Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scrum PSD Exam - Topic 1 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSD exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 1
[All PSD Questions]

Is it a good idea to follow each automated build with the execution of automated tests?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The refinement is very important and can take quite some time for that reason, however, it should not endanger the sprint goal.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leonardo
6 months ago
Not sure about that, it might distract the devs too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
6 months ago
Wait, does it really improve code coverage that much?
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
7 months ago
Yes! Bugs found early save time later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
7 months ago
I think it slows down the process too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
7 months ago
Totally agree, testing right after builds is key for quality!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
7 months ago
I agree with option A, but I also remember some concerns about code coverage not always reflecting quality accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
7 months ago
I feel like running tests after every build might slow things down too much, but I can't recall the exact pros and cons we covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
8 months ago
I think we practiced a question like this, and I leaned towards option D because identifying bugs early seems crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
8 months ago
I remember discussing how automated tests can catch bugs early, but I'm not sure if they always need to run after every build.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The auditor has a responsibility to assess the design and implementation of internal controls, including anti-fraud controls. But the primary responsibility for establishing those controls lies with the organization, not the auditor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
8 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. The three layers mentioned - terminal, network, and application - sound familiar to me from the course material. I'll go with true and move on to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
8 months ago
I'm torn between whether both A and B can be true or if I'm missing something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about behavior modification. I think I'll go with contingency shaped behavior since the self-talk strategy is being taught to the student.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
8 months ago
From what I practiced, I believe that after removing unhealthy ECS instances, the scaling process should automatically maintain the desired capacity without needing to add them back manually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 year ago
Wait, so we're supposed to choose between 'wasting time' and 'disturbing focus'? Sounds like a lose-lose situation to me. I vote for option E: Hire a team of super-focused, time-bending developers who can write and run tests in the blink of an eye!
upvoted 0 times
Shakira
11 months ago
D) Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
11 months ago
C) No, the outcomes might disturb the developers' focus
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
11 months ago
B) No, it takes too much time
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
11 months ago
A) Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
11 months ago
Wait, so we're supposed to choose between 'wasting time' and 'disturbing focus'? Sounds like a lose-lose situation to me. I vote for option E: Hire a team of super-focused, time-bending developers who can write and run tests in the blink of an eye!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
11 months ago
D) Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
1 year ago
A) Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felton
1 year ago
Hah, option A is a good one! We all know 'code coverage' is the new buzzword in town. Might as well use it to our advantage, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
1 year ago
Option C? Really? Disturbing the developers' focus? That's just an excuse to avoid the hard work of writing and running tests. Gotta keep those developers on their toes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
1 year ago
Nah, I don't agree with option B. Who cares if it takes a little extra time? Finding and fixing bugs now is way better than dealing with them later.
upvoted 0 times
Dawne
1 year ago
User 2: D) Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 year ago
User 1: A) Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Santos
1 year ago
C) No, the outcomes might disturb the developers' focus
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
Definitely, running automated tests after each build is a must! Option D is the way to go. Catching bugs early is crucial for maintaining a high-quality codebase.
upvoted 0 times
Andra
1 year ago
Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 year ago
I agree, catching bugs early is crucial for maintaining a high-quality codebase
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 year ago
Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Scot
1 year ago
D) Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 year ago
A) Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel