Scaled Agile SAFe-SGP Exam - Topic 7 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam

Question #: 19
Topic #: 7

[All SAFe-SGP Questions]

What are two recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog? (Choose two.)

ATagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting

BOrganizing ARTs by funding classification

CIncluding a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement

DUsing charge codes assigned by each program

ECalculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, E

According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting and calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries are two recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. The article states that ''To track expenditures, the Program Backlog can be tagged with funding metadata for future reporting. Additionally, a fixed cost labor cost per ART can be calculated based on actual salaries. This simplifies the tracking of labor costs and allows for more accurate forecasting.'' Therefore, the correct answers are A, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting, and E, calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. Organizing ARTs by funding classification (B) is not a recommended practice, as it may create silos and reduce collaboration across ARTs. Including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement is not a necessary step, as the backlog items should be prioritized based on value and not on cost. Using charge codes assigned by each program (D) is not a simple or effective way to track expenditures, as it may introduce overhead and complexity.

by Anisha at Sep 18, 2024, 07:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-SGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ryan

3 months ago

Charge codes are a must! Helps keep everything organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

3 months ago

Wait, including a fiduciary expert? Is that really necessary?

upvoted 0 times

...

Wei

3 months ago

Organizing ARTs by funding classification? Seems a bit complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elli

4 months ago

Totally agree! Funding metadata makes reporting way easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

4 months ago

I think tagging backlog items is super important for tracking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mabelle

4 months ago

Using charge codes assigned by each program sounds familiar too. I think that could help in tracking expenditures effectively, but I need to double-check my notes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeann

4 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement could be a good choice, but I’m not entirely convinced.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

5 months ago

I'm not so sure about the options. I remember something about organizing ARTs by funding classification, but I can't recall if it was specifically for tracking expenditures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryann

5 months ago

I think tagging backlog items with funding metadata is definitely one of the recommendations. It helps in tracking expenses later, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lovetta

5 months ago

I've got this! Tagging backlog items with funding metadata and using charge codes assigned by each program are the two best recommendations for tracking expenditures. The other options are not as relevant to the Program Backlog.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the options here. Including a fiduciary expert and calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART don't seem directly related to tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. I'll need to re-read the question carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawna

5 months ago

Okay, let's think this through. Tagging backlog items and using charge codes assigned by each program seem like practical ways to track expenditures. I'll go with those two.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquita

5 months ago

Hmm, not sure about this one. Tagging backlog items with funding metadata and organizing ARTs by funding classification seem like good options, but I'm not confident about the other choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aimee

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward, just need to identify the two best recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristina

1 year ago

This is a trick question, right? I mean, who needs to track expenditures when you can just use the force to bend the budget to your will? #JediBacklogMaster

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 year ago

A and D, no doubt. Tagging and charge codes are the bread and butter of any good backlog tracking system. The other options are just trying to distract us from the real deal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yvonne

1 year ago

B and C, definitely. Organizing by funding and including a fiduciary expert sounds like a surefire way to keep those bean-counters happy. Who needs charge codes when you've got the financial guru on your side?

upvoted 0 times