Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile SP-SAFe-Practitioner Exam - Topic 1 Question 48 Discussion

What is one recommended way of splitting Features into Stories during a PI Planning event?
D) Implement the simplest variant of the functionality first and then implement the rest as an enhancement
A) Develop the user interface (UI) with sample business logic and database access and then add the actual functionality behind the UI
B) Implement the database structure first and then implement the business logic and user interface
C) Develop the functionality first and then test it on a second pass

Scaled Agile SP-SAFe-Practitioner Exam - Topic 1 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SP-SAFe-Practitioner exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 1
[All SP-SAFe-Practitioner Questions]

What is one recommended way of splitting Features into Stories during a PI Planning event?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

One of the recommended ways of splitting Features into Stories during a PI Planning event is to use thehorizontal slicingtechnique, which means implementing the simplest variant of the functionality first and then adding more complexity and variations as enhancements. This technique helps to deliver value incrementally, reduce risk, and enable fast feedback and learning. Horizontal slicing also supports the application of theMinimum Viable Product (MVP)andMinimum Marketable Feature (MMF)concepts, which aim to deliver the smallest amount of functionality that can provide value and validate assumptions.Reference:Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe Practitioner,Feature,Story


by Jenelle at Nov 24, 2025, 03:33 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SP-SAFe-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kayleigh
2 months ago
C could work, but testing later might miss early bugs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
2 months ago
D is more user-friendly. Users appreciate gradual improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
2 months ago
Option A seems risky. UI first can lead to issues later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
2 months ago
I agree, D allows for quick feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
2 months ago
B seems too rigid, we need flexibility in our planning!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
2 months ago
Not sure about D, what if the enhancements take too long?
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
3 months ago
Wait, isn't A more efficient for UI-heavy projects?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
3 months ago
Totally agree, starting simple makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
3 months ago
I think D is the best approach for quick wins!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
4 months ago
B) Implement the database structure first and then implement the business logic and user interface. Gotta have a solid foundation before building the house, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the correct answer is "D) Implement the simplest variant of the functionality first and then implement the rest as an enhancement." Who needs all the bells and whistles when you can get the job done quickly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
4 months ago
D) Implement the simplest variant of the functionality first and then implement the rest as an enhancement. This is the most efficient way to deliver value quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
4 months ago
A) Develop the user interface (UI) with sample business logic and database access and then add the actual functionality behind the UI. This ensures the UI is ready for the actual implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
4 months ago
D) Implement the simplest variant of the functionality first and then implement the rest as an enhancement. This approach allows for quick delivery of core features and iterative improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D too, but I’m a bit confused about how enhancements fit into the overall planning process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
5 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like we discussed implementing the UI first in one of our practice sessions. Was that option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
5 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I think I'll need to review the material again before deciding on an approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option A. Developing the UI with sample logic first seems like a good way to get a feel for the overall system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
5 months ago
Option B seems like the logical approach to me. Get the database set up first, then build the rest on top of that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
5 months ago
I think I remember that the simplest variant approach is often recommended, so maybe D is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
6 months ago
I think option D is the best. Start simple, then enhance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
6 months ago
I recall something about starting with the database structure, but that seems more complex than just implementing the simplest version first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
6 months ago
I prefer B. Database structure is foundational.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if I should focus on the UI first or the database structure. Any tips?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
7 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Start with the simplest functionality and then build on it.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
27 days ago
Exactly! Iterative improvements are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
1 month ago
Plus, it reduces risks in the early stages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 month ago
Definitely! It allows for quicker feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
1 month ago
Yeah, enhancements are easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
6 months ago
I agree, option D makes sense. Start simple!
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel