MENU
Is it a good idea to follow each automated build with the execution of automated tests?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium PSD Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The refinement is very important and can take quite some time for that reason, however, it should not endanger the sprint goal.
34 comments · newest first
LE
Leonardo
11 months ago
Not sure about that, it might distract the devs too!
AL
Alfred
11 months ago
Wait, does it really improve code coverage that much?
JU
Justine
11 months ago
Yes! Bugs found early save time later on.
LE
Lettie
11 months ago
I think it slows down the process too much.
RO
Rosalind
12 months ago
Totally agree, testing right after builds is key for quality!
LE
Leeann
12 months ago
I agree with option A, but I also remember some concerns about code coverage not always reflecting quality accurately.
YO
Yolando
12 months ago
I feel like running tests after every build might slow things down too much, but I can't recall the exact pros and cons we covered.
MO
Mohammad
1 year ago
I think we practiced a question like this, and I leaned towards option D because identifying bugs early seems crucial.
DE
Destiny
1 year ago
I remember discussing how automated tests can catch bugs early, but I'm not sure if they always need to run after every build.
VI
Vincenza
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The auditor has a responsibility to assess the design and implementation of internal controls, including anti-fraud controls. But the primary responsibility for establishing those controls lies with the organization, not the auditor.
RE
Ressie
1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. The three layers mentioned - terminal, network, and application - sound familiar to me from the course material. I'll go with true and move on to the next question.
DE
Deja
1 year ago
I'm torn between whether both A and B can be true or if I'm missing something.
SH
Shala
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about behavior modification. I think I'll go with contingency shaped behavior since the self-talk strategy is being taught to the student.
JE
Jesse
1 year ago
From what I practiced, I believe that after removing unhealthy ECS instances, the scaling process should automatically maintain the desired capacity without needing to add them back manually.
OD
Odette
1 year ago
Wait, so we're supposed to choose between 'wasting time' and 'disturbing focus'? Sounds like a lose-lose situation to me. I vote for option E: Hire a team of super-focused, time-bending developers who can write and run tests in the blink of an eye!
SH
Shakira
1 year ago
D) Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
BE
Benedict
1 year ago
C) No, the outcomes might disturb the developers' focus
MI
Micheal
1 year ago
B) No, it takes too much time
BE
Benedict
1 year ago
A) Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress
AI
Aimee
1 year ago
Wait, so we're supposed to choose between 'wasting time' and 'disturbing focus'? Sounds like a lose-lose situation to me. I vote for option E: Hire a team of super-focused, time-bending developers who can write and run tests in the blink of an eye!
SH
Shanice
1 year ago
D) Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
BL
Blondell
1 year ago
A) Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress
FE
Felton
1 year ago
Hah, option A is a good one! We all know 'code coverage' is the new buzzword in town. Might as well use it to our advantage, right?
LA
Launa
1 year ago
Option C? Really? Disturbing the developers' focus? That's just an excuse to avoid the hard work of writing and running tests. Gotta keep those developers on their toes!
YE
Yesenia
1 year ago
Nah, I don't agree with option B. Who cares if it takes a little extra time? Finding and fixing bugs now is way better than dealing with them later.
DA
Dawne
1 year ago
User 2: D) Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
CA
Carissa
1 year ago
User 1: A) Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress
SA
Santos
2 years ago
C) No, the outcomes might disturb the developers' focus
LE
Leota
2 years ago
Definitely, running automated tests after each build is a must! Option D is the way to go. Catching bugs early is crucial for maintaining a high-quality codebase.
AN
Andra
1 year ago
Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
I agree, catching bugs early is crucial for maintaining a high-quality codebase
FI
Filiberto
1 year ago
Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress
SC
Scot
2 years ago
D) Yes, the tests may identify whether there are bugs that the developers should fix before proceeding
LE
Leonida
2 years ago
A) Yes, it will show code coverage which is an excellent metric of quality and progress