Discuss Scaled Agile SSM Exam Topic 4 Question 4

What is one recommended practice for Scrum Masters/Team Coaches when facilitating Iteration Review?

ALimit participants to just the team members

BEncourage team members to spend 3+ hours preparing

CEncourage the team member with the best presentation skills to demo each Iteration

DBegin to consider how and what to demo in Iteration Planning

Suggested Answer: D

One of the recommended practices for Scrum Masters/Team Coaches when facilitating Iteration Review is to begin to consider how and what to demo in Iteration Planning. This helps the team to have a clear vision of the expected outcome and to align their work with the iteration goals. It also facilitates the preparation and execution of the demo, as the team can anticipate the feedback and questions from the stakeholders. (Must be taken from SAFe 6 Scrum Master resources)

Iteration Review - Scaled Agile Framework

SAFe Scrum Master Course Outline

Get Premium SSM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

18 comments · newest first

Myra 11 months ago

I like the idea of demos, but not sure about the best presenter always going.

Pete 11 months ago

Wait, do we really need 3+ hours for prep? That sounds excessive!

William 11 months ago

Limiting to just team members seems too restrictive.

Lanie 11 months ago

Totally agree, planning ahead makes a difference.

Carin 12 months ago

I think option D is a solid practice!

Miles 12 months ago

I vaguely recall that planning what to demo should happen before the iteration starts, so option D sounds familiar to me.

Willodean 12 months ago

I practiced a question about who should present during reviews, and I don’t think it should just be the best presenter. Everyone should have a chance, right?

Genevive 1 year ago

I’m not sure, but I feel like preparing for the review shouldn’t take more than a couple of hours. Three seems excessive.

Adelaide 1 year ago

I think I remember something about involving stakeholders in the review, so limiting participants to just team members seems off.

Na 1 year ago

Limiting the participants to just the team members doesn't sound right to me. The Iteration Review is an opportunity to get feedback from key stakeholders, so I would want to include them.

Ayesha 1 year ago

I think the key here is to encourage the team to start planning for the Iteration Review during the Iteration Planning meeting. That way, they can be well-prepared to demonstrate their work.

Teri 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if the Scrum Guide has a specific recommendation about who should participate in the Iteration Review. I'll have to review that section again.

Mertie 1 year ago

I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The Scrum Guide recommends that the Iteration Review should include the Scrum Team and key stakeholders, not just the team members.

Valentin 1 year ago

Okay, let me read the question again and think about the key terms. "Temporarily persist" and "alternative to caching" - that gives me a clue to the right answer.

Shay 1 year ago

I'd start with Shodan to see what I can find about the security cameras and any other internet-exposed systems. Then I'd use Recon-ng to dig deeper and automate the reconnaissance process.

Daniel 1 year ago

Okay, I've got this. The key is to ensure the software upgrade is properly tested, approved, and applied. That points to the change management process as the best approach here.

Celeste 1 year ago

Definitely report this! Memory leaks can cause all sorts of problems down the line. Better to get it fixed now before it becomes a bigger headache.

Yuriko 1 year ago

The order of resource allocation is tricky, but I remember the key is to prioritize locality - local resources first, then same rack, then any machine. I'm leaning towards C.

Scaled Agile SSM Exam - Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion