
Your team is one of seven teams working on a product. All teams use the same version control system. Which is the best approach to deliver high-quality increments?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium PSD Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The product must be releasable and done must mean the same for all additions to the product. So they must have a DoD that can combined. There is no hardening sprint.
38 comments · newest first
ME
Merilyn
10 months ago
Local and private builds (B) are essential for quick feedback!
LU
Luisa
11 months ago
Wait, is it really feasible for all teams to use one build?
CO
Colette
11 months ago
Each team having its own build (C) could lead to fragmentation.
FE
Fernanda
11 months ago
I disagree, having one build could slow things down too much.
LA
Lavonne
11 months ago
Option D seems like the best way to ensure consistency across teams.
VE
Velda
12 months ago
I feel like local and private builds are important, but I’m not sure how they fit into the overall strategy for high-quality increments in a multi-team setup.
IZ
Izetta
12 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think having each team manage its own automated build could help maintain quality, but I’m not entirely confident.
LA
Lanie
12 months ago
I think having one automated build for all teams could streamline things, but it might also create bottlenecks if everyone is trying to integrate at once.
LU
Lucina
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of integrating builds regularly, but I’m not sure if that means each team should have their own build or if one shared build is better.
EM
Emmanuel
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the right answer is for each team to have its own automated build. That way, we can catch issues early and make sure that each team's work is integrated smoothly.
WI
William
1 year ago
Having one automated build for all teams seems like it could be a recipe for disaster. With seven different teams working on the same product, I think it's important for each team to have their own automated build to ensure quality.
DE
Dean
1 year ago
I think the best approach is to have each team's automated build integrated towards the end of the sprint. That way, we can catch any issues early and make sure the final product is high-quality.
ME
Melvin
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should we be doing a combination of local and private builds, or should each team have its own automated build? I'm not sure which option is the best.
TE
Terrilyn
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the specifics of Traps endpoints and the ESM Server. I'll have to think this through carefully and try to eliminate the incorrect options.
LE
Leontine
1 year ago
I think the key is to look at what's happening with the opportunities and the account. Changes to the opportunities could be causing updates to the account, which then triggers the account trigger again.
LO
Lonna
1 year ago
The attachment point and the percentage of costs above that point are important clues. I'm leaning towards one of the "stop-loss" options, but I need to double-check the definitions.
BE
Beatriz
1 year ago
Wait, you mean I can't use my special build script that makes everything turn purple? Bummer.
MA
Malcom
1 year ago
Option A is a bit outdated. We need more real-time integration to keep up with the pace of development these days.
GI
Gilma
1 year ago
D) There is one automated build for all teams
TR
Trina
1 year ago
C) Each team should have its own automated build
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
B) Developers should perform a combination of local and private builds
KA
Kassandra
1 year ago
A) Each team's automated build is integrated toward the end of the sprint
MI
Ming
1 year ago
Option B is a good compromise, allowing for both local and private builds to catch issues early.
HU
Hubert
1 year ago
C) Each team should have its own automated build
GI
Giovanna
1 year ago
B) Developers should perform a combination of local and private builds
TA
Tamar
1 year ago
A) Each team's automated build is integrated toward the end of the sprint
SL
Slyvia
1 year ago
I think Option D is the way to go. Having one automated build for all teams promotes better collaboration and consistency.
LA
Laticia
1 year ago
That's true, but having one automated build for all teams can help in identifying conflicts and ensuring a cohesive product.
CA
Catherin
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be more efficient if each team had their own automated build? That way they can catch errors early on.
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
I agree, having one automated build for all teams reduces the chances of integration issues.
MI
Micah
1 year ago
Option D is definitely the best choice. It ensures that all teams are working on the same page.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
Option C seems the best approach to ensure each team can deliver high-quality increments independently.
MA
Mammie
2 years ago
I disagree. I think there should be one automated build for all teams to ensure consistency and avoid integration issues.
OT
Otis
2 years ago
I agree with Julian. It would ensure that each team is responsible for the quality of their increments.
JU
Julian
2 years ago
I think each team should have its own automated build.
LE
Leota
2 years ago
I prefer option D, having one automated build for all teams. It would promote collaboration and consistency across the teams.
LO
Lonny
2 years ago
I agree with Billye. It would ensure that each team can deliver high-quality increments independently.
BI
Billye
2 years ago
I think each team should have its own automated build.