Which statement is true about Lean-Agile development and contracting?
The true statement about Lean-Agile development and contracting is A. Quality is built-in through collaboration and automation. Lean-Agile development is an iterative and incremental approach to software development that emphasizes flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement. Quality is not something that is added at the end of the development cycle, but rather something that is embedded throughout the process. Lean-Agile teams collaborate with customers and stakeholders to define clear and testable acceptance criteria for each work item.They also use automation tools to perform frequent testing, integration, and deployment of the software, ensuring that the solution meets the quality standards and compliance requirements12.
1:Advanced Topic - Agile Contracts - Scaled Agile Framework2:Government - Building in Quality and Compliance - Scaled Agile Framework
When should government technology programs be organized as Solution Trains?
According to theSolution Trainarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, Solution Trains are the organizational construct used to build large solutions that require the coordination of multiple ARTs and suppliers. The article states that ''Solution Trains form for different reasons. Some trains form with new ARTs and Agile Teams to specifically address a large initiative, while others begin by combining existing ARTs and teams.'' Therefore, the correct answer is D, when the size and complexity require two or more ARTs. The other options are not relevant to the definition of a Solution Train.
Which statement is true about Lean-Agile development and contracting?
The true statement about Lean-Agile development and contracting is A. Quality is built-in through collaboration and automation. Lean-Agile development is an iterative and incremental approach to software development that emphasizes flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement. Quality is not something that is added at the end of the development cycle, but rather something that is embedded throughout the process. Lean-Agile teams collaborate with customers and stakeholders to define clear and testable acceptance criteria for each work item.They also use automation tools to perform frequent testing, integration, and deployment of the software, ensuring that the solution meets the quality standards and compliance requirements12.
1:Advanced Topic - Agile Contracts - Scaled Agile Framework2:Government - Building in Quality and Compliance - Scaled Agile Framework
What events in SAFe provide objective evidence of built-in quality and compliance?
According to theSystem Demoarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, system demos provide objective evidence of built-in quality and compliance. The article states that ''The System Demo is a significant event that provides an integrated view of new Features for the most recent Iteration delivered by all the teams in the Agile Release Train (ART). Each demo gives ART stakeholders an objective measure of progress during a Program Increment (PI). The system demo is part of the inspect and adapt cycle and provides ARTs with the opportunity to assess their current state, adjust, and improve. The system demo also provides feedback on functional and nonfunctional requirements, such as compliance, performance, security, and usability.'' Therefore, the correct answer is C, system demos. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the events that provide objective evidence of built-in quality and compliance. PI planning (A) is a face-to-face event that serves as the heartbeat of the ART, aligning all the teams on the ART to a shared mission and vision. Backlog refinement (B) is the process of breaking down, estimating, and prioritizing the backlog items. ART syncs (D) are meetings that facilitate cross-team collaboration and alignment.
When should government technology programs be organized as Solution Trains?
According to theSolution Trainarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, Solution Trains are the organizational construct used to build large solutions that require the coordination of multiple ARTs and suppliers. The article states that ''Solution Trains form for different reasons. Some trains form with new ARTs and Agile Teams to specifically address a large initiative, while others begin by combining existing ARTs and teams.'' Therefore, the correct answer is D, when the size and complexity require two or more ARTs. The other options are not relevant to the definition of a Solution Train.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!
Penney
18 days agoLavonne
25 days agoSarina
1 month agoRebeca
1 month agoJerry
2 months agoAllene
2 months agoAaron
2 months agoLottie
2 months agoJennifer
3 months agoDomonique
3 months agoTaryn
3 months agoRusty
3 months agoSherly
4 months agoRichelle
4 months agoMurray
4 months agoMatt
4 months agoRaylene
5 months agoAlline
5 months agoKyoko
5 months agoChau
6 months agoJerry
6 months agoFelice
6 months agoAilene
6 months agoWerner
7 months agoDenae
7 months agoMy
7 months agoMichael
7 months agoMelita
8 months agoDarell
8 months agoLinette
8 months agoSolange
10 months agoCasandra
10 months agoFrancine
10 months agoGlenn
11 months agoTwanna
12 months agoPatrick
1 year agoStephaine
1 year agoMaile
1 year agoPedro
1 year agoAja
1 year agoElouise
1 year agoNieves
1 year agoOmega
1 year agoLashandra
1 year agoErinn
1 year agoTori
1 year agoLamar
1 year agoCraig
1 year agoSherita
1 year agoWillie
1 year agoBrittni
1 year agoLachelle
1 year agoSkye
1 year agoJames
1 year agoGlynda
1 year agoLeigha
1 year agoMariko
1 year agoBelen
2 years agoViva
2 years agoMonte
2 years agoDavida
2 years agoMariann
2 years agoCordie
2 years agoYoko
2 years agoKrissy
2 years agoViola
2 years agoQuentin
2 years agoLaila
2 years agoBobbye
2 years agoDulce
2 years agoCarey
2 years agoColette
2 years agoAliza
2 years agoBarrett
2 years agoCristina
2 years agoKati
2 years ago