New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scrum PSD Exam - Topic 1 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSD exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 1
[All PSD Questions]

Your team is one of seven teams working on a product. All teams use the same version control system. Which is the best approach to deliver high-quality increments?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The product must be releasable and done must mean the same for all additions to the product. So they must have a DoD that can combined. There is no hardening sprint.


by Maddie at May 01, 2024, 06:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSD Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Merilyn
3 months ago
Local and private builds (B) are essential for quick feedback!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
3 months ago
Wait, is it really feasible for all teams to use one build?
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
3 months ago
Each team having its own build (C) could lead to fragmentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
4 months ago
I disagree, having one build could slow things down too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
4 months ago
Option D seems like the best way to ensure consistency across teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
4 months ago
I feel like local and private builds are important, but I’m not sure how they fit into the overall strategy for high-quality increments in a multi-team setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think having each team manage its own automated build could help maintain quality, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
4 months ago
I think having one automated build for all teams could streamline things, but it might also create bottlenecks if everyone is trying to integrate at once.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of integrating builds regularly, but I’m not sure if that means each team should have their own build or if one shared build is better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the right answer is for each team to have its own automated build. That way, we can catch issues early and make sure that each team's work is integrated smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
5 months ago
Having one automated build for all teams seems like it could be a recipe for disaster. With seven different teams working on the same product, I think it's important for each team to have their own automated build to ensure quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
5 months ago
I think the best approach is to have each team's automated build integrated towards the end of the sprint. That way, we can catch any issues early and make sure the final product is high-quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should we be doing a combination of local and private builds, or should each team have its own automated build? I'm not sure which option is the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the specifics of Traps endpoints and the ESM Server. I'll have to think this through carefully and try to eliminate the incorrect options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
5 months ago
I think the key is to look at what's happening with the opportunities and the account. Changes to the opportunities could be causing updates to the account, which then triggers the account trigger again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
5 months ago
The attachment point and the percentage of costs above that point are important clues. I'm leaning towards one of the "stop-loss" options, but I need to double-check the definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
9 months ago
Wait, you mean I can't use my special build script that makes everything turn purple? Bummer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
9 months ago
Option A is a bit outdated. We need more real-time integration to keep up with the pace of development these days.
upvoted 0 times
Gilma
8 months ago
D) There is one automated build for all teams
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
8 months ago
C) Each team should have its own automated build
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
9 months ago
B) Developers should perform a combination of local and private builds
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
9 months ago
A) Each team's automated build is integrated toward the end of the sprint
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ming
9 months ago
Option B is a good compromise, allowing for both local and private builds to catch issues early.
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
8 months ago
C) Each team should have its own automated build
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
8 months ago
B) Developers should perform a combination of local and private builds
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
9 months ago
A) Each team's automated build is integrated toward the end of the sprint
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Slyvia
10 months ago
I think Option D is the way to go. Having one automated build for all teams promotes better collaboration and consistency.
upvoted 0 times
Laticia
9 months ago
That's true, but having one automated build for all teams can help in identifying conflicts and ensuring a cohesive product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
10 months ago
But wouldn't it be more efficient if each team had their own automated build? That way they can catch errors early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
10 months ago
I agree, having one automated build for all teams reduces the chances of integration issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
10 months ago
Option D is definitely the best choice. It ensures that all teams are working on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
Option C seems the best approach to ensure each team can deliver high-quality increments independently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
11 months ago
I disagree. I think there should be one automated build for all teams to ensure consistency and avoid integration issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
11 months ago
I agree with Julian. It would ensure that each team is responsible for the quality of their increments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
11 months ago
I think each team should have its own automated build.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
I prefer option D, having one automated build for all teams. It would promote collaboration and consistency across the teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
11 months ago
I agree with Billye. It would ensure that each team can deliver high-quality increments independently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
11 months ago
I think each team should have its own automated build.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel