Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile SAFe-SGP Exam - Topic 7 Question 19 Discussion

What are two recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog? (Choose two.)
A) Tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting and E) Calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries
B) Organizing ARTs by funding classification
C) Including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement
D) Using charge codes assigned by each program

Scaled Agile SAFe-SGP Exam - Topic 7 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 7
[All SAFe-SGP Questions]

What are two recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting and calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries are two recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. The article states that ''To track expenditures, the Program Backlog can be tagged with funding metadata for future reporting. Additionally, a fixed cost labor cost per ART can be calculated based on actual salaries. This simplifies the tracking of labor costs and allows for more accurate forecasting.'' Therefore, the correct answers are A, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting, and E, calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. Organizing ARTs by funding classification (B) is not a recommended practice, as it may create silos and reduce collaboration across ARTs. Including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement is not a necessary step, as the backlog items should be prioritized based on value and not on cost. Using charge codes assigned by each program (D) is not a simple or effective way to track expenditures, as it may introduce overhead and complexity.


by Anisha at Sep 18, 2024, 07:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-SGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ryan
9 months ago
Charge codes are a must! Helps keep everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
9 months ago
Wait, including a fiduciary expert? Is that really necessary?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
10 months ago
Organizing ARTs by funding classification? Seems a bit complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
10 months ago
Totally agree! Funding metadata makes reporting way easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
10 months ago
I think tagging backlog items is super important for tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
10 months ago
Using charge codes assigned by each program sounds familiar too. I think that could help in tracking expenditures effectively, but I need to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeann
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement could be a good choice, but I’m not entirely convinced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
11 months ago
I'm not so sure about the options. I remember something about organizing ARTs by funding classification, but I can't recall if it was specifically for tracking expenditures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
11 months ago
I think tagging backlog items with funding metadata is definitely one of the recommendations. It helps in tracking expenses later, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
11 months ago
I've got this! Tagging backlog items with funding metadata and using charge codes assigned by each program are the two best recommendations for tracking expenditures. The other options are not as relevant to the Program Backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. Including a fiduciary expert and calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART don't seem directly related to tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. I'll need to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. Tagging backlog items and using charge codes assigned by each program seem like practical ways to track expenditures. I'll go with those two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
11 months ago
Hmm, not sure about this one. Tagging backlog items with funding metadata and organizing ARTs by funding classification seem like good options, but I'm not confident about the other choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, just need to identify the two best recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
2 years ago
This is a trick question, right? I mean, who needs to track expenditures when you can just use the force to bend the budget to your will? #JediBacklogMaster
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
2 years ago
A and D, no doubt. Tagging and charge codes are the bread and butter of any good backlog tracking system. The other options are just trying to distract us from the real deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
2 years ago
B and C, definitely. Organizing by funding and including a fiduciary expert sounds like a surefire way to keep those bean-counters happy. Who needs charge codes when you've got the financial guru on your side?
upvoted 0 times
Lillian
2 years ago
C) Including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
2 years ago
B) Organizing ARTs by funding classification
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
2 years ago
I'm torn between A and E. While A is the obvious choice, E could be a clever way to get a more accurate cost estimate. Hmm, decisions, decisions.
upvoted 0 times
Leonora
2 years ago
B) Organizing ARTs by funding classification
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
2 years ago
E) Calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
2 years ago
A) Tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Toi
2 years ago
I prefer using charge codes assigned by each program for tracking expenditures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
2 years ago
I agree with Coletta, it helps with future reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
2 years ago
I think tagging backlog items with funding metadata is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
2 years ago
A and D, of course! Tagging backlog items and using charge codes are the way to go for tracking expenditures. Anything else is just fluff.
upvoted 0 times
Francine
2 years ago
A and D, of course! Tagging backlog items and using charge codes are the way to go for tracking expenditures. Anything else is just fluff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 years ago
D) Using charge codes assigned by each program
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
2 years ago
A) Tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel